Tingkat Persaingan pada Industri Tembakau dan Dampaknya terhadap Petani Tembakau  (Studi Kasus Industri Tembakau Madura)

Bondan Satriawan

doi:10.26740/bisma.v3n1.p101-111

Authors

Bondan Satriawan Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v3n1.p101-111

Keywords:

Competition, Structure, Conduct, Performance and Tobacco

Abstract

This study tries to explore the degree of competition in tobacco Industry in Madura. By doing so, this study examines the competition in all markets of the distributional levels of Maduras tobacco, from farmer to tobaccos final user. In addition, for every market of the distributional level, the discussion is focused on the competition among the sellers themselves, the buyers themselves and also the consequences for the sellers and the buyers in terms of price, strategic behavior and profit. Linear œStructure-Conduct-Performance (S-C-P) model is being used as the main framework in this study. Additionally, this study uses primary and secondary data. Furthermore, this study shows that in the upstream industry of tobacco, the degree of competition is almost perfect, and as it gets closer to the downstream industry of tobacco the degree of competition is close to monopoly. Hence, the closer a firm to the upstream industry of tobacco, the profit is less, and as it gets closer to the downstream industry of tobacco, the profit is much higher, as well as its monopoly or market power. In turn, this condition is negatively impacting the tobacco farmer welfare as the upstream firm.

References

------------ 2002, Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Sumenep No. 06 Tahun 2002 tentang œTata Laksana dan Retribusi Izin Pembelian dan Pengusahaan Tembakau Madura.
------------ 2006, Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Pamekasan No. 06 Tahun 2008 tentang œIzin Pembelian Tembakau dan Izin Pengusahaan Gudang Tembakau.
Astro, Masuki M. 2008. œPerlawanan dengan Akal-akalan Petani Tembakau Madura. www.antara.co.id
Bain, J 1956, Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Bishop, M, Kay, J and Mayer, C 1994, Privatization and Economic Performance,
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Biro Pusat Statistik, 2009, Propinsi Jawa Timur dalam Angka 2009
Church, J and Ware, R 2000, Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach, McGraw-Hill International Edition, Singapore.
Kumar, Krishna. 1993. Rapid Appraisal Methods. 1993. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433.
Mubyarto. 1984. Pengantar Ekonomi Petanian. LP3ES. Yogyakarta.
OECD (2004), ˜Regulatory Performance: Ex Post Evaluation of Regulatory Tools and Institutions, Working Party on Regulatory Management and Reform, DraftReport by the Secretariat, Paris: OECD.
Operations Evaluation Department, The World Bank. 2004. Monitoring and Evaluation: Some Tools, Methods, and Approaches. The World Bank. Washington, D.C. www.worldbank.org/oed/ecd/
Stoft, S 2002, Power System Economics: Designing Market for Electricity, IEEE Press.
Stout, Jim, Susan Leetmaa, and Mary Anne Normile. 2008. Evaluating EU Agricultural Policy Reform Using the EU WTO Model. Economic Research Service, USDA 1800 M Street NW #5065 Washington, DC 20036-5831.
Todaro, Michael P. Economic Development. Seventh Edition, New York University. Addison Wesley.
Widiyanto, Akhmad. 2009. œEfek Domino Tembakau. www.pamekasan.go.id.