• M Madlazim



Coulomb stress changes, trigger, aftershocks


Coulomb stress change analysis has been applied to understand whether the 2013/07/02 (Mw=6.1) has been triggered by 2013/01/21 earthquake (Mw=6.1) the proximity to failure on the Aceh segment of Sumatra Fault Zone (SFZ). We examine the problem of how one earthquake might trigger another using Coulomb stress changes plotting. To plot the Coulomb stress changes, we used Global CMT data for the both earthquakes and used GEOFON data for manually revised epicenters of its aftershocks. The earthquakes are located on Aceh segment of the historic no recorded large earthquake. Coulomb stress changes modeling of the both earthquakes and plot their aftershocks. Surprisingly, the 2013/07/02 earthquake is located on increasing Coulomb stress changes region of 2013/01/21 earthquake plotting. Here explain that the 2013/07/02 earthquake has been triggered by the 2013/01/21 earthquake. Further, the two aftershocks of the 2013/07/02 earthquake is located on increasing Coulomb stress changes region of 2013/07/02 earthquake plotting. So that, the aftershocks has been triggered by increasing Coulomb stress changes of the 2013/07/02 earthquake.


King, G.C.P., Stein, R.S., and Lin, J. 1994. Static Stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, pp. 935-953.

Das, S. and Scholz, C. H. 1991. Off-fault aftershock clusters caused by shear-stress increase. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 71, 16691675.

Harris, R. 1998. Introduction to special section: Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implication for seismic hazard,

King, G. C. P. and Cocco, M.. 2000. Fault interaction by elastic stress changes: New clues from earthquake sequences. Adv. Geophys., 44, 138.

Nalbant, S. S., Hubert, A. and King, G. C. P. 1998. Stress coupling between earthquakes in northwest Turkey and the north Aegean Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 1998, 103, 24,46924,486.

Shikha Rajput, V. K., Gahalaut and Vipul K., Sahu. 2005. Coulomb stress changes and aftershocks of recent Indian earthquakes. CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 88, NO. 4.

Weatherley, D. 2006. Coulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering in Australia, Canberra 24-26 November 2006.

Parsons, T., Toda, S., Stein, R.S., Barka, A. and Dieterich, J.H. 2000. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: An interaction-based probability calculation, Science, 288, pp. 661-665.

Natawidjaya D.H. 2007. The Sumatran Fault Zone - from Source to Hazard, Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 1, 2147

Madlazim, Santosa, Bagus Jaya, M. Lees, Jonathan and U., Widya. 2010. Earthquake Source Parameters at Sumatran Fault Zone: Identification of the Activated Fault Plane, Cent. Eur. J. Geosci.,2(4),2010.DOI:10.2478/v10085-010-0016-5.

Okada, Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82, pp. 1018-1040.

Toda, S. and Stein, R. S. 2000. Did stress triggering cause the large offfault aftershocks of the 25 March 1998 Mw = 8.1 Antarctic plate earthquake?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 23012304.




How to Cite

Madlazim, M. (2015) “COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5(1), pp. 9–14. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v5n1.p9-14.



Abstract views: 1057 , PDF Downloads: 589