Visibility Paradox in Digital Representation of Traditional Foi Doa Music Paradoks Visibilitas dalam Representasi Digital Musik Tradisional Foi Doa
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital visibility in the Foi Doa instrument shows a shift in the way culture is understood in the digital space. Visual representation in digital media plays a strong role in directing the audience's perception of traditional practices. The Qualitative Digital Discourse Analysis (QDDA) method was used to analyze content and responses on two YouTube channels with different production styles. Observations are focused on comparisons between cinematic representations and everyday documentation. High audience engagement on cinematic videos does not develop into a deep musical understanding. The audience's response focuses more on the visual aspect than on the sound structure and spiritual function of the instrument. Simple documentation does not show a comparable level of interaction. These findings show the dominance of visual elements in shaping audience perception in the digital space. This condition is understood as the paradox of visibility, which is a situation when the expansion of reach through digitalization goes hand in hand with the simplification of meaning. In contrast to the concepts of mediatization and spectacularization that emphasize the changing form and dominance of media, the visibility paradox highlights specifically the tension between increased visibility and narrowing of the depth of meaning in digital consumption practices. Thus, digital representation not only expands access, but also limits the way culture is interpreted.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
kepemilikan artikel milik AutorReferences
Agung Nono, G., Reo, A., Evaristus, E., Haban, Y., Bhoki, I. N., & Alos, M. A. A. (2026). The meaning of the musical instrument Foi Doa in liturgical music. Journal of Educational Image (JCP, 6(1), 14–23.
Bagaskara, A., Sinaga, F. S. S., Audhyati, A., & Maulana, A. (2024). Anthropology of music: A review of history, theory, and development. Musicolastika: Journal of Performance & Music Education, 6(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.24036/musikolastika.v6i2.194.
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Review of Communication, 18(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881
Häikiö, T. K. (2022). Challenges and changes in arts education in Sweden—Visual communication, visual culture and visual competence in the syllabus for visual arts. Journal of Visual Literacy, 41(3–4), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2022.2132621.
Hein, A., & Foster, C. J. (Eds.). (2022). Understanding authenticity in Chinese cultural heritage. Routledge.
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the influence of the media on culture and society. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.
Hou, Y., Kenderdine, S., Picca, D., Egloff, M., & Adamou, A. (2022). Digitizing intangible cultural heritage embodied: State of the art. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494837.
KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582–596).
Kumar, S. (2024). Music and technology. Sangeet Galaxy e-Journal, 13(1), 200–206.
Larasati, Y. G., Fernando, H., Abdullah, I., Harpawati, T., & Morin, L. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of 20 years of traditional music research trends in Asia: 2004-2024. Resital: Journal of Performing Arts, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.24821/resital.v25i3.14983.
Pizzolitto, E. (2023). Music in business and management studies: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00.
Samarasinghe, K. (2024). A review of the international music conference themed “Symbiosis of Arts and Cultures: Nurturing Expression, Connection, and Well-being.” Journal of Research in Music (JRM, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4038/jrm.v2i1.26.
Santoso, I. B., Pujiono, B., & Darno, D. (2026). Digital disruption and Karawitan recordings: Paradigm shifts, aesthetic challenges, and opportunities for cultural preservation. Language and Arts: Journal of Language, Literature, Art, and Its Teaching, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/2550-0635.1376.
Sinulingga, R. A., Zein, T. T., & Purba, M. (2024). Kulcapi innovation and digitalization as a cultural diplomacy. In the 3rd ISOLLEAC. University of North Sumatra.
Tunnikmah, N., Irawanto, B., & Hujatnika, A. (2024). A critical literature review of mediatization of art on Instagram. IIJCAS, 11(2), 95–108. https://journal.isi.ac.id/index.php/IJCAS/article/view/11323/3993.
Väliverronen, E. (2021). Mediatisation of science and the rise of promotional culture. In D. M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242-8.
Wea, K., Due, A. P., Wege, K. L., Beda, S., Lantong, K. A., & Masus, R. O. (2024). Preservation of traditional music of Foi Doa for the Wogo people. Journal of Education Image (JCP, 5(1), 40–47.