Implementation of the Independent Campus Learning Policy in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jcms.v9n1.p13-23Keywords:
Independence, Freedom to learn, Independent Campus, Quality educationAbstract
The research aims to describe the implementation of the MBKM policy. This is a phenomenological type of qualitative research, namely examining the problem as a phenomenon in depth and finding patterns of connection between phenomena. Data was collected with the help of interviews, observation, and documentation techniques. All data obtained were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that (1) FKIP Universitas Mataram, FISH Universitas Negeri Surabaya, and FT Universitas Negeri Makassar have implemented the MBKM policy, (2) the implementation of MBKM has had an impact on increasing students' self-confidence in obtaining additional competencies beyond core competencies according to the program study, (3) supporting factors in the form of the availability of BKP options for students, the challenge factor of limited supporting funds and BKP implementation tools, and (4) as an essential part of determining key performance indicators (IKU)of higher education institution, it is necessary to adjust the implementation of MBKM policy constantly.
References
Barnawi, & Darojat, J. (2017). Penelitian Fenomenologi Pendidikan: Teori dan praktik. (1st ed.). Ar-Ruzz Media.
Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (1st ed., Vol. 1). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Huang, Y., & Huang, G. (2020). Design and implementation of the web-based independent learning platform. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 750(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/750/1/012007
Knight, J. (2008). Higher Education in Turmoil: The changing world of internationalization. (13th ed.). Sense Publishers.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data Kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. (T. R. Rohadi & Mulyarto, Eds.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Mota, R., & Scott, D. (2014). Education for Innovation and Independent Learning (Vol. 1). Elsevier.
Sudirtha, I. G., Widiartini, N. K., & Anggendari, M. D. (2021). Development of 21stcentury skill learning designs through the application of the concept of independent learning in the vocational field. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012062
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Universitas Mataram. (2021). Rencana Strategis Universitas Mataram Tahun 2021-2025. Universitas Mataram.
Wesna, M., Wardono, & Masrukan. (2021). Mathematical literacy ability in terms of the independent learning students on reciprocal teaching learning models with approaching RME assisted by google classroom. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042040
Willis, J. W. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods in Education and Educational Technology: Research, innovation, and methods in Educational Technology. Information Age Publishing.
Yang, D., Swekwi, U., Dai, X., & Tu, C. C. (2022). Potential Implications of Optimism and Mental Health for the Independent Learning of Chinese University Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710602
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Civics and Moral Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 152
,
PDF Downloads: 90
