Discourse Analysis of Narratives of Islamic Political Polarization in Indonesian Digital Media
Keywords:
Islamic Politics; Polarization; Digital media; Discourse analysis; IndonesiaAbstract
This research examines how messages or polarizing narratives, in Islamic politics emerge and spread across Indonesia's digital media. The background of this study is crucial because we are witnessing an increasing number of heated debates in the public sphere, especially concerning religious and political issues. Digital media have become the main platforms where these debates unfold and widely disseminate. By employing discourse analysis, a specific method for understanding how language meaning, this study aims to uncover how certain groups or individuals create, disseminate, and receive stories that can divide society. We also want to understand how these narratives then influence many people's views. The data for this research were collected from various digital media sources, for instance, social media posts and online news articles, particularly during periods when polarization was highly prominent. Our findings indicate that narratives of Islamic political polarization in digital media are often presented by creating two opposing camps, using emotional language, and employing religious symbols to discredit political opponents. These communication strategies aim to strengthen group cohesion and distinguish between "us" and "them." This, in turn, can lead to societal division and weaken national unity. The conclusion of this study highlights the importance of the public being more digitally literate and thinking critically when encountering divisive information. This is essential for maintaining socio-political stability in Indonesia. This study is expected to enhance our understanding of how Islamic politics operates today and how digital media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion in Indonesia.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.
Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
Hidayat, R. (2022). Politik identitas dan polarisasi di media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi, 15(2), 123–135.
KhosraviNik, M. (2021). Social media discourse: A critical approach. Routledge.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
Murtadho, A. (2021). Simbol agama dalam politik: Analisis wacana. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 9(1), 34–50.
Nugroho, S. (2021). Media sosial dan dinamika polarisasi politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media, 11(3), 150–165.
Papacharissi, Z. (2021). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity Press.
Prabowo, T. (2021). Bias dalam penyajian berita: Dampaknya terhadap polarisasi politik. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(2), 90–105.
Rahman, A. (2021). Media sosial dan polarisasi politik: Sebuah tinjauan. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 10(1), 45–60.
Setiawan, B. (2022). Dampak media digital terhadap sikap politik masyarakat. Jurnal Sosiologi, 8(3), 78–90.
Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Susilo, E. (2021). Pengaruh media digital terhadap opini publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media, 12(4), 200–215.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
van Dijk, T. A. (2020). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 100
,
PDF Downloads: 14