Dynamics of Language Attitudes and Language Choices In the Film Everything Everywhere All at Once: A Sociolinguistic Study on The Use of Mandarin, English, and Cantonese
Keywords:
Language Attitude, Language Choice, Sociolinguistics, Everything Everywhere All at Once, Code-switchingAbstract
This study examines the dynamics of language attitude and language choice in the Oscar-winning film Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) using a sociolinguistic approach. Representing the first and second generations of the Chinese-American immigrant community, the film presents linguistic complexities involving Mandarin, English, and Cantonese. The research method applied is descriptive qualitative with filmic discourse analysis techniques. Data consist of dialogue fragments, code-switching, code-mixing, and non-verbal expressions reflecting the characters' subjective evaluations of specific languages. The results show that language choices within the Wang family are determined by interlocutors, interaction domains, topics, and emotional load. Cantonese serves as an instrument of traditional domestic intimacy and respect toward the oldest generation (Gong Gong), Mandarin functions as a formal-emotional bridge for the nuclear family, while English dominates the expression of identity for the second generation (Joy), who experiences de-ethnicization. The identified language attitudes split into a positive (sentimental-loyal) attitude among the first generation, who view their native tongue as a cultural anchor, and a pragmatic-ambivalent attitude among the second generation. This intergenerational linguistic gap triggers communication distortions and cultural censorship to maintain the concept of 'face' (mianzi), yet emotional resolution is ultimately achieved through pluralistic linguistic compromises.
References
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Language and nationalism: Two integrative essays. Newbury House.
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.
Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614308-21
Ho, D. Y. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884. https://doi.org/10.1086/226145
Kwan, D., & Scheinert, D. (Directors). (2022). Everything everywhere all at once [Film]. A24.
Li, W. (Ed.). (2000). The bilingualism reader. Routledge.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford University Press.
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.
Wong Fillmore, L. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80059-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Chinese Interdisciplinary Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 2
,
PDF Downloads: 0









