Pengaruh Kelebihan Informasi Inkonsisten Terhadap Ketidakpedulian dengan Pembenaran Sistem Sebagai Kovariabel
The Effect of Inconsistent Information Overload on Ignorance with the System Justification as a Covariable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v12n1.p92-102Keywords:
Kelebihan informasi, inkonsistensi, ketidakpedulian, pembenaran sistemAbstract
With the rising of digital innovation, the phenomenon of overload and inconsistent information has reached an alarming point. The inconsistent information overload will cause individual’s cognitive and psychological discomfort. Therefore, individuals tend to develop coping mechanisms such as ignoring the overload information deliberately and rely on the prevailing social norm. This study assessed the effect of the inconsistent and overloaded economic information on students' ignorance with the justification system as a covariable. A between-subjects experimental design was used with one control group and two treatment groups. The participants are 90 undergraduate students majoring in non-economics studies in Yogyakarta. The results of ancova showed that the inconsistent and overload information either at high or low-intensity levels, with system justification as a covariable, did not affect students' ignorance. Further, anova was employed to distinguish the mean between groups, and there are no significant differences between low and high-intensity information overload. Further research needs to involve more internal and external factors that influence ignorance.
Keywords: information overload, inconsistency, ignorance, system justification
Abstrak: Maraknya inovasi digital membuat fenomena informasi yang berlebihan dan tidak konsisten telah mencapai titik yang mengkhawatirkan. Informasi yang berlebihan dan tidak konsisten akan menyebabkan ketidaknyamanan psikologis pada individu. Karena itu, individu cenderung mengembangkan mekanisme koping seperti mengabaikan informasi yang berlebihan dan mengandalkan norma sosial yang berlaku. Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh ketidakonsistenan dan kelebihan informasi ekonomi terhadap ketidakpedulian mahasiswa dengan sistem justifikasi sebagai kovariabel. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain eksperimen between subject design dengan satu kelompok kontrol dan dua kelompok perlakuan. Partisipan adalah 90 mahasiswa S1 berasal dari jurusan non ekonomi yang kuliah di Yogyakarta. Hasil analisis ANAKOVA menunjukkan bahwa informasi yang tidak konsisten dan berlebihan baik pada tingkat intensitas tinggi maupun rendah, dengan justifikasi sistem sebagai kovariabel, tidak mempengaruhi ketidaktahuan siswa. Selanjutnya, analisis anova digunakan untuk membedakan rata-rata antara kelompok, dan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelebihan informasi intensitas rendah dan tinggi. Penelitian selanjutnya perlu lebih banyak melibatkan faktor internal dan eksternal yang mempengaruhi ketidakpedulian.
References
Arfini, S., & Magnani, L. (2020). Introduction: Knowing the unknown. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02690-4
Azwar, S. (2015). Asumsi-Asumsi dalam inferensi statistika. Buletin Psikologi, 9(1), Article 1. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/buletinpsikologi/article/view/7436
Carballo, A. D. (2016). Need for Cognition, Ambiguity Tolerance and Likelihood of Prejudice. https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/6435
Castells, M. (2011). The Rise of the Network Society. John Wiley & Sons.
Dhani, K. R. (2016). Menciptakan ketidakpedulian: Efek kelebihan informasi-inkonsisten terhadap ketidakpedulian. (Master Theses) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/107702
Guo, Y., Lu, Z., Kuang, H., & Wang, C. (2020). Information avoidance behavior on social network sites: Information irrelevance, overload, and the moderating role of time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102067
Heinelt, H. (2019). Challenges to Political Decision-making: Dealing with Information Overload, Ignorance and Contested Knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398001
Hertwig, R., & Engel, C. (2021). Deliberate Ignorance: Choosing Not to Know. MIT Press.
Knustad, M., & Johansson, C. (2021). Anonymity and Inhibition in Newspaper Comments. Information, 12(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12030106
Park, C. S. (2019). Does Too Much News on Social Media Discourage News Seeking? Mediating Role of News Efficacy Between Perceived News Overload and News Avoidance on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119872956. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872956
Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (2008). Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford University Press Stanford, California. https://philarchive.org/rec/PROATM
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

