Digital Device Use Intensity and Main Idea Comprehension among Fourth-Grade Elementary School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v11n3.p389-403Keywords:
Reading Comprehension, Elementary School, Gadget Use, Digital Device Use Intensity, Main IdeaAbstract
Digital devices are widely used by elementary school students, and evidence on how intensive use relates to specific reading skills remains mixed. This study aims to examine whether and how digital device use intensity is associated with main idea comprehension among fourth-grade students. The study extends previous research by examining device use intensity through four indicators (frequency, duration, purpose of use, and digital activity) in relation to a specific comprehension skill within an Indonesian elementary school context. A cross-sectional correlational (ex post facto) design was applied with 27 fourth-grade students selected through purposive sampling, and a separate class of 25 students was used to pilot the instruments. Data were collected with a 25-item questionnaire and a 25-item multiple-choice main idea test, and were analyzed with Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. Gadget use intensity showed a negative and statistically significant association with main idea comprehension (r = −.518, 95% CI [−.75, −.17], p = .006) and accounted for 26.8% of the variance (R² = .268). These findings describe an association in a small, single-school sample and do not establish causation. They suggest that guidance on the duration and purpose of device use may be relevant to reading comprehension, together with classroom instruction and home reading practices.
References
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025). Do new forms of reading pay off? A meta-analysis on the relationship between leisure digital reading habits and text comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 95(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216463
Chen, J., Lin, C.-H., & Chen, G. (2021). A cross-cultural perspective on the relationships among social media use, self-regulated learning and adolescents’ digital reading literacy. Computers & Education, 175, Article 104322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104322
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Delgado, P., & Salmerón, L. (2021). The inattentive on-screen reading: Reading medium affects attention and reading comprehension under time pressure. Learning and Instruction, 71, Article 101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101396
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Dorris, C., Winter, K., O’Hare, L., & Lwoga, E. T. (2024). Mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), Article e1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1417
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483–517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Hare, C., Johnson, B., Vlahiotis, M., Panda, E. J., Tekok-Kilic, A., & Curtin, S. (2024). Children’s reading outcomes in digital and print mediums: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Reading, 47(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12461
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
Lei, H., Xiong, Y., Chiu, M. M., Zhang, J., & Cai, Z. (2021). The relationship between ICT literacy and academic achievement among students: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, Article 106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106123
Madigan, S., Browne, D., Racine, N., Mori, C., & Tough, S. (2019). Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(3), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056
Madigan, S., McArthur, B. A., Anhorn, C., Eirich, R., & Christakis, D. A. (2020). Associations between screen use and child language skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(7), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
Ostiz-Blanco, M., Bernacer, J., Garcia-Arbizu, I., Diaz-Sanchez, P., Rello, L., Lallier, M., & Arrondo, G. (2021). Improving reading through videogames and digital apps: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 652948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652948
Sanders, T., Noetel, M., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., Biddle, S., Ronto, R., Hulteen, R., Parker, R., Thomas, G., De Cocker, K., Salmon, J., Hesketh, K., Weeks, N., Arnott, H., Devine, E., Vasconcellos, R., Pagano, R., Sherson, J., Conigrave, J., & Lonsdale, C. (2024). An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths’ interactions with electronic screens. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01712-8
Savva, M., Higgins, S., & Beckmann, N. (2022). Meta-analysis examining the effects of electronic storybooks on language and literacy outcomes for children in grades Pre-K to grade 2. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 526–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12623
Schwabe, A., Lind, F., Kosch, L., & Boomgaarden, H. (2022). No negative effects of reading on screen on comprehension of narrative texts compared to print: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 25(6), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2070216
Stevens, E. A., Vaughn, S., House, L., & Stillman-Spisak, S. (2020). The effects of a paraphrasing and text structure intervention on the main idea generation and reading comprehension of students with reading disabilities in grades 4 and 5. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1684925
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. P. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 153
,
PDF Downloads: 120
