TRAINING NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION STUDENTS AS A PRE-SERVICE TEACHER IN CONSTRUCTING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS OF COGNITIVE DOMAIN THROUGH CONSTRUCTIVIST CLASSROOM

Qurrotul Anfa

doi:10.26740/jppipa.v6n1.p1-6

Authors

Qurrotul Anfa STKIP Modern Ngawi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v6n1.p1-6

Keywords:

constructivist classroom, constructing assessment, cognitive domain

Abstract

This research aimed at training science education students as a pre-service teacher in constructing assessment instruments of cognitive domain through constructivist classroom. The modification of constructivist classroom in material of cognitive domain test assessment procedures was developed by researcher. The subject of this research were 22 college students semester V of natural science education students at STKIP Modern Ngawi. The research used pre-experimental design with one-shot case study design. The instruments used for analyzing the competences in constructing assessment instruments of cognitive domain was by students learning outcomes completeness sheet. The college students will be said to be complete their competences if they sufficient Criterion Referenced Evaluation specifically more than equal to 75%. Empirically, the result of this research according to the completeness of student learning outcomes as a whole was 85.50% or in a very valid category. It means that natural science education students can construct well assessment instruments of cognitive domain trough constructivist classroom.

Author Biography

Qurrotul Anfa, STKIP Modern Ngawi

Saya Qurrotul Anfa, dosen baru di STKIP Modern Ngawi sejak September 2020. Prefrensi bidang study saya adalah Pendidikan biologi dan Pendidikan IPA. Saya lulusan S1 Universitas Negeri Surabaya tahun 2016, dan S2 Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta tahun 2019. Keduanya saya mengambil jurusan Pendidikan Biologi. Saya telah menulis 3 artikel jurnal penelitian selama study S2. Satu jurnal saya melalui seminar internasional telah publish dan terindex Scopus. Terimakasih!

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.Azwar, Saifuddin. (2015). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Edisi ke-4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.Barman, Pranab & Bhattacharyya, D. Dibyendu. (2015). Effectiveness of Constructivist Teaching Method: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences And Humanities, 5(1), 69-76.BSNP. (2016). Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Dirjen Dikdasmen.Eggen, P and Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational Psychology: Classroom Connections 5th edition. New York: Macmillan.Gray, Audrey. (1997). Contructivist Teaching and Learning. SSTA Research Centre Report, 97-07.Hevria, Silvi. (2019). Constructivist Learning Model Using Portal Rumah Belajar for Primary School Student. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 372, 268-271.Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model Asesmen Autentik untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131-141.Linn, Robert L. and Norman E. Gronlund. (2000). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching Seventh Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Marlowe, Bruce A., & Page, Marilyn L. (2005). Creating and Sustaining the Constructivist Classroom First Edition. Michigan: SAGE Publication.Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 3340.Peraturan Pemerintah RI. (2015). Standart Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.Raida, S.A., & Jamaludin, D.N. (2020). The Effectiveness of Constructivist Learning Using Guided Discovery Models on The Concept of A Regulatory System for Curiosity and AntiNarcotics Attitudes. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 3(1), 41-50.Sabtiawan, W. B., Yuanita, L., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2019). Effectiveness of Authentic Assessment: Performances, Attitudes, and Prohibitive Factors. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 156-175.Salili F, Chiu CY, & Lai S. (2001). The influence of culture and context on Students: Motivational orientation and performance. In: Salili F, Chiu C, Hong Y, editors. Student motivation: The culture and context of learning. London: Plenum. pp. 221247.Widoyoko, Eko. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.