Examining Students' Collaborative Skills in an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p91-106Keywords:
Artifical Intelligence, Think-Pair-Share, cooperative learning, collaborative skills, primary educationAbstract
Collaborative skills are central to primary education, and limited research has examined whether artificial intelligence (AI) support embedded in Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning relates to these skills in primary school integrated natural and social science learning, so this study aimed to examine whether and how an AI-assisted TPS model is implemented and how it relates to students' collaborative skills. A quantitative approach with a causal-associative orientation was applied, using questionnaires, observation sheets completed by two observers, and documentation to capture teachers' and students' responses, teacher implementation, and six indicators of collaborative skills. Expert validation of the response questionnaires reached 94%, observation of teacher implementation reached 92.5% across the think, pair, and share stages, the mutual respect indicator reached 96%, and teachers and students reported positive responses. These descriptive findings indicate that the model was implemented in line with its syntax and was accompanied by high observed collaborative behavior, although the absence of a comparison group means that the findings require testing in experimental studies.
References
Adl-Amini, K., Völlinger, V. A., & Eckart, A. (2024). Implementation quality of cooperative learning and teacher beliefs: A mixed methods study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(3), 2267-2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00769-3
Alsmadi, M. A., Tabieh, A. A. S., Alsaifi, R. M., & Al-Nawaiseh, S. J. (2023). The effect of the collaborative discussion strategy think-pair-share on developing students’ skills in solving engineering mathematical problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 1123-1135. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1123
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240-3256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
Choi, H. J., & Mantik, O. (2017). The effect of scaffolded think-group-share learning on Indonesian elementary schooler satisfaction and learning achievement in English classes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017236113
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, Article 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
de Araujo, A., Papadopoulos, P. M., McKenney, S., & de Jong, T. (2024). A learning analytics-based collaborative conversational agent to foster productive dialogue in inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 2700-2714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13007
Edwards, J., Nguyen, A., Lämsä, J., Sobocinski, M., Whitehead, R., Dang, B., Roberts, A.-S., & Järvelä, S. (2025). Human-AI collaboration: Designing artificial agents to facilitate socially shared regulation among learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 712-733. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13534
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
Kurjum, M., Muhid, A., & Thohir, M. (2020). Think-pair-share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in Islamic studies: Is it effective? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28762
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Lee, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, P.-Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI-based chatbot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1843-1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8
Lobo-Quintero, R. (2025). AI-enhanced think-pair-share: A learning analytics approach to foster linguistic creative thinking and collaborative learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(2), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8807
Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Think-pair-share and roundtable: Two cooperative learning structures to enhance critical thinking skills of 4th graders. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 15(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.274
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). Navigating elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers & Education, 220, Article 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105112
Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Weinberger, A. (2016). Conversational agents for academically productive talk: A comparison of directed and undirected agent interventions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9246-2
Veldman, M. A., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2020a). Young children working together: Cooperative learning effects on group work of children in Grade 1 of primary education. Learning and Instruction, 67, Article 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101308
Veldman, M. A., van Kuijk, M. F., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2020b). The proof of the pudding is in the eating? Implementation of cooperative learning: Differences in teachers’ attitudes and beliefs. Teachers and Teaching, 26(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1740197
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 95
,
PDF Downloads: 108







