The impact of sustainable supplier selection to supplier performance in mining industry: ethical culture as moderating variable

Authors

  • Nasar Buntu Laulita Universitas Internasional Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v14n1.p63-73

Keywords:

ethical culture, mining, structural equation model, supplier performance, sustainable supplier selection

Abstract

Sustainable supplier selection during tender is one of the critical factors in the supply chain management to maintain sustainable procurement in an organisation. Many factors contribute to the success of sustainable supplier selection practices, and ethical culture is one of the factors because it would influence supplier selection. This study aims to determine the effect of implementing sustainable supplier selection on supplier performance by moderating the effect of ethical culture in the mining industry. This type of research is explanatory research with hypothesis testing of 104 respondents by distributing questionnaires. The data analysis is conducted by Structural Equation Model (SEM). The research shows that the construct of sustainable supplier selection with economic, social, and environmental aspects as dimensions has a direct and significant impact on supplier performance in the mining industry. This research also shows that ethical culture has a significant moderating effect in the relationship between sustainable supplier selection and supplier performance. The managerial implication of this research is providing guideline for decision-makers to implement sustainable supplier selection by considering economic, social, and environmental aspects while maintaining an ethical culture as a part of work professionalism to maintain sustainable performance in the mining industry.

References

Abdullahi, B., Ibrahim, Y. M., Ibrahim, A. D., & Bala, K. (2019). Development of web-based e-Tendering system for Nigerian public procuring entities. International Journal of Construction Management, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1620492

Ahmad, M. T., & Mondal, S. (2018). Dynamic supplier selection approach for mining equipment company. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-04-2018-0046.

Ahmadi, H. B., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 126(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020.

Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12(6), 1668–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023.

Bai, C., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Ahmadi, H. B., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: A group decision-support approach. International Journal of Production Research, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1574042.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Phychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

Bidarti, A., Darwanto, D. H., Hartono, S., & Jamhari. (2019). Supplier Structure and Performance Evaluation of Supplier Network Phase Rice Supply Chain Management in South Sumatra. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Develpoment Research, 5(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.5171.

Cadden, T., Marshall, D., & Cao, G. (2013). Opposites attract: Organisational culture and supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541311293203.

De Felice, F., Deldoost, M. H., Faizollahi, M., & Petrillo, A. (2015). Performance Measurement Model for the Supplier Selection Based on AHP. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7(17), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5772/61702.

Goebel, P., Reuter, C., Pibernik, R., & Sichtmann, C. (2012). The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.020.

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Boston: Cengage.

Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A., & Hassan, S. Z. (2016). Supply chain strategy and the role of suppliers: Evidence from the Indian sub-continent. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7), 1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2014-0058.

Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New Statistical Features. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Kuo, R. J., Pai, C. M., Lin, R. H., & Chu, H. C. (2015). The integration of association rule mining and artificial immune network for supplier selection and order quantity allocation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 250(2015), 958–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.11.015.

Landry, D. J. (2016). The case of certification of the innovation professional. International Journal of Innovation Science, 8(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-03-2016-002.

Lo, H., Liaw, C., Gul, M., & Lin, K. (2021). Sustainable supplier evaluation and transportation planning in multi-level supply chain networks using multi-attribute- and multi-objective decision making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107756.

Lundberg, S., & Bergman, M. A. (2017). Tendering design when price and quality is uncertain. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-04-2016-0063.

Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195(1), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025.

Ortiz‑Barrios, M., Cabarcas‑Reyes, J., Ishizaka, A., Barbati, M., Jaramillo‑Rueda, N., & de Jesús Carrascal‑Zambrano, G. (2020). A hybrid fuzzy multi‑criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift flters: A case study from the mining industry. Annals of Operations Research, 1(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03737-y.

Ping, R. A. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224379503200308.

Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C. (2011). The relationship between multidimensional organizational culture and performance. International Journal Operational Production Management, 31(7), 712–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111144823.

Rahman, I. M. A., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2018). The Moderating Effect of Culture on the Relationship between Women Directors and CSR Disclosure in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9(1), 133–141. https://dx.doi.org/10.17576/AJAG-2018-09-12.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Shi, W., & Veenstra, K. (2020). The Moderating Efect of Cultural Values on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04555-9.

Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2016). Managing supply chain uncertainty with emerging ethical issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(10), 1272–1307. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2014-0599.

Thumbi, N. P., Hannah, B., & Rosemarie, W. (2020). Moderating Effect of Organizational Culture on the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Employees’ Performance in Classified Hospitality Firms in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(12), 51–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n12p51.

Torelli, R. (2020). Sustainability, responsibility and ethics: Different concepts for a single path. Social Responsibility Journal, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2020-0081.

UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERTAMBANGAN DAN BATU BARA (2009. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Retrieved from https://eiti.ekon.go.id/v2/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/UU-4-TAHUN-2009.pdf.

Wesarat, P., Sharif, M. Y., & Abdul Majid, A. H. (2017). Role of Organizational Ethics in Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal Sustainable Future for Human Security, 5(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.24910/jsustain/5.1/6776.

Wouters, O. J., Sandberg, D. M., Pillay, A., & Kanavos, P. G. (2019). The impact of pharmaceutical tendering on prices and market concentration in South Africa over a 14-year period. Social Science & Medicine, 220(1), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.029.

Yang, F., & Zhang, X. (2017). The impact of sustainable supplier management practices on buyer-supplier performance: An empirical study in china. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(1), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-08-2016-0043.

Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zolfani, S. H. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 3728–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095.

Yesil, S., & Kaya, A. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on firm financial performance: Evidence from a developing country. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81(1), 428–437. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.455.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Laulita, N. B. (2021). The impact of sustainable supplier selection to supplier performance in mining industry: ethical culture as moderating variable. BISMA (Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 14(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v14n1.p63-73

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 497 , PDF Downloads: 549