Analysis of Radiographic Image Quality in Computed Radiography with Variations in Subject Thickness and AEC Sensitivity Settings

Authors

  • Tsany Najmah Aziz Yenuuar Universitas Andalas
  • Sri Oktamuliani Universitas Andalas

Keywords:

Computed Radiography, AuAtomatic Exposure Control, Image Quality, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Exposure Index

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of subject thickness variations and Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) sensitivity on radiographic image quality in Computed Radiography (CR) systems. A total of 16 radiographic images were analyzed, consisting of 12 images obtained from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms and 4 images from the TOR CDR phantom. Experiments were conducted using phantoms with thicknesses of 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm. Radiographic exposures were performed at a fixed tube voltage of 70 kV, with the AEC system automatically adjusting the tube current-time product (mAs). For each PMMA thickness, exposures were repeated three times to evaluate Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), contrast, and Exposure Index (EI), while TOR CDR images were acquired once per thickness variation. Image quality was assessed through Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), contrast, and Exposure Index (EI) using ImageJ software and One-way ANOVA statistical testing. Results demonstrated that while the AEC effectively maintains contrast (p = 0.202) and EI (p = 0.796) within optimal diagnostic ranges, the SNR decreases significantly as subject thickness increases (p = 0.001). Optimal image quality was achieved at 10 cm for the TOR CDR phantom and 15 cm for the PMMA phantom. The study concludes that although AEC regulates dose consistency, additional protocol optimization is necessary for subjects exceeding 20 cm to mitigate SNR degradation caused by scattered radiation.

References

[1] Susilo., W. S. Budi, G.B. Suparta., dan Kusminarto., “Kajian Radiografi Digital Tulang Tangan,” Berk. Fis., vol. 16, no. 1, hal. 15–20, 2013.

[2] R. Firman, “Perkembangan dan Penggunaan Radiograf Dalam Bidang Kedokteran,” J. Indones. Dent. Assos., hal. 319–22, 2003.

[3] M. Irsal, “Evaluasi Exposure Index terhadap Faktor Eksposi dengan Metode 15% kVp Rule Of Thumb Pada Pemeriksaan Radiografi Kepala Proyeksi AP,” J. Ilmu dan Teknol. Kesehat., vol. 12, no. 2, hal. 62–68, 2021. DOI : https://10.33666/jitk.v12i2.414

[4] P. Irma Wulandari, “Exposure Index (Ei) Sebagai Alat Optimisasi Pada Sistem Radiografi Digital: Implementasi Dan Tantangan Bagi Radiografer,” JRI (Jurnal Radiogr. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 1–10, 2023. DOI : https://10.55451/jri.v6i1.167

[5] E. Sparzinanda, N. Nehru, dan N. Nurhidayah, “Pengaruh Faktor Eksposi Terhadap Kualitas Citra Radiografi,” J. Online Phys., vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 14–22, 2018. DOI : https:// 10.22437/jop.v3i1.4428

[6] E. D. Frank, B. W. Long, dan B. J. Smith, Merrill’s Atlas of Radiographic Positioning and Procedures, Keduabelas., vol. 2. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.

[7] D. R. Dance, S. H. Evans, C. L. Skinner, dan A. G. Bradley, Diagnostic Radiology with X-Rays, Kedua. Webb’s Physics of Medical Imaging, 2016.

[8] S. Rasad, Radiologi Diagnostik, Kedua. FKUI, 2005.

[9] J. Papp, Quality Management in The Imaging Sciences, Fourth. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, 2011.

[10] S. Mazzocchi dkk., “AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 117, no. 1–3, hal. 169–173, 2019. DOI : https:// 10.1093/rpd/nci743

[11] L. Fitriana dan H. S. Utami, “Perbedaan Nilai Image Noise Dan Dosis Radiasi Dengan Menggunakan Automatic Exposure Control (Aec) Pada Pemeriksaan Ct Scan,” J. Kesehat., vol. 12, no. 2, hal. 131–136, 2021. DOI : https:// 10.38165/jk.v12i2.259

[12] H. Kawashima, K. Ichikawa, S. Hanaoka, dan K. Matsubara, “Optimizing image quality using automatic exposure control based on the signal-difference-to-noise ratio: a phantom study,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., vol. 42, no. 3, hal. 803–810, 2019. DOI : https:// 10.1007/s13246-019-00784-z

[13] U. Nations, S. Committee, dan A. Radiation, SOURCES , EFFECTS AND RISKS OF IONIZING RADIATION United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2021 ed., vol. 4. 2022.

[14] Seeram E, Digital Radiogaphy: An Introduction. Clifton Park: Delmar, 2011.

[15] T. S. R. Paul, Radiologic Technology at a Glance, Kesatu. New York: Delmar Cangage Learning, 2012.

[16] R. Adler, A., dan Carlton, Introduction to Radiologic and Imaging Sciences and Patient Care, Sixth. Missouri: Elsevier, 2016.

[17] S. P. Fauzya, “Effect of Tube Voltage (kV) on Radiographic Image Quality of TOR-CDR Phantom Object,” J. Fis., vol. 12, no. 2, hal. 83–88, Nov 2022. DOI : https:// 10.15294/jf.v12i2.39746

[18] R. Y. L. Chu, J. Fisher, B. R. Archer, B. J. Conway, dan M. M. Goodsit, “AAPM Report No. 31: Standardized Methods for Measuring Diagnostic X-Ray Esposures,” New York, USA Am. Assoc. Phys. Med. by Am. Inst. Phys., 2005.

[19] K. Matre dan O. H. Gilja, “Medical imaging,” Fundam. Med. Ultrason., hal. 147–176, 2011. DOI : https:// 10.1201/9781482266641-12

[20] D. Fauber, R., dan Orth, Radiographic Imaging and Exposure, Kelima. Missouri: Elsevier Inc., 2012.

[21] P. Rahmawanti, M. Irsal, G. Sari, J. T. Radiodiagnostik, dan D. Radioterapi, “Pengaruh Variasi Exposure Index Terhadap Penilaian Kualitas Subjektif Pada Pemeriksaan Lumbosacral,” J. Teor. dan Apl. Fis., vol. 10, no. 01, hal. 129–136, 2022. DOI : https:// 10.23960/jtaf.v10i1.2922

[22] Z. M. Rashid, S. N. Kbah, dan Z. H. Al-Sawaff, “An Estimation of X-radiation dose using Kvp and Mas.,” Solid State Technol., vol. 63, no. 3, hal. 4323–4327, 2020.

[23] K. E. Rupidara, Analisa Pengaruh Variasi Tegangan Tabung Sinar-X Terhadap Profil Gray Level Pada Citra Phantom TOR CDR, Skripsi Sarjana. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2022.

[24] U. Wiharja, A. Kodir, dan A. Bahar, “Analisa Uji Kesesuaian Pesawat Sinar-X Radiografi,” hal. 0–7, 2019.

[25] H. Kawashima, K. Ichikawa, D. Nagasou, dan M. Hattori, “X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for abdominal digital radiography: evaluation using signal difference-to-noise ratio,” Phys. Medica, vol. 34, hal. 65–71, 2017. DOI : https:// 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.015

[26] M. Mahesh, “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Third Edition.,” Med. Phys., vol. 40, no. 7, Jul 2013. DOI : https:// 10.1118/1.4811156

[27] N. W. Marshall, “An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 54, no. 15, hal. 4645, 2019. DOI : https:// 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/002

[28] Y. Funama, Y. Sugaya, dan O. Miyazaki, “Automatic exposure control at MDCT based on the contrast-to-noise ratio : Theoretical background and phantom study,” Phys. Medica, vol. 29, no. 1, hal. 39–47, 2013. DOI: https//10.24252/jft.v7i2.18067

[29] S. Zelviani, “Pengaruh Tegangan Tabung (Kv) pada Pemeriksaan Thorax terhadap Kualitas Citra Radiografi dengan Analisis Aplikasi Image-J,” J. Fis. dan Ter., vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 139–148, 2020. DOI : https:// 10.24252/jft.v7i2.18067

[30] C. S. Moore dkk., “An investigation of automatic exposure control calibration for chest imaging with a computed radiography system,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 59, no. 9, hal. 2307–2324, 2014. DOI : https:// 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2307

[31] I. Ketut Putra, G. Agung, A. Ratnawati, dan G. N. Sutapa, “Monitoring of Patients Using Radiodiagnostic Dosage EI (Exposure Index) on CR (Computed Radiography),” Int. Res. J. Eng., vol. 6, no. 6, hal. 45–49, 2020. DOI : https:// 10.21744/irjeis.v6n6.1029

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Tsany Najmah Aziz Yenuuar and Sri Oktamuliani (2026) “Analysis of Radiographic Image Quality in Computed Radiography with Variations in Subject Thickness and AEC Sensitivity Settings”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 15(1). Available at: https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa/article/view/41051 (Accessed: 7 June 2026).

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 133