Student Perceptions: Challenges and Opportunities of Using Grammarly on Thesis Writing

Authors

  • NIKMATUZ ZUHRIAH Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia
  • MOHAMMAD FATONI Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia
  • NANIN VERINA WIDYA PUTRI Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia
  • MOH. ZAINUDDIN Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri, Bojonegoro, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v5n2.p91-101

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Grammarly, Perceptions, Thesis Writing

Abstract

Writing skills in English are considered challenging, particularly in academic contexts like thesis writing, where effective organization and expression are crucial. Many students used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, such as Grammarly, to enhance their grammar, punctuation, and spelling. This research explored EFL students' perceptions of Grammarly in thesis writing, focusing on both the opportunities and challenges associated with its use and their responses to those. The study was conducted with final-year students at a reputable university who used Grammarly's free version, employing a qualitative design and using semi-structured interviews to get the data. Findings indicated that student perceptions of Grammarly were positive for its user-friendliness, instant feedback, and efficiency in addressing grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. The opportunities identified include immediate feedback, consistent evaluation, additional correction insights, and improved writing efficiency, all contributing positively to thesis writing quality. However, challenges such as over-reliance on AI, the necessity for manual rechecking, limitations of the free version, difficulties with tense detection, and internet connectivity issues were also reported. Students generally appreciate Grammarly's suggestion in correcting grammatical and technical challenges but have varied responses to its challenges, with some continuing to use the tool despite its shortcomings and others using similar alternative options. Suggestions for further research include comparing Grammarly with other writing assistance tools in the context of thesis writing and using quantitative methods to better assess its effectiveness. Future studies could develop diverse research instruments to enrich the findings of this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhaysony, M., & Alhaisoni, E. (2017). EFL Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions of Grammatical Difficulties. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.188

Ambarwati, E. K. (2021). Indonesian university students’ appropriating Grammarly for formative feedback. ELT in Focus, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v4i1.5216

Armanda, M. L., Nugraheni, A. F., Wulansari, A., & Imron, A. (2022). “Grammarly” as English Writing Assistant from EFL Students’ Perspective. English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i2.17988

Cauring, A. M., Sama, N. A., Boreros, S. L. N., & Panansaran, A. S. (2023). Perception on The Utilization of Grammarly Application to Enhance Students’ Research Writing Skills. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392995

Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), 223. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320618419

Chen, C. F. E., & Cheng, W. Y. E. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in efl writing classes. Language Learning and Technology, 12(2), 94–112.

Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students’ Perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Fitria, R. A., Sabarun, S., & Miftah, M. Z. (2022). Students’ Perception of the Use of Grammarly in Undergraduate Thesis Writing. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 5(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i2.p366-371

Fitria, T. N. (2021). “Grammarly” As a Teachers’ Alternative in Evaluating Non -Efl Students Writings. LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v6i2.3957

Lailika, H. I. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Grammarly As an Online Grammar Checker in Thesis Writing. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Nova, M. (2018). Utilizing Grammarly in Evaluating Academic Writing: a Narrative Research on Efl Students’ Experience. Premise: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v7i1.1332

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Perdana, I., Manullang, S. O., & Masri, F. A. (2021). Effectiveness of online Grammarly application in improving academic writing: review of experts experience. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1444

Pratama, Y. D. (2020). The Investigation of Using Grammarly As Online Grammar Checker in the Process of Writing. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 46–54.

Qassemzadeh, A., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The Impact of Feedback Provision by Grammarly Software and Teachers on Learning Passive Structures by Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(9), 1884. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0609.23

Rakai Yasmin, F., Rahayu, P., & Muifatun Nazilah, B. (2021). From Efl Learners’ Perspective: Does Grammarly As Online-Proofreader Help Them With Their Academic Writing? 1(October), 235–250. http://e-conf.usd.ac.id/index.php/ucpbi/UC

Setyowati, L. (2016). Analyzing The Students ’ Ability in Writing Opinion Essay using Flash Fiction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v1i1.1

Tudor, J., & Penlington, R. (2010). Perceptions and Their Influences on Approaches to Learning. Engineering Education, 0052. https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2010.05020069

Ummah, L. K., & Bisriyah, M. (2022). EFL students’ perception of Grammarly’s feedback and how they deal with the inaccuracy. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i2.1687

Yurika, F., Farahdiba, S., & Munir. (2023). Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of Grammarly As a Grammar Checker in the Process of Writing. Journal of Technology in Language Pedagogy (JTechLP), 2(2), 307–319.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31
Abstract views: 2 , PDF Downloads: 0