The Identity Politics and the Delegitimization of Local Culture: A Case Study of FPI's Satire of Dedi Mulyadi in the Context of Sunda Wiwitan

Abstract

This research aims to discuss the dynamics of identity politics and the practice of delegitimizing local culture through a case study of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) satirizing Dedi Mulyadi in the context of his defense of Sundanese culture, especially Sunda Wiwitan. This satire and criticism addressed to the FPI reflect differences of opinion on religious views and the fact that strengthening specific religious identities sometimes comes at the expense of local cultural diversity. This research also uses a qualitative approach by conducting a critical discourse analysis of various existing sources, including media coverage, character statements, and public documentation. The final results of this study show that the insinuation of Dedi Mulyadi, which is part of the identity politics strategy plan, seeks to negate local cultural values that are not by the majority's religious interpretation. In this context, Sunda Wiwitan is positioned as "the other," making it vulnerable to Delegitimization. The research of this study shows that the space for dialogue is significant, especially about religious identity and local cultural expressions as a foundation in a multicultural society in Indonesia.