Integrating Digital Books, 3D Animations, and Online Problem-based Learning to Improve Pre-service Teachers’ Scientific Literacy in General Physics Course

Authors

  • Titin Sunarti Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Muhammad Satriawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Binar Kurnia Prahani Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Iqbal Ainur Rizki Victoria University of Wellington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v14n2.p169-183

Keywords:

digital book, 3D animation, problem-based learning, scientific literacy

Abstract

Some literature suggests that the low scientific literacy of pre-service teachers (PSTs) should be considered when designing teaching strategies. To address this issue, digital books with 3D animation, representing advanced developments in digital technology, can be integrated into an online Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model. Consequently, this study aimed to test the effectiveness of the Digital Books, 3D animation, and PBL (DBAPBL) model in enhancing the scientific literacy of PSTs. The research method employed was quantitative, utilizing a quasi-experimental design. The sample comprised 67 pre-service biology teachers enrolled in the General Physics course. Data collection technique utilised pre- and post-test along with survey in the last teaching session. Then, the data was analysed descriptively and statistically using t-test. The findings revealed that the DBAPBL model led to PSTs achieving a science literacy score above 89.5 or in the high category. Statistical test results also indicated a significant difference between scientific literacy's pre- and post-test results, affirming the model's effectiveness. Another noteworthy finding suggests that PSTs have a tendency to respond positively to the DBPAPBL model. This research implies a pedagogical innovation in physics education and advocates for updating curriculum guidelines related to the DBAPBL model, thereby contributing to the improvement of Indonesia's PISA scores.

References

Li Y and Guo M. Scientific Literacy in Communicating Science and Socio-Scientific Issues: Prospects and Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 758000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000.

Rusilowati A, Astuti B, and Rahman NA. How to Improve Student’s Scientific Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1170(1): 012028. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012028.

Roberts DA. Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy. In: Handbook of Research on Science Education. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2007.

DeBoer GE. Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000; 37(6): 582–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6%3C582::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-L.

Parno, Yuliati L, Hermanto FM, and Ali M. A Case Study on Comparison of High School Students’ Scientific Literacy Competencies Domain in Physics with Different Methods: PBL-Stem Education, PBL, and Conventional Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2020; 9(2): 159–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23894.

Yuliati L, Yogismawati F, Purwaningsih E, and Affriyenni Y. Concept Acquisition and Scientific Literacy of Physics Within Inquiry-Based Learning for STEM Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 1835(1): 012012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012012.

Halliday D, Walker J, and Resnick R. Fundamental of Physics. 10th ed. New York: John Wiley; 2014.

Suryawati E, Suzanti F, Zulfarina Z, Putriana AR, and Febrianti L. The Implementation of Local Environmental Problem-Based Learning Student Worksheets to Strengthen Environmental Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2020; 9(2): 169–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.22892.

Li X, Chen W, and Alrasheedi M. Challenges of The Collaborative Innovation System in Public Higher Education in The Era of Industry 4.0 Using an Integrated Framework. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2023; 8(4): 100430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100430.

Ulfatin N, Putra ABNR, Heong YM, Zahro A, and Rahmawati AD. Disruptive Learning Media Integrated E-Generator Practice System to Advance Self-Efficacy Learners Levels in Era of Education 4.0. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2022; 16(04): 4–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i04.28993.

Hayati MN. Integrated Science Digital Module Based on Scientific Literacy: Analyzing Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) Skills In Industry Revolution 4.0 Era. Unnes Science Education. 2019; 8(1): 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v8i1.29247.

Suprapto N. What Should Educational Reform in Indonesia Look Like?-Learning From the PISA Science Scores of East-Asian Countries and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 2016; 17(2): 8. Available from: https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v17_issue2/suprapto/index.htm.

Rusilowati A, Nugroho SE, Susilowati ESM, Mustika T, Harfiyani N, and Prabowo HT. The Development of Scientific Literacy Assessment to Measure Student’s Scientific Literacy Skills in Energy Theme. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 983(1): 012046. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012046.

Islami RAZE and Nuangchalerm P. Comparative Study of Scientific Literacy: Indonesian and Thai Pre-Service Science Teachers Report. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2020; 9(2): 261–268. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20355.

OECD. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.

Nur’aini D, Rahardjo SB, and Susanti VHE. Student’s Profile About Science Literacy in Surakarta. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1022(1): 012016. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012016.

Deta UA, Zulaiha P, Agustina R, Fadillah RN, Prakoso I, Lestari NA, et al. The Scientific Literacy Profile of Tsunami Disaster Mitigation of Non-Science Undergraduate Student in Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1417(1): 012095. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012095.

Junanto T, Akhyar M, Budiyono, and Suryani N. Profile of Undergraduate Students as Prospective Science Teachers in terms of Science Literacy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press; 2020: 398–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.158.

Nasor A, Lutfi AL, and Prahani BK. Science Literacy Profile of Junior High School Students on Context, Competencies, and Knowledge. IJORER International Journal of Recent Education Research. 2023; 4(6): 847–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.436.

Anggraeni DM, Prahani BK, Suprapto N, Shofiyah N, and Jatmiko B. Systematic Review of Problem Based Learning Research in Fostering Critical Thinking Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2023; 49: 101334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334.

Sharma S, Saragih ID, Tarihoran DETAU, and Chou FH. Outcomes of Problem-Based Learning in Nurse Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2023; 120: 105631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105631.

Wumu A, Mursalin, and Buhungo TJ. Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Model Assisted by Canva-Oriented Pancasila Student Profiles to Improve Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2023; 9(8): 5892–5898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4022.

Zheng QM, Li YY, Yin Q, Zhang N, Wang YP, Li GX, et al. The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Compared with Lecture-Based Learning in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2023; 23(1): 546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04531-7.

Tawfik AA and Lilly C. Using a Flipped Classroom Approach to Support Problem-Based Learning. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning. 2015; 20(3): 299–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9262-8.

Choi YR, Lee YN, Kim D, Park WH, Kwon DY, and Chang SO. An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20): 13371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013371.

Kusumawati AT, Wasis, Sanjaya IGM, and Kholiq A. Elite (E-Book Literacy) for Junior High School Student’s Scientific Literacy in Solar System Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1491(1): 012070. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012070.

Kholiq A. Development of B D F-AR 2 (Physics Digital Book Based Augmented Reality) to Train Students’ Scientific literacy on Global Warming Material. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika. 2020; 8(1): 50-58. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v8i1.7881.

Prahani BK, Rizki IA, Nisa’ K, Citra NF, Alhusni HZ, and Wibowo FC. Implementation of Online Problem-Based Learning Assisted by Digital Book With 3D Animations to Improve Student’s Physics Problem-Solving Skills in Magnetic Field Subject. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2022; 12(2): 379–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1590.

Prastyaningrum I and Pratama H. Problem-Based Learning Model for Three-Phase Induction Motor. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 2019; 9(1): 55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n1.p55-64.

Yusuf I and Widyaningsih SW. Implementing E-Learning-Based Virtual Laboratory Media to Students’ Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2020; 15(5): 63–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.12029.

Haryanti N, Wilujeng I, and Sundari S. Problem Based Learning Instruction Assisted by E-Book to Improve Mathematical Representation Ability and Curiosity Attitudes on Optical Devices. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1440(1): 012045. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012045.

Colmenares-Quintero RF, Caicedo-Concha DM, Rojas N, Stansfield KE, and Colmenares-Quintero JC. Problem Based Learning and Design Thinking Methodologies for Teaching Renewable Energy in Engineering Programs: Implementation in a Colombian University Context. Cogent Engineering. 2023; 10(1): 2164442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2164442.

Prastika MD, Wati M, and Suyidno S. The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Improving Students Scientific Literacy Skills and Scientific Attitudes. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika. 2019; 7(3): 194-204. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i3.7027.

Harjono A, Gunawan G, Adawiyah R, and Herayanti L. An Interactive e-Book for Physics to Improve Students’ Conceptual Mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2020; 15(05): 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.10967.

Adawiyah R, Harjono A, Gunawan G, and Hermansyah H. Interactive E-Book of Physics to Increase Students’ Creative Thinking Skills on Rotational Dynamics Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1153(1): 012117. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012117.

Sari SY, Rahim FR, Sundari PD, and Aulia F. The Importance of E-Books in Improving Students’ Skills in Physics Learning in the 21st Century: A Literature Review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022; 2309(1): 012061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012061.

Suprapto N, Ibisono HS, and Mubarok H. The Use of Physics Pocketbook Based on Augmented Reality on Planetary Motion to Improve Students’ Learning Achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2021; 11(2): 526–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1167.

Suprapto N and Nandyansah W. PicsAR: A Physics Visualisation to Enhance Students’ Thinking Skills in Abstract Concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 1805(1): 012024. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012024.

Cai S, Liu C, Wang T, Liu E, and Liang JC. Effects of Learning Physics Using Augmented Reality on Students’ Self-Efficacy and Conceptions of Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2021; 52(1): 235–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020.

Creswell JW and Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fifth. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2018.

Arends RI. Learning to Teach. Ninth. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2011.

Prahani BK, Ramadani AH, Kusumawati DH, Suprapto N, Munasir M, Madlazim M, et al. ORNE Learning Model to Improve Problem - Solving Skills of Physics Bachelor Candidates: An Alternative Learning in the Covid - 19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 2020; 10(01): 71–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n1.p71-80.

Sabrina F, Rachmadiarti F, and Sunarti T. Analysis of Scientific Literacy of Senior High School Students on Fluid Dynamics. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains). 2021; 11(1): 40–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p40-51.

Hake R. Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Indiana: Indiana University; 1999.

Adam AS and Suprapto N. One-Stop Physics E-Book Package Development for Senior High School Learning Media. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2019; 14(19): 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.10761.

Lauer L, Peschel M, Malone S, Altmeyer K, Brünken R, Javaheri H, et al. Real-Time Visualization of Electrical Circuit Schematics: An Augmented Reality Experiment Setup to Foster Representational Knowledge in Introductory Physics Education. In: Kuhn, J., Vogt, P. (eds) Smartphones as Mobile Minilabs in Physics. Switzrland: Springer, Cham; 2022: 335-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94044-7_56.

Ahied M, Muharrami LK, Fikriyah A, and Rosidi I. Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy Through Distance Learning with Augmented Reality-Based Multimedia Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2020; 9(4): 499–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26123.

Granić A and Marangunić N. Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019; 50(5): 2572–2593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.

Marangunić N and Granić A. Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2015; 14(1): 81–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.

Bouchey B, Castek J, and Thygeson J. Multimodal Learning. In: Ryoo J, Winkelmann K, editors. Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 35–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_3

Giannakos M and Cukurova M. The Role of Learning Theory in Multimodal Learning Analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023; 54(5): 1246–1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13320.

Firdausy BA, Prasetyo ZK. Improving Scientific Literacy Through an Interactive E-Book: A Literature Review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1440(1): 012080. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012080.

Zulfawati Z, Mayasari T, and Handhika J. The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Model Integrated STEM Approach in Improving the Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 2022; 12(1): 76–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v12n1.p76-91.

Valdez JE and Bungihan ME. Problem-Based Learning Approach Enhances the Problem Solving Skills in Chemistry of High School Students. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 2019; 9(3): 282–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.631.

Simanjuntak MP, Hutahaean J, Marpaung N, and Ramadhani D. Effectiveness of problem-Based Learning Combined with Computer Simulation on Students’ Problem-Solving and Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction. 2021; 14(3): 519–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14330a.

Nurtanto M, Nurhaji S, Widjanarko D, Wijaya MBR, and Sofyan H. Comparison of Scientific Literacy in Engine Tune-up Competencies through Guided Problem-Based Learning and Non-Integrated Problem-Based Learning in Vocational Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1114(1): 012038. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012038.

Supahar and Widodo E. The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Application of Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Science Literacy and Problem-Solving Skills. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020). 2021: 633–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.092.

Schunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2011.

Putranta H, Jumadi J, and Wilujeng I. Physics Learning by PhET Simulation-Assisted Using Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Work and Energy Chapters in MAN 3 Sleman. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 2019; 20(1): 3. Available from: https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v20_issue1_files/putranta.pdf.

Jatmiko B, Prahani BK, Munasir, Supardi ZAI, Wicaksono I, Erlina N, et al. The Comparison of OR-IPA Teaching Model and Problem Based Learning Model Effectiveness to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2018; 17(2): 300–319. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.300.

Luo YZ, Xiao YM, Ma YY, and Li C. Discussion of Students’ E-book Reading Intention with the Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 752118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752188.

Kipp M. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Acceptance and Use of an E-Learning Platform. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(21): 11372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111372.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Sunarti, T. (2024) “Integrating Digital Books, 3D Animations, and Online Problem-based Learning to Improve Pre-service Teachers’ Scientific Literacy in General Physics Course ”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 14(2), pp. 169–183. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v14n2.p169-183.

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0