Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning: “Give One Get One” in Procedure Text Reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v5n2.p168-177Keywords:
Reading Comprehension, Procedure Text, Give One Get One StrategyAbstract
Reading comprehension is a fundamental skill for academic success, yet many students struggle with understanding complex texts, particularly procedural texts, which require sequential comprehension. This study investigates the effectiveness of the Give One Get One (GOGO) strategy in improving students’ reading comprehension of procedure texts. The study employs a quantitative research method using a one-group pre-test and post-test design to measure students’ progress. A total of 32 senior high school students participated in the study. Students underwent three treatment sessions, with their reading comprehension assessed before and after the intervention. The findings indicate that while there was a statistically significant difference in students’ reading comprehension scores, the effect size was very weak. Post-test results showed that some students’ scores declined, suggesting that the GOGO strategy may not be effective for teaching procedural texts. The structured nature of procedure texts may have limited the interactive benefits of the strategy, leading to inconsistent improvements in student performance. These results highlight the need for educators to carefully select instructional strategies based on text type and learning objectives. While GOGO may be effective for certain text genres, it may require modification or supplementation when applied to structured texts like procedural writing. Further research should explore alternative strategies that enhance engagement while maintaining comprehension accuracy.
Downloads
References
Anderson, M. (2003). Text Type in English. Macmillan Australia PTY-LTD.
Audina, Y., Zega, N., Simarmata, A., Situmeang, K. V., & Tarigan, S. N. (2020). An Analysis of Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v11i1.3689
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Welcome to Research in Education. www.ablongman.com/researchnavigator.com
Blass, L., & Whalley, E. (2006). Reading for a Reason: Expanding Reading Skills Series. Reading, 10(2).
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. CA Sage. Dalman. (2014). Keterampilan Membaca Nyaring. INA-Rxiv, 2(1).
Dressen-Hammouda, D., & Wigham, C. R. (2022). Evaluating multimodal literacy: Academic and professional interactions around student-produced instructional video tutorials. System, 105, 102727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102727
Endeshaw, A. D. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ EFL reading comprehension: Meshentie grade nine high school students in focus. Education Journal, 4(5), 222-231.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill and the strategies for improvement. International journal of English linguistics, 6(5), 180-187.
Guillaume, A. (2007). 50 Strategies for Active Teaching: Engaging K-12 Learners in the Classroom. Pearson Education, Inc.
Harahap, N. Y. (2018). The Effect of Picture Sequences Strategy On Students’ Writing Procedure Text Ability (A Study at the Eleventh Grade Students’ of MAN Sipagimbar in 2017/2018 Academic Year). Jurnal Liner (Language Intelligence And Educational Research), 1(2), 126–145.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson longman.
Isjoni. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Alfabeta.
Judy, C. (1997). Effective Teaching Strategies and Tools, Strategies and Tools. Clayton County Public School.
Kartini, R. D. (2017). Teaching and Learning Reading Through Give One Get One Strategy at The First Semester of The Eighth Grade of SMPN 02 Penawartama Tulang Bawang in The Academic Year of 2017/2018 [Doctoral dissertation]. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. What Works for Special-Needs Learners. Guilford Publications.
Laoli, A., & Zebua, E. P. (2022). Increasing The Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension by Using Give One Get One Strategy at The Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Mandrehe 2020/2021. TEHUDE: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 1-8.
Marpaung, S. N. (2019). The Effect of Using Give One Get One Strategy Towards Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMP Swasta Methodist 7 Medan.
Marzban, A., & Alinejad, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3744-3748.
Mendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbudristek Nomor 008/ H/ KR/ 2022. Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan teknologi tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wpcontent/unduhan/CP_2022.pdf
Nasri, M., & Biria, R. (2017). Integrating multiple and focused strategies for improving reading comprehension and l2 lexical development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 311-321.
Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., Kleemans, T., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). How executive functions contribute to reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12355
Nuttal, C. (1998). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Macmillan Heinemann ELT Journal, 1–43.
Pan, C. Y., & Wu, H. Y. (2013). The cooperative learning effects on English reading comprehension and learning motivation of EFL freshmen. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 13-27.
Pardiyono. (2006). 12 Writing clues for Better Writing Competence. Andi.
Preszler, J. (2005). Strategies to Help Struggling Readers Grade 4-12. South Dakota Department of Education.
Prihatna, R. Y. (2015). An analysis on generic structure and language features of procedure texts made by second year students of SMA Semen Gresik. RETAIN: Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 3(2).
Ristati, R., Bahing, B., Sujiyani, E., Susanty, S., Norahmi, M., Nugraha, R. F., & Amalia, N. Thematic analysis on novice learner’s procedural writing challenges: Insights, influences, and implications. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 6(2), 145-163.
Siahaan, S., & Shinoda, K. (2008). Generic text structure. Graha Ilmu.
Siregar, E. R., & Harahap, D. A. (2023). The Effect of Give One Get One Strategy on Students’ Reading Comprehension at Grade X SMA Negeri 5 Tanjungbalai in 2022/2023 Academic Year. Journal of English Education and Linguistics: JEELi, 1(2), 124–133.
Yusmalinda, A., & Astuti, P. (2020). English teachers’ methods in teaching reading comprehension of procedure text. In ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 75-84).
Zwiers, J. (2018). Building Reading Comprehension Habits In Grades 6-12. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0
