Queer Linguistics: Exploring Pragmatic Strategy within Gay’s Language on Online Dating Apps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v5n1.p76-90Keywords:
meaning, queer, gay community, register, online dating appsAbstract
A play in meanings can be found within an internal interaction of a secretive and concealed community. In Surabaya, queer individuals, particularly gay men, employ secret codes within their language as a defensive measure against conservative societal norms. The primary strategy of this coded language involves the selection of specific vocabulary and the nuanced meanings embedded within it. Many MSMs (men who have sex with men) utilize these vocabularies for communication, primarily through online dating apps. This study aims to uncover the registers within the gay community and explore how their meanings correspond with their literal meanings in the English language. The research employs a case study method of qualitative approach and applies Leech’s seven types of meaning theory (1981) for analysis. The findings reveal that gay registers convey connotative, reflected, social, and collocative meanings. Connotative meaning is the most commonly used, followed by reflected, collocative, and social meaning. Connotative meanings are frequently employed because the gay community assigns codes to various concepts based on their real-world references. The study sheds light on how queer communities, particularly MSMs in Surabaya, use coded language as a tool for navigating conservative societal pressures. This highlights the adaptability of marginalized groups in protecting their identities, emphasizing the importance of language as valid form of expression and resistance. Future research could expand to other regions with similar or differing cultural contexts, allowing for comparative analysis of coded language usage among MSMs in various conservative environments and providing a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.
Downloads
References
Agha, A. (2006). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ambarsari, N. R., & Rusnaningtias, E. (2016). The Study of Register Used by Doctors and Nurses at Adi Husada Undaan Wetan Hospital Surabaya. Anglicist Volume 05 No, 1.
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chaer, A. & Leonie, A. (1995). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Dawson, C. (2009). An Introduction to Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford: How to Content.
Duranti, A. (2006). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522
Edwards, J. (2009). Language and Identity. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Glassgold, J. M. (2022). Research on Sexual Orientation Change Efforts: A Summary.
Glenn, N. D., & Hill, L. (1977). Rural-Urban Differences in Attitudes and Behavior in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627742900105
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language In a Social-Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. England: Pearson Educated Limited.
Huang, G., Cai, M., & Lu, X. (2019). Inferring Opinions and Behavioral Characteristics of Gay Men with Large Scale Multilingual Text from Blued. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193597
Joseph, J. E. (2004). Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
Leech, G. (1981). Semantics: The Study of Meaning (2nd ed.). England, Penguin Books Ltd.
Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research Methods in Linguistics. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
North, B. (2014). The CEFR in practice (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Omar, Y. Z. (2012). The Challenges of Denotative and Connotative Meaning for Second-Language Learners In ETC: A Review of General Semantics (Vol. 69, Issue 3).
Putra, N. N., & Aditiawarman, M. (2019). The Study of Gay Slang in Bungus Teluk Kabung Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3383440
Yunira, S., Pradina, S., Sumbayak, M., Putri, N. S., & Derin, T. (2019). Journal of Research and Innovation in Language Re-Visits the Grand Theory of Geoffrey Leech: Seven Types of Meaning ARTICLE HISTORY (Vol. 1, Issue 3). http://ojs.journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J.M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 220
,
PDF Downloads: 137
