Effectiveness of Laboratory Physical Modeling in Acquiring the Response of Time Domain Induced Polarization (TDIP)

Authors

  • Y Yatini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Djoko Santoso Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Agus Laesanpura Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Budi Sulistijo Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v12n1.p34-46

Keywords:

TDIP response, resistivity, chargeability, physical modeling, metal mineral content.

Abstract

Induced Polarization (IP) is one of the Geophysical methods that utilize the polarization properties of the rocks for metallic mineral exploration. The problems are how to distinguish the metallic minerals deposit based on the chargeability. The physical modeling of IP is used to study the behavior of TDIP response. The study of a simple mathematical model is carried out to obtain the theoretical curves which are presented as the subsurface parameter. These curves are used as a reference to assess the result of physical modeling. The laboratory physical modeling uses a tank model with a size of (200x100x70) cm3, with a block as a target and water as a host medium. The results show laboratory physical modeling which has been made is quietly good. The approximate position and geometry of the target can be identified. The resistivity inversion modeling is sensitive to recognizing the geometry and position, while the chargeability inversion is on the distribution of metallic minerals. The quantitative correlation between chargeability and iron-ore content is obtained by Dipole-dipole and Wenner configuration. Both are connected exponentially, with a different exponential constant for different block targets.

References

Evrard M, Dumont G, Hermans T, Chouteau M, Francis O, Pirard E, and Nguyen F. Geophysical Investigation of the Pb–Zn Deposit of Lontzen–Poppelsberg, Belgium. Minerals. 2018; 8(6): 233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min8060233.

Dusabemariya C, Qian W, Bagaragaza W, Faruwa A, and Ali M. Some experiences of resistivity and induced polarization methods on the exploration of sulfide: A review. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2020; 8(11): 68-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.811004.

Taha A, Ismail A, Massoud U, Mesbah H, and Komarov V. Induced Polarization Measurements for Gold Exploration at the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Bulletin of Earth Sciences of Thailand. 2021; 2(1): 20–30. Available from: https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bestjournal/article/view/246464.

Mau D, Revil A, and Hinton J. Induced polarization response of porous media with metallic particles—Part 4: Detection of metallic and nonmetallic targets in time-domain-induced polarization tomography. Geophysics. 2016; 81(4): D359–D375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0480.1.

Yatini Y, Santoso D, Laesanpura A, and Sulistijo B. Physical Modeling on Time Domain Induced Polarization (TDIP) Response of Metal Mineral Content. Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics. 2018; 8(2): 57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v8i1.20648

Dakir I, Benamara A, Aassoumi H, Ouallali A, and Bahammou YA. Application of induced polarization and resistivity to the determination of the location of metalliferous veins in the Taroucht and Tabesbaste areas (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco). International Journal of Geophysics. 2019; 2019: 5849019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5849019.

Gurin G, Titov K, Ilyin Y, and Tarasov A. Induced polarization of disseminated electronically conductive minerals: a semi-empirical model. Geophysical Journal Internasional. 2015; 200(3): 1555–1565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu490.

Essa KS and Munschy M. Mineral Exploration from the Point of View of Geophysicists. In Minerals. London: IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84830.

Araffa SA, Mansour SA, Santos FM, and Helaly A. Geophysical exploration for gold and associated minerals, case study: Wadi El Beida area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 2009; 6(4): 345–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/4/002.

Alfouzan FA, Alotaibi AM, Cox LH, and Zhdanov MS. Spectral induced polarization survey with distributed array system for mineral exploration: Case study in Saudi Arabia. Minerals. 2020; 10(9): 769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090769.

Maurya PK, Balbarini N, Moller I, Ronde V, Christiansen AV, Bjerg PL, Auken E, and Fiandaca G. Subsurface imaging of water electrical conductivity, hydraulic permeability and lithology at contaminated sites by induced polarization. Geophysics Journal Internasional. 2018; 213(2): 770–785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy018.

Revil A, Ahmed AS, Coperey A, Ravanel L, Sharma R, and Panwar N. Induced polarization as a tool to characterize shallow landslides. Journal of Hydrology. 2020; 589: 125369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125369.

Olsson PI, Fiandaca G, Maurya PK, Dahlin T, and Auken E. Effect of current pulse duration in recovering quantitative induced polarization models from time-domain full-response and integral chargeability data. Geophysical Journal Internasional. 2019; 218(3): 1739–1747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz236.

Li J, Liu JX, Tong XZ and Guo ZW. The Physical Modeling Experiments Analysis of the Exploration Depth of Conventional Electric Survei. PIERS Proceedings. Xi’an. China, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v8i1.20648

Devi PP, Prasad PR, Rajesh R, Padalu G and Sarma VS. Efficacy of electrode arrays in resistivity prospecting using physical modelling. The Journal of Indian Geophysical Union. 2014; 18(1): 85–97.

Yatini Y, Santoso D, Laesanpura A, and Sulistijo B. Studi Pemodelan Respon Polarisasi Terinduksi dalam Kawasan Waktu (TDIP) terhadap Kandungan Mineral Logam, Sebuah Hasil Awal. Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics. 2017; 4(2): 162–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v4i02.4984

Yatini Y, Santoso D, and Laesanpura A. Physical Modeling Studies of the Time Domain Induced Polarization (TDIP) Response, Case: Homogeneous Isotropic Medium. Proceedings 3rd Annual Basic Science International Conference (BaSIC). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Malang; 2013. Available from: http://eprints.upnyk.ac.id/18691/1/2013-Basic.pdf

Kingman JEE, Ritchie TJ, and Rowston P. Induced polarization chargeability calibration standards. ASEG Extended Abstracts. 2019; 2019(1): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073143.

Turai E, Turtogtokh B, Dobróka M, and Baracza MK. Newer results of Monte Carlo inversion of IP data in water base protection and ore exploration. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica. 2021; 56(4): 667–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-021-00352-6.

Mary B, Saracco G, Peyras L, Vennetier M, Meriaux P, and Camerlynck C. Mapping tree root system in dikes using induced polarization: Focus on the influence of soil water content. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2016; 135: 387–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.05.005.

Loke MH, Chambers JE, and Ogilvy RD. Inversion of 2D spectral induced polarization imaging data. Geophysical Prospecting. 2006; 54(3): 287–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00537.x.

Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF, Kuras O, and Wilkinson PB. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2013; 95: 135–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017.

Loke MH. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys; 2004. Available from: https://sites.ualberta.ca/~unsworth/UA-classes/223/loke_course_notes.pdf.

Yatini Y and Laesanpura A. Influence of potential’s electrode selection on physical modeling of time domain induced polarization (TDIP), case studies of homogeneous isotropic medium. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2013; 1554(1): 245–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4820331.

Apparao A, Srinivas GS, Sarma VS, Thomas PJ, Joshi MS, and Prasad PR. Depth of detection of highly conducting and volume polarizable targets using induced polarization. Geophysical Prospecting. 2001; 48(5): 797–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00212.x.

Ward SH. The resistivity and induced polarization methods. In Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 1990; 147-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802785.ch6.

Jougnot D, Ghorbani A, Revil A, Leroy P, and Cosenza P. Spectral induced polarization of partially saturated clay-rocks: A mechanistic approach. Geophysical Journal Internasional. 2010; 180(1): 210–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04426.x.

Gainullin IK. Theoretical investigation of the ion-induced polarization-charge influence on resonant charge transfer. Physical Review A. 2019; 100(3): 032712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032712.

Dahlin T and Loke M H. Negative apparent chargeability in time-domain induced polarisation data. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2015; 123: 322–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.08.012.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Yatini, Y., Santoso, D., Laesanpura, A. and Sulistijo, B. (2022) “Effectiveness of Laboratory Physical Modeling in Acquiring the Response of Time Domain Induced Polarization (TDIP)”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 12(1), pp. 34–46. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v12n1.p34-46.

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 223 , PDF Downloads: 279