Development of Bifocal Modeling Practicum to Harmonic Vibrations as Innovation in Physics Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v14n2.p184-198Keywords:
bifocal modelling, harmonic vibrations, Innovation of physics learning, IoT, 21st-century skillsAbstract
The era of Industry 5.0 requires physics education to adapt to technological advancements. Students often struggle to understand abstract concepts due to the limitations of tools and methods of learning that are less interactive. This research aims to develop a prototype for a harmonic vibration practical that integrates the Internet of Things (IoT), Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) into a single Bifocal Modelling device. This approach allows students to see the application of physics concepts in real-time, enriching their learning experience. The method used is Research and Development (R&D), which consists of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE). The research results indicate that the use of this technology can enhance student engagement and help them understand the differences between the ideal model and real phenomena. Thus, students not only learn theory but also experience firsthand that makes learning more engaging. In addition, the integration of this technology equips students with the 21st-century skills needed in an increasingly complex job market. This research is expected to provide solutions to the challenges in physics teaching and pave the way for further research related to the application of technology. In this way, the integration of technology in physics education can prepare students to face the complexities of the modern workforce.
References
Kadir MAA. What Teacher Knowledge Matters in Effectively Developing Critical Thinkers in the 21 st Century Curriculum?. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2017; 23: 79–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.011.
Parker J, Asare I, Badu C, and Ossei-Anto TA. Examining The Use of 21st-Century Teaching Skills in Basic School Science Classrooms. European Journal of Education and Pedagogu. 2022; 3(4): 28–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.4.393.
Walsh C, Quinn KN, Wieman C, and Holmes NG. Quantifying Critical Thinking: Development and Validation of The Physics Lab Inventory of Critical Thinking. Physical Review Physics Education Research 2019; . 15(1): 10135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010135.
Palmgren E and Rasa T. Modelling Roles of Mathematics in Physics: Perspectives for Physics Education. Science and Education. 2024; 33: 365-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00393-5.
Sunardi S, Suhandi A, Darmawan D, and Muslim M. Investigation of Student Difficulties in Physics Learning and Readiness to Implement Physics Learning Using Bifocal Modeling-Based Practicum in Indonesia. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2022; 11(4): 1091–1102. Available from: https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/6609.
Klein P, Viiri J, and Kuhn J. Visual Cues Improve Students’ Understanding of Divergence and Curl: Evidence from Eye Movements During Reading and Problem Solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research 2019; . 15(1): 010126 DOI . : https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010126.
Alsina Á and Salgado M. Understanding Early Mathematical Modelling: First Steps in the Process of Translation Between Real-world Contexts and Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2022; 20: 1719–1742. DOI: https://doi.org10.1007/s10763-021-10232-8.
Savall-Alemany F, Guisasola J, Cintas SR, and Martínez-Torregrosa J. Problem-Based Structure for A Teaching-Learning Sequence to Overcome Students’ Difficulties When Learning About Atomic Spectra. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2019; 15(2): 020138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020138.
Schermerhorn BP and Thompson JR. Physics Students’ Construction and Checking of Differential Volume Elements in An Unconventional Spherical Coordinate System. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2019; 15(1): 010112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010112.
Saglam-Arslan A and Devecioglu A. Student Teachers’ Levels of Understanding and Model of Understanding About Newton’s Laws of Motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 2010; 11(1): 7. Available from: https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v11_issue1/arslan/index.htm.
Blikstein P, Fuhrmann T, and Salehi S. Using The Bifocal Modeling Framework to Resolve ‘Discrepant Events’ Between Physical Experiments and Virtual Models in Biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2016; 25: 513-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9623-7.
Fuhrmann T, Schneider B, and Blikstein P. Should Students Design or Interact with Models? Using the Bifocal Modelling Framework to Investigate Model Construction in High School Science. International Journal of Science Education. 2018; 40(8): 867-893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1453175.
Blikstein P, Fuhrmann T, Greene D, and Salehi S. Bifocal Modeling: Mixing Real and Virtual Labs for Advanced Science Learning. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. Bremen: Association for Computing Machinery. 2012; 296–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307150.
Evangelou F and Kotsis K. Real vs Virtual Physics Experiments: Comparison of Learning Outcomes Among Fifth Grade Primary School Students. A Case on The Concept of Frictional Force. International Journal of Science Education. 2019; 41(3): 330–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1549760.
Sunardi S, Suhandi A, Darmawan D, and Muslim M. Investigation of Facilities and Students’ Readiness in Supporting Implementation of Nodemcu-Based Bifocal Modeling Physics Practicum. Momentum: Physics Education Journal. 2023; 7(1): 145–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.7485.
Eynde S, Goedhart M, Deprez J, and De Cock M. Role of Graphs in Blending Physical and Mathematical Meaning of Partial Derivatives in the Context of the Heat Equation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2023; 21(1): 25–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10237-3.
Wang L, Deng H, Zhong FY, Chen C, and Li Q. Integral Imaging Display with Enhanced Depth of Field Based on Bifocal Lens Array. Journal of The Society for Information Display. 2021; 29(9): 689-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.1018.
Setiawan A, Malik A, Suhandi A, and Permanasari A. Effect of Higher Order Thinking Laboratory on the Improvement of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering. 2018; 306(1): 012008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012008.
Tang KS, Lin SW, and Kaur B. Mapping and Extending the Theoretical Perspectives of Reading in Science and Mathematics Education Research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2022; 20: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10322-1.
Blikstein P. Bifocal Modeling: Promoting Authentic Scientific Inquiry Through Exploring and Comparing Real and Ideal Systems Linked in Real-Time. In: A. Nijholt (eds). Playful User. Singapore: Springer; 2014: 317–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-96-2_15.
National Research Council. Adapting to a Changing World - Challenges and Opportunities in Undergraduate Physics Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/18312.
Rzig DE, Iqbal N, Attisano I, Qin X, and Hassan F. Virtual Reality (VR) Automated Testing in the Wild: A Case Study on Unity-Based VR Applications. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. Washington: Association for Computing Machinery; 2023: 1269–1281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3597926.3598134.
Ouahi MB, Zghida N, Omari S, Belhadj K, Chakir EM, and Tan EM. Effects of the Combination of Real and Virtual Labs Based on the 5E Learning Cycle Model on Electrical Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2024; 13(2): 274–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i2.4022.
Elfeky AIM, Najmi AH, and Elbyaly MYH. The Impact of Advance Organizers in Virtual Classrooms on The Development of Integrated Science Process Skills. PeerJ Computer Science. 2024; 10: e1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1989.
Sujito S, Sulur S, Hudha MN, Winarno N, and Sunardi S. Enhanced Learning: Designing Bifocal Modeling Practicum Tools with ESP32 for Exploring Kinetic Theory of Gases. Momentum: Physics Education Journal. 2024; 8(2): 249–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i2.10046.
Christopoulos A, Pellas N, Qushem UB, and Laakso MJ. Comparing The Effectiveness of Video and Stereoscopic 360° Virtual Reality-Supported Instruction in High School Biology Courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023; 54(4): 987-1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13306.
Sutaphan S and Yuenyong C. Enhancing Grade Eight Students’ Creative Thinking in The Water STEM Education Learning Unit. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2023; 42(1): 120–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i1.36621.
Simbolon DH and Silalahi EK. Physics Learning Using Guided Inquiry Models Based on Virtual Laboratories and Real Laboratories to Improve Learning. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 2023; 6(1): 55–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.61000.
Sebatana MJ and Dudu WT. Reality or Mirage: Enhancing 21st-Century Skills Through Problem-Based Learning While Teaching Particulate Nature of Matter. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2022; 20(5): 963–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10206-w.
Preus B. Authentic Instruction for 21st Century Learning: Higher Order Thinking in an Inclusive School. American Secondary Education. 2012; 40(3): 59–79. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43694141.
Dwyer CP, Hogan MJ, and Stewart I. An Integrated Critical Thinking Framework for The 21st Century. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014; 12: 43–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
Bing TJ and Redish EF. Analyzing Problem Solving Using Math in Physics: Epistemological Framing Via Warrants. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2009; 5(2): 020108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020108.
Achmetli K, Schukajlow S, and Rakoczy K. Multiple Solutions for Real-World Problems,
. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2019; 17(8): 1605–1625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9936-5.
Permatasari BD, Gunarhadi, and Riyadi. The Influence of Problem Based Learning Towards Social Science Learning Outcomes Viewed from Learning Interest. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). 2019; 8(1): 39–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15594.
Moghaddam BP, Lopes AM, Machado JAT, and Mostaghim ZS. Computational Scheme for Solving Nonlinear Fractional Stochastic Differential Equations with Delay. Stochastic Analysis and Applications. 2019; 37(6): 893-908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2019.1621182.
Husnaini SJ and Chen S. Effects of Guided Inquiry Virtual and Physical Laboratories on Conceptual Understanding, Inquiry Performance, Scientific Inquiry Self-Efficacy, and Enjoyment. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2019; 15(1): 010119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010119.
Wörner S, Kuhn J, and Scheiter K. The Best of Two Worlds: A Systematic Review on Combining Real and Virtual Experiments in Science Education. Review of Educational Research. 2022; 92(6): 911–952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221079417.
Vogelstein L and Brady C. Taking The Patch Perspective: A Comparative Analysis of A Patch Based Participatory Simulation. In K. Lund, G.P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019. Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences; 2019: 512-519. Available from: https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/4447.
Muslihah F, Winarno N, Fajarwati A, and Sujito S. Enhancing Students’ Nature of Science Using STEM Engineering Design Process in Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures Topic. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan. 2024; 13(2): 1479–1498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.567.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the JPFA with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
Abstract views: 17
,
PDF Downloads: 8
, PDF Downloads: 0
