Development of History Textbooks using Model MORE (Model, Observe, Reflect, Explain)

Authors

  • Sutoyo Budiharto MA Negeri 1, Pontianak
  • Nasution Nasution Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ismet Basuki Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v2n1.p21-26

Keywords:

textbook, history learning, model MORE

Abstract

Development research aims to produce effective historical textbooks for use in historical learning. Historical textbooks developed using the learning model MORE (model, observe, reflect, explain). The type of research is development by adapting the Thiagarajan 4-D development model. Data collection techniques in this study used a sheet of validation, questionnaire, observation, and test. Data obtained from the results of the study were analyzed by statistical and descriptive tests. The empirical test in this study used themethod pre-experimental withdesign one group pretest posttest. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPS 2 at MAN 1 Pontianak. Research results, 1) The quality of the history textbook model MORE has good quality based on the evaluation of the validator. 2) Historical textbooks using themodel MORE can have a significant influence on historical learning.

Author Biographies

Sutoyo Budiharto, MA Negeri 1, Pontianak

MA Negeri 1, Pontianak

Nasution Nasution, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Ismet Basuki, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

References

Ahmadi dan Amri. (2014). Pengembangan dan model pembelajaran tematik integratif. Jakarta: prestasi pustaka.

Carillo, L., Chis. L., & Dwan R. (2015). Enhancing science teaching by doing. The Science Teacher, 60-64.

Creswell, J.W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset memilih diantara lima pendekatan, Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Culsum, N. T. U., Helsy, I. F., & Imelda. (2013). Kemampuan siswa menghubungkan tiga level representasi melalui model MORE (Model-Observe-Reflect-Explain). Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2013 (SNIPS 2013). 159-163.

Daryanto dan Dwicahyono. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran (silabus, rpp, phb, bahan ajar). Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Kemendikbud, (2016). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan No. 8 tentang buku yang digunakan oleh satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kosasih, E. (2014). Strategi belajar dan pembelajaran implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Prastowo, A. (2013). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Yogyakarta:Diva Press.

Riduwan. (2015). Metode dan teknik menyusun tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S. D. S., and Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children a sourcebook. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University.

Minh, T. H. N. (2011). Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school texbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence?. RELC Journal. 42(1), 17-30. DOI: 10.1177/0033688210390265.

Bruhn, A. L. & Hasselbering, T. S. (2013). Insreasing student access to contente area textbooks. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(1), 30 38. DOI: 10.1177/1053451213480030.

Faas, D & Ross, W. (2012). Identity, diversity and citizenship: a critical analysis of textbooks and curricula in Irish schools. International Sociology, 27(4), 574 591. DOI: 10.1177/0268580911423057.

Howson, G. (2013). The development of mathematics textbooks: historical reflections from a personal perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 647658. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0511-9.

Gurung, R & Landrum, R. E. (2012). Comparing student perceptions of textbooks: does liking influence learning? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 144-150. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.

Maher, A. (2004). Learning outcomes in higher education: implications for curriculum design and student learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education. 3(2),. DOI:10.3794/johlste.32.78.

Micheal, N., Carter III, J, J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: an empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 397-418. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.

Frye, R. (1999). Assessment, accountability, and student learning outcomes. Office of Survey Research. 430.https://cedar.wwu.edu/surveyresearch_docs/430.

Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 9(1), 87-98. DOI 10.1108/14676370810842201.

Trigwell, K & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-26.

Yang, D. C & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2017). An analysis of singaporean versus indonesian textbooks based on trigonometry content. ‚Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7). DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a

Downloads

Published

2019-07-26

How to Cite

Budiharto, S., Nasution, N., & Basuki, I. (2019). Development of History Textbooks using Model MORE (Model, Observe, Reflect, Explain). The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 2(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v2n1.p21-26

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 374 , PDF Downloads: 264

Most read articles by the same author(s)