Developing Teaching Material for Physics Based on Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model to Improve Scientific Creativity of Junior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v8n2.p91-105Keywords:
teaching material for Physics, collaborative creativity learning model, scientific creativityAbstract
The teaching material for Physics based on collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model is by design to improve scientific creativity, collaborative skills, and science process skills of junior high school students. The focus of this research is to analyze the teaching materials based on CCL model in terms of their validity (content and construct, reliable) and effectiveness to improve students scientific creativity in the science lesson, particularly for Physics education. The validity and effectiveness of the teaching material were measured by using Validation Assessment Sheet (VAS) and Scientific Creativity Assessment Sheet (SCAS). The data were analysed through mean validity score, Cronbachs coefficient alpha, Wilcoxon test, N-gain, and Mann Whitney test. The results of this study include: (1) validity of the the CCL-based teaching materials for Physics fulfill validity criteria (valid and reliable); (2) in terms of components of validity, the CCL-based teaching materials for Physics: (a) there is an increase of students scientific creativity with the alpha of α = 0.05, (b) the average score of students scientific creativity was in medium category, and (c) there is no significant different improvement (consistent) of scientific creativity skills in all groups. The implication of this developmental research of CCL-based teaching materials for Physics has proven to be valid and effective to increase the scientific creativity of junior high school students, particularly in Motions and Simple Machine chapters.
References
Yia X, Plucker JA, and Guo J. Modeling Influences on Divergent Thinking and Artistic Creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2015; 16: 62-68. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.002.
Prayogi S, Yuanita L, and Wasis. Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2018; 15(1): 43-56. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325019447_Critical_Inquiry_Based_Learning_A_Model_of_Learning_to_Promote_Critical_Thinking_Among_Prospective_Teachers_of_Physic.
Jatmiko B, Widodo W, Martini, Budiyanto M, Wicaksono I, and Pandiangan P. Effectiveness of the INQF-based on Learning on a General Physics for Improving Students Learning Outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2016; 15(4): 441-451. Avalable from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol15/441-451.Jatmiko_JBSE_Vol.15_No.4.pdf.
Pandiangan P, Sanjaya GMI, and Jatmiko B. The Validity and Effectiveness of Physics Independent Learning Model to Improve Physics Problem Solving and Self-directed Learning Skills of Students in Open and Distance Education Systems. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(5): 651-665. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/601.
Siswanto J, Susantini E and Jatmiko B Practicality and Effectiveness of the IBMR Teaching Model to Improve Physics Problem Solving Skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2018; 17(3): 381-394. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/669.
Siswanto J, Susantini E, and Jatmiko B. Multi-representation Based on Scientific Investigation for Enhancing Students Representation Skills. Journal Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 983: 012034. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012034.
Prayogi S, Yuanita L, and Wasis. Critical-inquiry-based-learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers. Journal Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 947: 012013. DOI: https://dx.xoi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013.
Zulkarnaen, Supardi ZAI, and Jatmiko B. Feasibility of Creative Exploration, Creative Elaboration, Creative Modeling, Practice Scientific Creativity, Discussion, Reflection (C3PDR) Teaching Model to Improve Students Scientific Creativity of Junior High School. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(6): 1020-1034. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/629.
Wicaksono I, Wasis, and Madlazim. The Effectiveness of Virtual Science Teaching Model (VS-TM) to Improve Students Scientific Creativity and Concept Mastery on Senior High School Physics Subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(4): 549-561. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/588.
Ayas MB and Sak U. Objective Measure of Scientiï¬c Creativity: Psychometric Validity of the Creative Scientiï¬c Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014; 13: 195-205. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001.
Hu W and Adey P. A Scientific Creativity Test for Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education. 2010; 24(4): 389-403. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912.
Hu W, Wu B, Jia X, Yi X, Duan C, Meyer W, and Kaufman JC. Increasing Students Scientiï¬c Creativity: The œLearn to Think Intervention Program. The Journal of Creative Behaviour. 2013; 47(1): 3-21. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.
Kang D, Park J, and Hong H. Changes in the Number of Ideas Depending on Time When Conducting Scientific Creativity Activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2015; 14(4): 448-459. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol14/448-459.Kang_JBSE_Vol.14_No.4.pdf.
Raj H and Saxena DR. Scientific Creativity: A Review of Researches. European Academic Research. 2016; 4(2): 1122-1138. Available from: http://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/2494.pdf.
Siew NM, Chong CL, and Chin KO. Developing a Scientific Creativity Test for Fifth Graders. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2014; 62: 109-123. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/937.
Astutik S. Pengembangan model collaborative creativity untuk meningkatkan kreativitas ilmiah dan afektif collaborative siswa SMP. Master Thesis. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2017.
Astutik S, Nur M, and Susantini E. Validity of Collaborative Creativity (CC) Models. The 3 International Conferences on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 2016; 73-78.
Astutik S, Nur M, and Susantini E. Development of the Hypothetical Model to Teach the Skills of Scientific Creativity Students in Learning Science. The National Conference on Research, Reform of education in the entering Asean Community (AEC). Universitas Jember. 2015; 959-968.
Hake RR. Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics. 1998; 66: 64-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Sevilla CG, Ochave JA, Punsalan TG, Regala BP, and Uriarte GG. An Introduction to Research Methods. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company; 1984.
Purwaningsih E. Model CoMCoRe-LS (Concept Mapping Content Representations with Lesson Study) untuk Meningkatkan Pedagogical Content KNOWLEDGE (PCK) Calon Guru Fisika. Master Theses. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2018.
Plomp T. Preparing Education for the Information Society: The Need for New Knowledge and Skills. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments. 2013; 1(1): 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.051651.
Pandiangan P. Model Physics Independent Learning dalam Face to Face Tutorial untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika dan Keterampilan Belajar Mandiri Mahasiswa pada Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh. Master Thesis. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2018.
Fraenkel J, Wallen N, and Hyun H. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
Yasir M, Ibrahim M, and Widodo W. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Metakognitif untuk Melatihkan Kejujuran Siswa. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. 2015; 20(2): 163-175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.580.
Habibbulloh M, Jatmiko B, and Wahono W. The Development of Learning Media in Guided Discovery Learning Model Based on Virtual Lab to Reduce Students Misconception in Vocational High School on Photoelectric Effect Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 2017; 7(1): 27-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v7n1.p27-43.
Moreno R. Educational Psychology. New Mexico: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.
Solso RL, MacLin OH, and MacLin MK. Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Pearson Education; 2008.
Slavin ER. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson; 2011.
Arends RI. Learning to Teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill Companies; 2012.
Aktamis H and Ergin O. The Effect Scientific Process Skills Education on Students Scientific Creativity, Science Attitudes, and Academic Achievement. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 2008; 9(1): 1-21. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/48b6/bcf9168b22e5aa956facc61e74327faf0cdf.pdf.
Vass E, Littleton K, Miells D, and Jones A. The Discourse of Collaborative Creativity Writing: Peer Collaboration as a Context for Mutual Inspiration. Thinking Skill and Creativity Journal. 2008; 3(3): 192-202. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.001.
Prayogi S, Yuanita L, and Wasis. Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2018; 15(1): 43-56. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325019447_Critical_Inquiry_Based_Learning_A_Model_of_Learning_to_Promote_Critical_Thinking_Among_Prospective_Teachers_of_Physic.
Jatmiko B, Widodo W, Martini, Budiyanto M, Wicaksono I, and Pandiangan P. Effectiveness of the INQF-based on Learning on a General Physics for Improving Students Learning Outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2016; 15(4): 441-451. Avalable from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol15/441-451.Jatmiko_JBSE_Vol.15_No.4.pdf.
Pandiangan P, Sanjaya GMI, and Jatmiko B. The Validity and Effectiveness of Physics Independent Learning Model to Improve Physics Problem Solving and Self-directed Learning Skills of Students in Open and Distance Education Systems. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(5): 651-665. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/601.
Siswanto J, Susantini E and Jatmiko B Practicality and Effectiveness of the IBMR Teaching Model to Improve Physics Problem Solving Skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2018; 17(3): 381-394. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/669.
Siswanto J, Susantini E, and Jatmiko B. Multi-representation Based on Scientific Investigation for Enhancing Students Representation Skills. Journal Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 983: 012034. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012034.
Prayogi S, Yuanita L, and Wasis. Critical-inquiry-based-learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers. Journal Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 947: 012013. DOI: https://dx.xoi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013.
Zulkarnaen, Supardi ZAI, and Jatmiko B. Feasibility of Creative Exploration, Creative Elaboration, Creative Modeling, Practice Scientific Creativity, Discussion, Reflection (C3PDR) Teaching Model to Improve Students Scientific Creativity of Junior High School. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(6): 1020-1034. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/629.
Wicaksono I, Wasis, and Madlazim. The Effectiveness of Virtual Science Teaching Model (VS-TM) to Improve Students Scientific Creativity and Concept Mastery on Senior High School Physics Subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16(4): 549-561. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/588.
Ayas MB and Sak U. Objective Measure of Scientiï¬c Creativity: Psychometric Validity of the Creative Scientiï¬c Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014; 13: 195-205. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001.
Hu W and Adey P. A Scientific Creativity Test for Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education. 2010; 24(4): 389-403. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912.
Hu W, Wu B, Jia X, Yi X, Duan C, Meyer W, and Kaufman JC. Increasing Students Scientiï¬c Creativity: The œLearn to Think Intervention Program. The Journal of Creative Behaviour. 2013; 47(1): 3-21. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.
Kang D, Park J, and Hong H. Changes in the Number of Ideas Depending on Time When Conducting Scientific Creativity Activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2015; 14(4): 448-459. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol14/448-459.Kang_JBSE_Vol.14_No.4.pdf.
Raj H and Saxena DR. Scientific Creativity: A Review of Researches. European Academic Research. 2016; 4(2): 1122-1138. Available from: http://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/2494.pdf.
Siew NM, Chong CL, and Chin KO. Developing a Scientific Creativity Test for Fifth Graders. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2014; 62: 109-123. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/937.
Astutik S. Pengembangan model collaborative creativity untuk meningkatkan kreativitas ilmiah dan afektif collaborative siswa SMP. Master Thesis. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2017.
Astutik S, Nur M, and Susantini E. Validity of Collaborative Creativity (CC) Models. The 3 International Conferences on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 2016; 73-78.
Astutik S, Nur M, and Susantini E. Development of the Hypothetical Model to Teach the Skills of Scientific Creativity Students in Learning Science. The National Conference on Research, Reform of education in the entering Asean Community (AEC). Universitas Jember. 2015; 959-968.
Hake RR. Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics. 1998; 66: 64-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Sevilla CG, Ochave JA, Punsalan TG, Regala BP, and Uriarte GG. An Introduction to Research Methods. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company; 1984.
Purwaningsih E. Model CoMCoRe-LS (Concept Mapping Content Representations with Lesson Study) untuk Meningkatkan Pedagogical Content KNOWLEDGE (PCK) Calon Guru Fisika. Master Theses. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2018.
Plomp T. Preparing Education for the Information Society: The Need for New Knowledge and Skills. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments. 2013; 1(1): 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.051651.
Pandiangan P. Model Physics Independent Learning dalam Face to Face Tutorial untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika dan Keterampilan Belajar Mandiri Mahasiswa pada Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh. Master Thesis. Unpublished. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa; 2018.
Fraenkel J, Wallen N, and Hyun H. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
Yasir M, Ibrahim M, and Widodo W. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Metakognitif untuk Melatihkan Kejujuran Siswa. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. 2015; 20(2): 163-175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.580.
Habibbulloh M, Jatmiko B, and Wahono W. The Development of Learning Media in Guided Discovery Learning Model Based on Virtual Lab to Reduce Students Misconception in Vocational High School on Photoelectric Effect Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya. 2017; 7(1): 27-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v7n1.p27-43.
Moreno R. Educational Psychology. New Mexico: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.
Solso RL, MacLin OH, and MacLin MK. Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Pearson Education; 2008.
Slavin ER. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson; 2011.
Arends RI. Learning to Teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill Companies; 2012.
Aktamis H and Ergin O. The Effect Scientific Process Skills Education on Students Scientific Creativity, Science Attitudes, and Academic Achievement. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 2008; 9(1): 1-21. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/48b6/bcf9168b22e5aa956facc61e74327faf0cdf.pdf.
Vass E, Littleton K, Miells D, and Jones A. The Discourse of Collaborative Creativity Writing: Peer Collaboration as a Context for Mutual Inspiration. Thinking Skill and Creativity Journal. 2008; 3(3): 192-202. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.001.
Downloads
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
Astutik, S. and Prahani, B. K. (2018) “Developing Teaching Material for Physics Based on Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model to Improve Scientific Creativity of Junior High School Students”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 8(2), pp. 91–105. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v8n2.p91-105.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the JPFA with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
Abstract views: 1912
,
PDF Downloads: 960
