DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE LEARNING MATERIAL WITH SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES (SSI) ON CLIMATE CHANGE MATERIALS TO IMPROVE  SCIENCE LITERACY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Yaumi Yaumi; Madlazim madlazim; Titik Taufikurohmah

doi:10.26740/jppipa.v4n2.p56-63

Authors

Yaumi Yaumi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Madlazim madlazim Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Titik Taufikurohmah Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v4n2.p56-63

Keywords:

Socio-Scientific Issues, scientific literacy, respons

Abstract

This research aims to produce IPA learning devices with the approach of Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) on climate change materials to improve the science literacy of Junior high school students. The learning devices developed are syllabus, learning Implementation Plan, Student teaching materials, Student Worksheets, and Science literacy test. This type of research is development research with the model Dick and Carey. Test learning devices in the classroom using one group pre-Test post-Test design. The research instruments in this study are validation sheets, learning implementation observation sheets, activity observation sheets, test sheets, and student response polls. Data collection using validation methods, observations, tests, and polls. Data analysis techniques use quantitative descriptions. The results of the study show that learning devices are declared worthy of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The validity aspect indicates that the learning device is very valid and reliable. The practicality aspect of the practice of learning has an average 3.66 with excellent criteria and an student activity is very active. The average achievement of science literacy from 32 students in class VII A when pre-test was at level 2 experienced an increase when post-test was at level 4. Based on N-Gain test the value of 0.50 is on medium criteria. Students ' response to the application of a Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) approach to climate change material is very good. Learners give a positive response of 87.60%.

References

Anangun, S. S. (2010). Teachers Candidates. Journal Procedia Social and Behavioral Science , 981-985.

Borich, G. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. USA: Macmilan Publishing Company.

Cahyo, A. N. (2013). Panduan Aplikasi Teori-Teori Belajar Mengajar Teraktual dan Terpopuler. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Daryanto. (2015). Media Pembelajaran Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction (Seventh Edition). New York : Person.

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change Gain Score. Journals of Physics Education Research , 66.

Hoolbrook, J. R. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education , 275-288.

Ibrahim, M. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Kardi, S. (2012). Pengantar Pengembangan Kurikulum dan RPP. Surabaya: PPS Unesa.

Inzanah. (2014). Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Tesis tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya : Unesa.

Kemendikbud. (2016a). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2016b).Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2016c). Panduan Pembelajaran untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2017a). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2017b).Panduan Penyusunan RPP Revisi 2017. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2017c).Buku Guru Kelas VII Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Reviasi. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2018). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lambert, J. B. (2017). Argumentation as a strategy for increasing preservice teachers understanding of climate change, a key global socioscientific issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematic, Science, and Technology , 101-112.

Kirana, Widya, H. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berpendekatan Socio-Scientific Issues Pada Materi Getaran, Gelombang, Dan Bunyi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMP.Thesis tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa.

Memis, Esra Kabatas; Cevik; Ebru Ezberci. (2017). Examination of Students Small Groups Discussion in Argumentation Proces:Scientific and Socio-Scientific. Online: (https:/files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148912.pdf).
Nuangchalerm, Pasart. (2010). Engaging Students to Perceive Nature of Science Through Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction. European Journal of Social Science.Vol(13). 1

OECD. (2016). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Result from PISA 2015- Indonesia. Diunduh dari ( HYPERLINK "https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf" https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf ) pada 20 Maret 2019.

Purwanti, Widhy, H. (2013). Model Integrated Science Berbasis Socio Scientific Issues Untuk Mengembangkan Thinking Skills Dalam Mewujudkan 21St Century Skills.Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains UNY. Vol (1). 2.

Putri, Pungky Dilaka. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA dengan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues(SSI)untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Materi Perubahan Iklim.Thesis tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa.

Rahayu, Sri. (2017). Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21.Online:(http://seminar.uny.ac.id.pdf) diakses 18 Agustus 2018.

Ridwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian Cetakan ke VII. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sadler, T.D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol 41(5), 513536.

Salim, N. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Shoimin, A. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Indeks.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2014). Cooperativ Learning Teori & Aplikasi PAIKEM. Surabaya: Pustaka Pelajar.

Thoharudin, U. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Van Joolingen, W. (1999). Cognitive Tools for Discovery Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intellegence in Education .Vol (10).385.
Zeidler, D. (2009). Advancing Reflective Judgment Through Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching .Vol (22).74.

Zeidler, D. (2005). Beyond STS: A. Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Edition. Journal Of Science Education .Vol (89).3.

Zeidler, D. L., & Bryan. (2009). Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education. Vol (21). 2.

Zobi, Abdallah Salim. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-Scientific Issues Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students Ability of Making Appropriate Decisions Towards These Issues. International Education Studies. Vol (7). 8.