ANALYSIS OF THE KHON DANCE AND SONGKRAN FESTIVAL CONFLICT BETWEEN THAILAND AND CAMBODIA ON THE REGISTRATION OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE AT UNESCO ANALISIS KONFLIK TARI KHON DAN FESTIVAL SONGKRAN ANTARA THAILAND DAN KAMBOJA PADA PENDAFTARAN WARISAN BUDAYA TAKBENDA DI UNESCO
Main Article Content
Abstract
his article aims to examine the cultural conflict and diplomacy that occurred between Thailand and Cambodia regarding the designation of the Khon dance and the Songkran festival as UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. Although several studies have discussed cultural heritage disputes in Southeast Asia, there is still limited research specifically examining how UNESCO recognition strengthens cultural nationalism between Thailand and Cambodia. This study aims to analyze how this recognition shapes national identity, political narratives, and bilateral relations between the two countries. This study uses a qualitative approach through document analysis and media discourse analysis using triangulation techniques. Data are drawn and collected from official UNESCO documents, government statements, and media coverage in both countries to understand the historical context and contemporary dynamics that have occurred. The findings indicate that UNESCO recognition can strengthen nationalist narratives and also trigger digital conflicts through the media and public sphere. However, on the other hand, this recognition also opens opportunities for cultural diplomacy and regional cooperation. Claims to cultural heritage are strategically mobilized by state and non-state actors to strengthen national identity and cultural legitimacy. This study emphasizes that intangible cultural heritage plays a dual role as a source of conflict and a means of cooperation, thus requiring a collaborative and inclusive approach in its management in the Southeast Asian region.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
kepemilikan artikel milik AutorReferences
Agarwal, R. (2009). Water Festivals of Thailand: The Indian Connection. Silpakorn University International Journal, 9(10), 7–18.
Anderson, B. (2020). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. In The new social theory reader (pp. 282-288). Routledge.
Bandyopadhyay, N. (2018). Indo-Thai Vai Vai-A Soft Song from West. Journal of the Centre for Heritage Studies, 49.
Damrhung, P., & Lowell Skar. (2023). Glossary of Terms Relevant to Dance in Thailand. In In Lives in Motion (pp. 225–236). Routledge India.
Eichler, J. (2021). Intangible cultural heritage, inequalities and participation: who decides on heritage? International Journal of Human Rights, 25(5), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1822821
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717–732. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
Hafstein, V. T. (2004). The politics of origins: Collective creation revisited. Journal of American Folklore, 117(465), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.2004.0073
Kamm, H. (1998). Cambodia: Report from a stricken land. Arcade Publishing.
Noyes, D. (2016). The Judgment of Solomon: Global Protections for Tradition and the Problem of Community Ownership. Humble Theory. https://doi.org/10.2979/humbletheory.0.0.14
Raj, D. (2022). Linkages: A brief description of the kingdoms of the Malay Archipelago and the kingdoms of Southeast Asia. Gerakbudaya Enterprise.
Rittibul, P. (2022). Ramayana’s royal thesis to form of Khon performance: A case study of Khon Scene Ramayana story: Ronnapak Asurin Indrajit. Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, 22(2), 256708. https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2022.256708
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x