Designing of Environmental Physics Course Instruments about Ocean Wave Energy to Enhance Students' Creative Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Muhammad Satriawan STKIP Bima
  • Liliasari Liliasari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Wawan Setiawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ade Gafar Abdullah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p1-15

Keywords:

environmental physics course, OWC, creative thinking skills

Abstract

Various factors become obstacles to developing renewable energy technology, including people's low knowledge of renewable energy and low 21st-century skills. Therefore, designing learning that can increase understanding of renewable energy and improve 21st-century skills simultaneously is essential. This study aimed to create programs of environmental physics lectures about OWC as a renewable energy source. This research was developmental research with analysis, design, and development stages. The products in this study were test instruments to measure creative thinking skills, OWC converters prototype, and a project-based lecture program oriented towards providing creative thinking skills through a combination of lectures in the classroom, laboratory, and marine environment. Five experts validated all products. In addition, besides experts' validation, the creative thinking test instrument was tested on 17 students who had taken environmental physics lectures. In contrast, a marine engineering laboratory tested the prototype at a university in Bandung. Experts' validity data were analyzed using the content validity ratio, while the test instrument data were calculated for reliability, validity, discrimination, and difficulty levels. Based on the results of expert validation, all products are feasible to be implemented. Based on the test results, the prototype developed functions well, while for the test instrument of 10 questions developed, only eight questions were eligible to be used. All of the products produced can be used as a reference and reference for lecturers or teachers who develop learning about renewable energy and equip students with creative thinking skills.

References

Chiu S, Wang J, Wang S, and Chao SD. Enhancement of Sea Wave Potential Energy with Under-Sea Periodic Structures: A Simulation and Laboratory Study. Applied Sciences. 2017; 7(8): 782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080782.

Sjolte J, Tjensvoll G, and Molinas M. Power Collection from Wave Energy Farms. Applied Sciences. 2013; 3(2): 420–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app3020420.

Espindola RL and Araújo AM. Wave Energy Resource of Brazil: An Analysis from 35 Years of ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8): e0183501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183501.

Melikoglu M. Current Status and Future of Ocean Energy Sources: A Global Review. Ocean Engineering. 2018; 148: 563–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.045.

Borthwick AGL. Marine Renewable Energy Seascape. Engineering. 2016; 2(1): 69–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.011.

Weber J, Mouwen F, Parish A, and Robertson D. Wavebob – Research & Development Network and Tools in the Context of Systems Engineering. 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2009). 2009: 416–420. Available from: https://tethys-engineering.pnnl.gov/publications/wavebob-research-development-network-tools-context-systems-engineering.

Frid C, Andonegi E, Depestele J, Judd A, Rihan D, Rogers SI, and Kenchington E. The Environmental Interactions of Tidal and Wave Energy Generation Devices. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2012; 32(1): 133–139. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.002.

Gumbira G and Harsanto B. Decision Support System for an Eco-Friendly Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 2019; 9(4): 1177-1182. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.9484.

Rizal AM, Ningsih NS, Sofian I, Hanifah FN, and Hilmi I. Preliminary Study of Wave Energy Resource Assessment and Its Seasonal Variation Along the Southern Coasts of Java, Bali, and Nusa Tenggara Waters. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 2019; 11(1): 014502. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1063/1.5034161.

Zikra M. Preliminary Assessment of Wave Energy Potential around Indonesia Sea. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2017; 862: 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.862.55.

Irhas and Suryaningsih R. Study on wave Energy Into Electricity in the South Coast of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Energy Procedia. 2014; 47: 149–155. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.208.

Mälkki H and Alanne K. An Overview of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Research-Based Teaching in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 69; 218-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.176.

Hammad B, Al-Zoubi A, and Castro M. Harnessing technology in collaborative renewable energy education. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2020; 41(10), 1118-1125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1501751.

Buldur S, Bursal M, Erik N Y, and Yucel E. The Impact of an Outdoor Education Project on Middle School Students’ Perceptions and Awareness of the Renewable Energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020; 134: 110364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110364.

Grivokostopoulou F, Perikos I, Kovas K, and Hatzilygeroudis, I. Learning Approaches in a 3D Virtual Environment for Learning Energy Generation from Renewable Sources. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 2016: 497-500. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS16/paper/view/12941.

Stroth C, Knecht R, Günther A, Behrendt T, and Golba M. (2018). From Experiential to Research-Based Learning: The Renewable Energy Online (REO) Master’s Program. Solar Energy. 2018; 173; 425-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.067.

Friman H. New Trends in the Higher Education: Renewable Energy at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering. Energy Procedia. 2017; 115: 18-28. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.003.

Afkar M, Jebreilzadeh M, Gavagsaz-Ghoachani R, and Phattanasak M. A Teaching Method Based on Storytelling of a Student Social Activity in Renewable Energy Education. 2019 6th International Conference on Technical Education (ICTechEd6). 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTechEd6.2019.8790890.

Susanty M, Yunita A, and Setiawan E. Establishing Requirement in Teaching New and Renewable Energy. Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer. 2019; 10(2), 623-630. Available from: https://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/simet/article/view/3368.

Keçebaş A and Alkan M. The Education and Training of Renewable Energy Resources for Sustainable Development in Turkey. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 1(1): 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.209990.

Nowotny J, Dodson J, Fiechter S, Gür TM, Kennedy B, Macyk W, Bak T, Sigmund W, Yamawaki M, and Rahman KA. Towards Global Sustainability: Education on Environmentally Clean Energy Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 81(2): 2541-2551. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.060.

Chandrasekaran S Feasibility Study on Machine‐Learning‐Based Hybrid Renewable Energy Applications for Engineering Education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2020; 29(2): 465-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22237.

Theodorou P, Kydonakis P, Botzori M, and Skanavis C. Augmented Reality Proves to be a Breakthrough in Environmental Education. Protection and Restoration of the Environment XIV. 2018; 7: 219-228. Available from: http://pre14.civil.auth.gr/images/DownLoads/03-PRE-XIV_Book-of-Proceedings.pdf.

Huynh T, Hou G, and Wang J. Communicating Wave Energy : An Active Learning Experience for Students. American Journal of Engineering Education. 2016; 7(1): 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v7i1.9684.

Satriawan M, Liliasari S, and Setiawan W. Wave Energy Concept Mastery Relate on Creative Thinking Skills of the Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Environmental Physics Lectures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1157(3): 032044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032044.

Noor NM, Aziz M, Mohamed S, Moh E, Abdullah H, and Yon H. Measuring the Content Validity of Mepi Using Content Validity Ratio. Journal of ICT in Education. 2016; 3(1): 81–8. Available from: https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JICTIE/article/view/2610.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2010.

Hake RR. Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousandstudent Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics. 1998; 66(1): 64–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.

Buck Institute for Education. Project Based Learning Handbook. 2nd Edition. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education; 2003.

Guilford JP. Creativity: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 1967; 1(1): 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x.

Eragamreddy N. Teaching Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies. 2013; 1(2): 97-105. Available from: http://www.eltsjournal.org/archive/value1%20issue2/10-1-2-13.pdf.

Rismawati, Sunarno W, and Sarwanto. The Effect of Project Based Learning on Learning Environment and Learning Outcomes in Vocational High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1307: 012010. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1307/1/012010.

Han S, Capraro R, and Capraro MM. How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact Of Student Factors on Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2015; 13(5): 1089-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0.

Muchsin M and Mariati M. Application of Project Based Learning Models in Improving Creative Thinking of Students at Physics Lessons in SMA Bandar Baru. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020; 3(2): 1453-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.1008.

Viana RV, Jumadi, Wilujeng I, and Kuswanto H. The Influence of Project Based Learning based on Process Skills Approach to Student’s Creative Thinking Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1233: 012033. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012033.

Verawati NNSP. Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa melalui Pengembangan Program Pembelajaran Fisika menggunakan Model Inkuiri. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika. 2013; 1(2): 125-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v1i2.208.

Apriliyanti DD, Haryani S, and Widiyatmoko A. Pengembangan Alat Peraga IPA Terpadu pada Tema Pemisahan Campuran untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Unnes Science Education Journal. 2015; 4(2): 836-841. Available from: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/article/view/7916.

Sahidu H, Gunawan G, Rokhmat J, and Rahayu S. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi Pada Kreativitas Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2018; 4(1): 1-6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i1.442.

Gunawan G, Sahidu H, Harjono A, and Suranti NMY. The Effect of Project Based Learning with Virtual Media Assistance on Student's Creativity in Physics. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2017; 2: 167-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13514.

Hanif S, Wijaya AFC, and Winarno N. Enhancing Students' Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning. 2019; 2(2): 50-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271.

Putranta H and Supahar S. Development of Physics-Tier Tests (PysTT) to Measure Students' Conceptual Understanding and Creative Thinking Skills: A Qualitative Synthesis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2019; 7(3): 697-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.587203.

Pratama H and Prastyaningrum I. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikrohidro Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 2016; 6(2): 44-50. DOI: http://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v6n2.p44-50.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-15

How to Cite

Satriawan, M., Liliasari, L., Setiawan, W. and Abdullah, A. G. (2021) “Designing of Environmental Physics Course Instruments about Ocean Wave Energy to Enhance Students’ Creative Thinking Skills”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(1), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p1-15.

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 775 , PDF Downloads: 29