An Exploration of Scientific Literacy on Physics Subjects within Phenomenon-based Experiential Learning

Authors

  • Prima Warta Santhalia Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Lia Yuliati Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p%25p

Keywords:

scientific literacy, phenomenon based experiential learning, expansion

Abstract

Abstract

Scientific literacy is the ability to involve yourself in problems related to science. This research explores students' scientific literacy skills in experiential learning based on phenomena on the concept of expansion. This research was conducted with a mix-method approach with an embedded experimental model design. The data were collected through scientific literacy tests (r = 0.53), and open-ended questions interviews with the students, then analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test quantitatively, and using the Bybee (1997) assessment rubric qualitatively. Based on the results, it was found that the majority of students experienced an increase in their scientific literacy from the SI (Scientific Illiteracy) category (96.88%) into CSL (Conceptual Scientific Literacy) (46.88%). We concluded that phenomenon-based experiential learning was effective in improving students' scientific literacy. So, we need more effort to improve and increase students' scientific literacy skills by integrating scientific literacy competencies while implementing science learning in schools.

References

Moodley K and Gaigher E. Teaching Electric Circuits: Teachers’ Perceptions and Learners’ Misconceptions. Research in Science Eduaction. 2019; 49: 73–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5.

Park M. Seeing the Forest Through the Trees Using Network Analysis: Exploring Student Responses to Conceptual Physics Questions. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2020; 29: 605–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09840-w.

Yeo J, Lim E, Tan KCD, and Ong YS. The Efficacy of an Image-to-Writing Approach to Learning Abstract Scientific Concepts: Temperature and Heat. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2021; 19: 21-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10026-z.

Vidak A, Odžak S, and Mešić V. Teaching about Thermal Expansion: Investigating The Effectiveness of a Cognitive Bridging Approach. Research in Science and Technological Education. 2019; 37(3): 324–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1551200.

Irawati RK and Sofianto EWN. The Misconception Analysis of Natural Science Students on Heat and Temperature Material Using Four Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1321(3): 032104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032104.

Priyadi R, Diantoro M, Parno P, and Helmi H. An Exploration of Students’ Mental Models on Heat and Temperature: A Preliminary Study. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 2019; 9(2): 114-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p114-122.

Murdoch J. Our Preconceived Notions of Play Need to Challenging. Early Years Educator. 2018; 19(9): 22–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/eyed.2018.19.9.22.

Yuliati L, Parno, Yogismawati F, and Nisa IK. Building Scientific Literacy and Concept Achievement of Physics through Inquiry Based Learning for STEM Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1097: 012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012022.

Pahrudin A, Irwandan, Triyana E, Oktarisa Y, and Anwar C. The Analysis of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Scientific Literacy: Focus on the Competence and Knowledge Aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2019; 8(1): 52-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728.

Reddy D. Scientific Literacy, Public Engagement and Responsibility in Science. Cultures of Science. 2021: 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083211009646.

Howell EL and Brossard D. (Mis)informed About What? What It Means To Be a Science-Literate Citizen in a Digital World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2021: 118(15); e1912436117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117.

Budiarti IS and Tanta. Analysis on Students’ Scientific Literacy of Newton’s Law and Motion System in Living Things. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education). 2021; 9(1): 36-51. Available from: http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/18470.

Prasetyo D, Marianti A, and Alimah S. Improvement of Students’ Science Literacy Skills Using STEM-Based E-Modules. Journal of Innovative Science Education. 2021; 10(1): 216-221. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v9i3.43539.

Adnan A, Mulbar U, Sugiarti S, and Bahri A. Scientific Literacy Skills of Students: Problem of Biology Teaching in Junior High School in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal Instruction. 2021; 14(3): 847–860. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14349a.

Wenning CJ. Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Courses. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 2011; 6(2): 1-8. Available from: http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/~cjwennin/jpteo/.

Karim S, Prima EC, Utari S, Saepuzaman D, and Nugaha MG. Reconstructing the Physics Teaching Didactic based on Marzano’s Learning Dimension on Training the Scientific Literacies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017; 812: 012102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012102.

OECD. PISA 2015 Results in Focus. OECD Publishing; 2018.

Babaci-Wilhite Z. A Rights-Based Approach to Science Literacy Using Local Languages: Contextualising Inquiry-Based Learning in Africa. International Review of Education. 2017; 63: 381–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9644-3.

May S, Jang-Jones A, and McGregor A. PISA 2018: New Zealand Summary Report 2019.

Dewi CA, Khery Y, and Erna M. An Ethnoscience Study in Chemistry Learning to Develop Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2019; 8(2): 279-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19261.

Jufri AW, Setiadi D, and Sripatmi. Scientific Reasoning Ability of Prospective Student Teacher in The Excellence Program of Mathematics And Science Teacher Education In University of Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2016; 5(1): 69-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5792.

Treacy DJ and Kosinski-Collins MS. Using the Writing and Revising of Journal Articles to Increase Science Literacy and Understanding in a Large Introductory Bi-ology Laboratory Course. Atlas Journal of Science Education. 2011; 1(2): 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5147/ajse.v1i2.72.

Arifin L and Sunarti T. The Improvement of Students’ Scientific Literacy Through Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Fluid Dynamics Topic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 2017; 7(2): 68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v7n2.p68-78.

Mattila P and Silander P. How to Create the School of the Future–Revolutionary Thinking and Design from Finland. Oulu: Multprint; 2015.

Wakil K, Rahman R, Hasan D, Mahmood P, and Jalal T. Phenomenon-Based Learning for Teaching ICT Subject through other Subjects in Primary Schools. Journal of Computer and Education Research. 2019; 7(13): 205–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.553507.

Symeonidis V and Schwarz JF. Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning Through The Pedagogical Lenses of Phenomenology: The Recent Curriculum Reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe. 2016; 28: 31–47. Available from: http://www.edite.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Phenomenon-based-teaching-and-learning-through-the-pedagogical-lenses-of-phenomenology_The-recent-curriculum-reform-in-Finland.pdf.

McPadden D and Brewe E. Impact of the Second Semester University Modeling Instruction Course on Students’ Representation Choices. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2017; 13: 020129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020129.

Roberts J. From the Editor: The Possibilities and Limitations of Experiential Learning Research in Higher Education. Journal of Experiential Education 2018; 41: 3–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917751457.

Kolb AY and Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2015.

Yuliati L, Nisa’ F, and Mufti N. Acquisition of Projectile Motion Concepts on Phenomenon Based Physics’ Experiential Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1422: 012007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012007.

Kuh G, O’Donnell K, and Schneider CG. HIPs at Ten. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2017; 49(5): 8–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805.

Bybee RW. Achieving Scientific Literacy : from Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 1997.

Perkasa M and Aznam N. Pengembangan SSP kimia Berbasis Pendidikan Berkelanjutan untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Kimia dan Kesadaran Terhadap Lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. 2016; 2(1): 46-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.10269.

Nisrochah and Wilujeng I. Pengaruh Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Experiential Learning Model terhadap Scientific Literacy dan Problem Solving Skills Peserta Didik SMP. Master Thesis. Unpublished. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta; 2016.

Kang J. Interrelationship Between Inquiry-Based Learning and Instructional Quality in Predicting Science Literacy. Research in Science Education. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6.

Santhalia PW, Yuliati L, and Wisodo H. Building Students’ Problem-Solving Skill in the Concept of Temperature and Expansion Through Phenomenon-Based Experiential Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1422: 012021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012021.

Hayati MN. The Use Science Literacy Taxonomy to Measure Chemistry Literacy of The Science Teacher Candidates. Unnes Science Education Journal. 2017; 6(1): 1496-1502. Available from: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/article/view/13837.

Al-Momani FNN. Assessing the Development of Scientific Literacy among Undergraduates College of Education. Journal of Studies in Education. 2016; 6(2): 199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9405.

Mufarridah D. Reduksi Miskonsepsi Kinematika Siswa Melalui Model Kooperatif Strategi Konflik Kognitif Berbantuan Kit dan Phet. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains (JPPS). 2015; 4(2): 557-571. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v4n2.p557-571.

Mardhiyyah LA, Rusilowati A, and Linuwih S. Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Tema Energi. Journal of Primary Education. 2016; 5(2): 147-154. DOI: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/12905.

Novaristiana R, Rinanto Y, and Ramli M. Scientific Literacy Profile in Biological Science of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia. 2019; 5(1): 9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7080.

Murti PR, Aminah NS, and Harjana. The Analysis of High School Students’ Science Literacy Based on Nature of Science Literacy Test (NOSLiT). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1097: 012003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012003.

Nasution. Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2010.

Shofiyah N. Deskripsi Literasi Sains Awal Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA pada Konsep IPA. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. 2015; 4(2): 113-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v4i2.13.

Verlinda S, Sutopo S, and Latifah E. The Effectivenes of Modeling Instruction Learning on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Rotational Dynamic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 2020; 10(2): 158-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n2.p158-172.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-26

How to Cite

Santhalia, P. W. and Yuliati, L. (2021) “An Exploration of Scientific Literacy on Physics Subjects within Phenomenon-based Experiential Learning”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(1), pp. 72–82. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v11n1.p%p.

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract View: 316

Most read articles by the same author(s)