Enhancing Concept Comprehension and Recall through Imagery: The Case for International Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v4n1.p1-11Keywords:
Concepts, comprehension, recall, imageryAbstract
Teaching new marketing concepts to international students (from non-native speaking backgrounds) often poses challenges for lecturers. Past assessment results show that brand development strategies are poorly understood by international students studying a marketing principles course at an Australian tertiary institution. Students find difficulties in conceptualising the various brand development strategies via purely written and verbal description even when many examples are given. Therefore alternative pedagogical strategies are required to enhance students learning of particular concepts An empirical study, drawing upon cognitive psychology theory, was undertaken to determine whether an intervention strategy of using greater visual cues enhances international students understanding and recall of the brand extension concept. The study was conducted with two business diploma classes undertaking a first year university marketing principles course. The intervention class was taught the concept with diagrams using relevant pictorial cues. The control class was taught the same concept with diagrams alone. Both groups were tested for understanding and recall of the concept after one week. Participant test results and survey questionnaires support the hypothesis that the addition of picture cues enhances students comprehension as they mitigate the cognitive load caused by English vocabulary deficits. Picture cues prompted greater connections with students prior knowledge increasing meaning construction and the verbal and visual encoding enabled elaborate processing resulting in higher recall of the concepts. Additionally participants metacognitive reports proved the brand extension concept easier to recall when taught with imagery. These results indicate increased use of imagery can be a cost-effective strategy to enhance student learning when demonstrating new concepts to international students.
References
Anderson, J.R. (2010). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (7th edition). New York: Worth.
Askell-Williams, H., Lawson, M.J., & Skrzypiec, G. (2012). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons. Instructional Science, 40, 413-443.
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borkowski, J. G., Wehing, R. S., & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46-53.
Bower, G.H., Karlin, M.B., & Dueck, A. (1975). Comprehension and memory for pictures. Memory & Cognition, 3, 216-220.
Bruning, R.H., Schraw, G.J., & Norby, M.N. (2011). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (5th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General. 119, 63-76.
Hummel, H. G. K., & Nadolski R.J. (2002). Cueing for schema construction: designing problem-solving multimedia practicals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 229-249.
Kotler, P., Brown, L., Burton, S., Deans, K., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Marketing (8th edition). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833-846.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pressley, M. (1995). Introduction: good thinking, good teaching, and alternative ways of studying good thinking and good teaching. In M.
Pressley & C. McCormick (Eds.), Cognition, teaching, and assessment (pp. 1-24). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 43, 274-280.
Watkins, D.A., & Biggs, J.B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences. Camberwell Melbourne Victoria: Comparative, Education Research Centre Hong Kong and The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
Wyra, M., Lawson, M.J., & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of bidirectional retrieval training and the ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17, 360-371.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

