Peran Self Monitoring sebagai Mediator antara Job Characteristics dan Well-Being pada Guru Sekolah Inklusi

Authors

  • Ulifa Rahma Department of Psychology Brawijaya University, Malang
  • Zahratul Fauza Department of Psychology Brawijaya University, Malang
  • Faizah Faizah Department of Psychology Brawijaya University, Malang
  • Yuliezar Perwira Dara Department of Psychology Brawijaya University, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n2.p100-115

Keywords:

Job characterstics, self monitoring, well-being, guru, sekolah inklusi

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of teacher self-monitoring as a mediator between job characteristics (emotional job demands and trust in colleagues) and teacher well-being teachers in inclusive schools. The sample of this study was 204 teachers in Indonesia from elementary to high school levels in inclusive schools using G*power. The sample selection technique in this study was accidental sampling teachers in Indonesia from elementary to high school levels in inclusive schools. The research method used is correlational quantitative research. This study uses four measuring instruments, namely the teacher well being scale, the self-monitoring scale, and, to measure job characteristics, the omnibus trust and the emotional job demand scales. Analysis of research data refers to Baron & Kenny using process modeling analysis version 3.0 by Andrew Hayes. As a result, self monitoring is able to become a mediator between emotional job demand and teacher well-being. Self monitoring has also proven to be a mediator between trust in colleagues and teacher well-being.

Keywords: Job characterstics, self monitoring, well-being, teacher, inclusive school

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peran teacher self monitoring sebagai mediator antara job characteristic (emotional job demands dan trust in colleagues) dan teacher well-being guru disekolah inklusi. Sampel dalam penelitian 204 guru dari jenjang Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar sampai dengan Sekolah Menengah Atas di sekolah inklusi menggunakan aplikasi G*power. Teknik pemilihan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah accidental sampling yaitu seluruh guru inkusi yang ditemui dari jenjang Sekolah Dasar sampai Menengah Atas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif korelasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan empat alat ukur, yaitu skala teacher well being, self monitoring dan, untuk mengukur job characteristics, skala omnibus trust dan emotional job demand. Analisis data penelitian mengacu pada Baron & Kenny menggunakan analisis process modeling versi 3.0 oleh Andrew Hayes. Hasilnya self monitoring mampu menjadi mediator antara emotional job demand dan teacher well-being. Self monitoring juga terbukti mampu menjadi mediator antara trust in colleagues dan teacher well-being.

Author Biography

Ulifa Rahma, Department of Psychology Brawijaya University, Malang

Psycholgy brawijaya university

References

Aelterman, A., Engels, N., Van Petegem, K., & Pierre Verhaeghe, J. (2007). The wellbeing of teachers in flanders: the importance of a supportive school culture. Educational Studies, 33(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690701423085

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology: understanding human interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2002). Testing a conservation of resources model of the dynamics of emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(1), 5767. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.7.1.57

Brunsting, N. C., Sreckovic, M. A., & Lane, K. L. (2014). Special education teacher burnout: A Synthesis of Research from 1979 to 2013. Education & Treatment of Children, 37(4), 681712. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0032

Day, D. V., Schleicher, D. J., Unckless, A. L., & Hiller, N. J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.390

De Jonge, J., Dormann, C., Janssen, P. P., Dollard, M. F., Landeweerd, J. A., & Nijhuis, F. J. (2001). Testing reciprocal relationships between job characteristics and psychological wellbeing: A crosslagged structural equation model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167217

Erkutlu, H. (2012). Impact of psychological hardiness and self-monitoring on teacher burnout. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(43), 186-197. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/abstracts/43/pdf/HAKAN%20ER KUTLU.pdf

Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2010.540850

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10 (2), 486-489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001

Huang, S., Yin, H., & Lv, L. (2019). Job characteristics and teacher well-being: the mediation of teacher self-monitoring and teacher self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1543855

Kalis, T. M., Vannest, K. J., & Parker, R. (2007). Praise counts: Using self-monitoring to increase effective teaching practices. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 51(3), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20-27

Kilduff M., Mehra A., (Denny) Gioia D.A., Borgatti S. (2017) Brokering Trust to Enhance Leadership: A Self-Monitoring Approach to Leadership Emergence. In: Glückler J., Lazega E., Hammer I. (eds). Knowledge and Space, 11, 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45023-0_11

Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.006

McCallum, F., Price, D., Graham, A. & Morrison, A. (2017). Teacher wellbeing: a review of the literature. Australia: The University of Adelaide
Peng K. Z., Wong C. S., & Che H. S. (2010). The missing link between emotional demands and exhaustion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 777798. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011075300

Rahmawati, U. N., Nashori, F., Rachmahana, R. S. (2020). Pelatihan mindfulness teaching untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(1):49-60. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v7i1.8241

Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A Critical Review of the Job Demands-Resources Model¯: Implications for Improving Work and Health. Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach, 4367. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3

Shabir, U. M. (2015). Kedudukan guru sebagai pendidik. Journal UIN Alauddin, 2(2), 221-232. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/auladuna/article/view/878

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Burnout: A Study of Relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26: 1059-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001

Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 30(4), 526-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of educational research, 70(4), 547-593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547

Van Houtte, M. (2006). Tracking and Teacher Satisfaction: Role of Study Culture and Trust. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 247256. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.4.247-256

Van Houtte, M. & Van Maele, D. (2011), œThe black box revelation: In search for conceptual clarity regarding climate and culture in school effectiveness research, Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 505-524. Retrieved February 28, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23047912

Wulan, D.K. & Apriliani, A. C. (2017). Job Demands Dan Burnout Pada Guru Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB) Negeri. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 6(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.061.03

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121

Yin, H. (2015). The effect of teachers emotional labour on teaching satisfaction: Moderation of emotional intelligence. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 789-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995482

Yin, H., Huang, S., & Wang, W. (2016). Work environment characteristics and teacher well-being: The mediation of emotion regulation strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090907

Yin, H. B., Lee, J. C., & Jin, Y. L. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust: An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35-47. http://ejournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=4074

Yin, H., Huang, S., & Lv, L. (2018). A Multilevel Analysis of Job Characteristics, Emotion Regulation and Teacher Well-Being: A Job Demands-Resources Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02395

Zaki, S. (2018). Enhancing teacher effectiveness through psychological well-being: a key to improve quality of teachers. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 8(7), 286-295. Retrieved from https://www.ijmra.us/project%20doc/2018/IJRSS_JULY2018/IJMRA-14042.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-03-05

How to Cite

Rahma, U., Fauza, Z., Faizah, F., & Dara, Y. P. (2021). Peran Self Monitoring sebagai Mediator antara Job Characteristics dan Well-Being pada Guru Sekolah Inklusi. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 11(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n2.p100-115

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 543 , PDF Downloads: 376 , PDF Downloads: 0

Most read articles by the same author(s)