Pembentukan Identitas Kolektif pada Gerakan Konservasi Mangrove
The Collective Identity Formation of a Mangrove Conservation Movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v12n1.p19-36Keywords:
Gerakan sosial, identitas kolektif, konservasi, representasi sosialAbstract
This study aims to understand the collective identity formation of Kelompok Pantai Lestari (KPL) as the mangrove conservation movement. This study employed a qualitative method with a constructivist grounded theory. The subjects of this study were 4 peoples who are the founders of KPL. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analyzed through the steps from open, axial, and selective codings to the creation of a conceptual model of the collective identity formation in a mangrove conservation movement. The social representation theory was used as the framework that guided the data analysis. The results show that the foundation of the KPL as a conservation movement was related to the production of social knowledge among existing conservation groups on the importance of ecological values for improving welfare. KPL has been playing major role in producing local wisdom on environmental conservation and advocating the making of local regulations which put scientific knowledge into practice. The KPL’s mangrove conservation initiatives indicates that coastal communities have the potential to become a thinking society in environmental preservation; thus, it can be a reference for social engineering in environmental conservation that emphasizes on the collective action and identity.
Keywords: Collective identity, conservation, social movement, social representation
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami pembentukan identitas kolektif pada Kelompok Pantai Lestari KPL) sebagai gerakan konservasi mangrove. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode constructivist grounded theory. Subjek penelitian adalah pendiri KPL berjumlah 4 orang. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan dianalisis mengikuti tahapan pengolahan data dari pengkodean open, axial, dan selektif hingga pembuatan model konseptual pembentukan identitas kolektif gerakan konservasi mangrove. Teori representasi sosial dimanfaatkan dalam interpretasi data. Hasil analisis menunjukkan lahirnya KPL sebagai gerakan konservasi menandai cara kerja representasi sosial yang berpusat pada produksi pengetahuan sosial tentang kelembagaan kelompok konservasi dan pentingnya nilai ekologis untuk peningkatan kesejahteraan. KPL berperan besar dalam memproduksi kearifan lokal dengan mengadvokasi lahirnya peraturan daerah yang mengkonstruksi pengetahuan ilmiah menjadi pengetahuan praktis dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Keberhasilan KPL sebagai gerakan konservasi mangrove menunjukkan bahwa masyakat pesisir memiliki potensi sebagai sebuah masyarakat berpikir, dan dapat menjadi contoh rekayasa sosial dalam gerakan konservasi yang mengandalkan pada tindakan dan identitas kolektif.
References
Abric, J. C. (1996). Specific processes of social representation. Paper on Social Representation, 5, 77-80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284667199_Specific_Processes_of_Social_Representations
Abric, J.-C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.). Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 42–47). Blackwell Publishing.
Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Alexander Haslam, S. (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 479–497.https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X50184
Alikodra, H. S. (2012). Konservasi sumberdaya alam dan lingkungan: Pendekatan ecosophy bagi penyelamatan bumi. Gadjah Mada University.
Alongi, D. M. (2014). Carbon Cycling and Storage in Mangrove Forests. Annual Review of Marine Science, 6(1), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020
Armitage, D. (2002). Socio-institutional dynamics and the political ecology of mangrove forest conservation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Global Environmental Change, 12(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00023-7
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
Atang, A. (2018). Gerakan sosial dan kebudayaan: Teori dan strategi perlawanan masyarakat adat atas serbuan investasi tambang. Intrans Publishing.
Bakuniak, G., & Nowak, K. (1987). The Creation of a Collective Identity in a Social Movement: The Case of “Solidarność” in Poland. Theory and Society, 16(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139488
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Curran, D., Durbin, T. J., Epstein, G., Greenberg, A., Nelson, M. P., Sandlos, J., Stedman, R., Teel, T. L., Thomas, R., Veríssimo, D., & Wyborn, C. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Clayton, S. D., & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M., & Kanninen, M. (2011). Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature Geoscience, 4(5), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123
Fatimatuzzahroh, F., Hadi, S. P., & Purnaweni, H. (2018). Mangrove Cultivation Community Based in Karangsong, Indramayu, West Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 145, 012139. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012139
Fauzie, A. (2017). Mengembangkan Psikologi Konservasi Melalui Model Perilaku Ekologis Mangrove. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 8(1), 11-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v8n1.p11-23
Fauzie, A., Suryanto, & Matulessy, A. (2018). Peran perubahan orientasi nilai dan identitas kolektif pada gerakan konservasi masyarakat pesisir. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan 2018: Aktualisasi Kebijakan Berbasis Sains untuk Mendukung Pembangunan Kelautan dan Perikanan Berkelanjutan. Balai Besar Riset Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Ed.). (2007). The world’s mangroves, 1980-2005: A thematic study in the framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/a1427e/a1427e00.htm
Galuh, I. G. A. A. K. (2016). Media Sosial sebagai Strategi Gerakan Bali Tolak Reklamasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v13i1.602
Gifford, R. (Ed.). (2015). Research methods for environmental psychology. Wiley.
Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L. L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J., & Duke, N. (2011). Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x
Gunawan, H. (2017). Dynamics of mangrove community in revegetation area of Karangsong, north coast of Indramayu District, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, Journal of Biological Diversity, 18(2), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180230
Hund, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2004). Collective identity, solidarity and commitment. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.) The Blackwell companion to social movement (pp. 433–457). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch19
Jaspal, R., & Breakwell, G. M. (Eds.). (2014). Identity process theory: Identity, social action and social change. Cambridge University Press.
Jaspal, R., Lopes, B., Jamal, Z., Paccoud, I., & Sekhon, P. (2017). Sexual abuse and HIV-risk behaviour among black and minority ethnic men who have sex with men in the UK. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 20(8), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1414170
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the Use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral Studies – An Example from the Australian Film Industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 095–114. https://doi.org/10.28945/1429
Kartodirdjo, S. (2015). Pemberontakan petani banten 1888. Komunitas Bambu.
Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J. M., Rodriguez, M., & De Weerd, M. (2002). Identity Processes in Collective Action Participation: Farmers’ Identity and Farmers’ Protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00280
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
Lahlou, S., & Abric, J. C. (2011). What are the “elements” of a representation? Papers on Social Representations, Volume 20, 20.1-20.10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270686993_What_are_the_elements_of_a_representation
Laraña, E., Johnston, H., & Gusfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1994). New social movements: From ideology to identity. Temple University Press.
Locher, D. A. (2002). Collective behavior. Prentice Hall.
Macionis, J. J. (2018). Sociology (16th Ed.). Pearson.
Manfredo, M. J. (2008). Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues. Springer.
Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A., & Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the Social Sciences. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Hutchinson Radius.
Moloney, G., & Walker, I. (Eds.). (2007). Social representations and identity: Content, process and power (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On Social Representations. In Social Cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The Myth of the Lonely Paradigm: A Rejoinder. Social Research, 51(4), 939–967. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286387562_The_myth_of_the_lonely_paradigm_A_rejoinder
Moscovici, S., & Duveen, G. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press.
Newing, H. (Ed.). (2011). Conducting research in conservation: Social science methods and practice. Routledge.
Oni, C. K, & Basuni, S. (2019). Success story Rehabilitasi Ekosistem Mangrove di Pantai Karangsong Kabupaten Indramayu. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 9(3): 787-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.3.787-796
Permanadeli, R. (2015). Dadi wong wadon: Representasi sosial perempuan Jawa di era modern (Cetakan pertama). Pustaka Ifada : Rifka Anissa.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective Identity and Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (2005). Individuality and Social Influence in Groups: Inductive and Deductive Routes to Group Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747
Purnobasuki, H. (2005). Tinjauan perspektif hutan mangrove (Cet. ke-1). Airlangga University Press.
Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57648-0
Saunders, C. D. (2003). The Emerging Field of Conservation Psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 137–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24706965
Saunders, C. D., Brook, A. T., & Myers, O. E., Jr (2006). Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation biology: the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 20(3), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00435.x.
Silaen, V. (2006). Gerakan sosial baru: Perlawanan komunitas lokal pada kasus Indorayon di Toba Samosir (Cet. ke-1). IRE Press.
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
Sobary, M. (2016). Perlawanan politik & puitik petani tembakau Temanggung (Cet. ke-1). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Subono, N. I. (2017). Dari adat ke politik: Transformasi gerakan sosial di Amerika Latin. Marjin Kiri.
Sukmana, Oman. (2018). Lumpur Lapindo: Studi kasus gerakan sosial korban bencana lumpur Lapindo. Suluh Media.
Sukmana, O. (2017). Konsep dan teori gerakan sosial. UMM Press.
Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2010). Understanding the Diversity of Public Interests in Wildlife Conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (2007, February 9). The Greening of the World’s Religions. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(23). https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-greening-of-the-worlds-religions/
UNEP (2014). The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action. In van Bochove, J., Sullivan, E., Nakamura, T. (Eds). United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/the-importance-of-mangroves-to-people--a-call-to-action
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and Method of Social Representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00028
Whooley, O. (2007). Collective Identity. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc065
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The author transfers copyright to the journal by signing a copyright transfer agreement.
- The author retains patent and trademark rights, and rights to any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the article.
- The use of the articles by authors and end-users is governed by the CC BY-NC license (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License).