Teachers’ Perceptions of Providing Feedback in Application-Based Writing EFL Classrooms

Authors

  • Triyuana Nikmatul Fadzilah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus
  • Nuskhan Abid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v7n1.p15-27

Keywords:

App-Based Feedback, Digital Learning, EFL Writing, Feedback Strategies, Teacher Perception

Abstract

This study aims to explore EFL teachers’ experiences with app-based feedback, specifically how they perceive its benefits, address the challenges, and employ strategies in this practice. This study employs a phenomenological qualitative design to explore teachers’ experiences and interpretations of using apps to provide feedback in writing classes. The research participants were EFL lecturers at a state Islamic university in Central Java, selected through purposive sampling based on their experience in teaching writing and using app-based feedback. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions and analyzed using thematic analysis. The results revealed three main themes: (1) the benefits of using applications to provide feedback in EFL writing classes, (2) challenges in implementing application-based feedback in EFL writing classes, and (3) teachers’ strategies for providing application-based feedback in EFL writing classes. The findings indicate that the app facilitates the provision of more detailed, structured, and easily accessible feedback to students. However, there are several challenges, including time constraints, technical difficulties, variations in students’ digital literacy, and potential misunderstandings about written feedback. To address these issues, teachers employ various strategies, such as focused feedback, a combination of direct and indirect feedback, and balanced feedback that combines corrective comments with praise. Overall, this study indicates that using the app can enhance the effectiveness of feedback delivery; however, its success remains dependent on technological readiness and appropriate pedagogical strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajabshir, Z. F., & Ebadi, S. (2023). The Effects of Automatic Writing Evaluation and Teacher‑Focused Feedback on CALF Measures and Overall Quality of L2 Writing Across Different Genres. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 26(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00201-9

Alamri, B. (2021). Challenges of Implementing Technology in ESL Writing Classrooms : A Case Study. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n12p36

Alamri, S. (2022). A case study of the feedback on academic writing of EFL english major students in the saudi university context (Order No. 30216074). Available from ProQuest Central Premium. (2732166239). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/case-study-feedback-on-academic-writing-efl/docview/2732166239/se-2

Albogami, M. M. (2020). An Inquiry into Effective Written Feedback from EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives at a Saudi University. University of Exeter.

Beardsley, M., Albó, L., Aragón, P., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2021). Emergency Education Effects on Teacher Abilities and Motivation to Use Digital Technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13101

Carter, S. M., Shih, P., Williams, J., Degeling, C., & Mooney-Somers, J. (2021). Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14(6), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w

Charalampous, A., & Darra, M. (2023). The Contribution of Teacher Feedback to Learners ‘Work Revision: A Systematic Literature Review. World Journal of Education, 13(3), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n3p40

Cheng, X., Zhang, L. J., & Yan, Q. (2025). Exploring Teacher Written Feedback in EFL Writing Classrooms: Beliefs and Practices in Interaction. Language Teaching Research, 29(1), 385–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211057665

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (3rd (ed.)). Sage publications.

Dahal, B. (2024). Participants’ Right to Withdraw from Research: Researchers’ Lived Experiences on Ethics of Withdrawal. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09513-y

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering Research, 10(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319

Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL Students’ Perception on the Use of Grammarly and Teacher Feedback. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.849

Farshi, S. S., & Safa, S. K. (2015). The Effect of Two Types of Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing Skill. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.26

Gonzalez-torres, P., & Sarango, C. (2023). Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback in EFL Writing : A Case of High School Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.5

Hoa, N. T. N., & Lap, T. Q. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Peer Feedback and Teacher Feedback Using Google Docs on Efl Students’ Writing Performance. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10), 15–45. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3926

Ilie, V. (2024). The Impact of Feedback on Students’ Academic Performance. Analele Universității Din Craiova, Seria Psihologie-Pedagogie, 46(2), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.52846/AUCPP.2024.2.14

Khidhir, R. J., & Rassul, T. H. (2023). Assessing the Validity of Experts’ Value Judgment over Research Instruments. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 27(948), 324–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.5.21

Kirana, S. N., & Gupta, Y. M. (2023). Advanced Writing Courses through Online Learning : Thai EFL Learners ‘ Perception. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 9(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v9i1.28001

Lefroy, J., Roberts, N., Molyneux, A., Bartlett, M., Gay, S., & McKinley, R. (2017). Utility of An App-Based System to Improve Feedback Following Workplace-Based Assessment. International Journal of Medical Education, 8, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5910.dc69

Maleki, A. (2025). Towards a More Equitable Education: A Lens Into EFL Teachers’ Pedagogical Barriers in Online Assessments. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 44(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2438127

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis : Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nurfaidah, S. (2021). Focused Written Corrective Feedback: EFL Students’ Engagement in Online Asynchronous Platform. Al-Ta’dib: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.31332/atdbwv14i2.3729

Pappa, C. I., Georgiou, D., & Pittich, D. (2024). Technology Education in Primary Schools : Addressing Teachers ‘ Perceptions, Perceived Barriers, and Needs. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(2), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09828-8

Priyantin, T. (2021). Technology-Supported Peer Feedback: A Literature Review. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Studies (JET Li), 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.55215/jetli.v3i1.3413

Putri, Y. A., Hadiyanto, A. K., & Mali, Y. C. G. (2024). EFL Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of Electronic Written Feedback in Academic Writing Classes. Journal of English and Education, 10(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v10i2.35245

Reinoso, J. V. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review: Direct and Indirect Feedback Strategies in EFL Contexts. REFLections, 30(3), 866–886. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i3.268895

Shahab, M. L., & Saeed, K. M. (2024). Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Lecturers’ Perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 29(10), 2582–2603. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7147

Singhkum, S. (2023). Effects of Electronic Feedback on EFL Learners’ Second Language Writing. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(01), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-05

Sofi-Karim, M., Bali, A. O., & Rached, K. (2023). Online Education Via Media Platforms and Applications as an Innovative Teaching Method. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11188-0

Stahl, D. J. (2021). Secondary Classroom Teachers’ Beliefs and Decision Making Regarding the Use of Feedback to Improve Student Learning. University of St. Thomas, Minnesota.

Watson, A. (2025). A Postmodernist Qualitative Research Approach: Choosing Between Descriptive and Interpretive Phenomenology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(10), 6968–6973. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16730

Williams, A. (2024). Delivering Effective Student Feedback in Higher Education: An Evaluation of the Challenges and Best Practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 10(2), 437–501. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3404

Yang, L. F., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Teacher Feedback on EFL Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Writing Strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101015

Yildiz, H., & Gonen, S. I. K. (2024). Automated Writing Evaluation System for Feedback in the Digital World: An Online Learning Opportunity for English as a Foreign Language Students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1169727

Zou, D., Xie, H., & Lee, F. (2023). Effects of Technology Enhanced Peer, Teacher and Self-Feedback on Students’ Collaborative Writing, Critical Thinking Tendency and Engagement in Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.