Analysis of the Characteristics of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test on Momentum and Impulse for Senior High School Student Using Item Response Theory

Authors

  • Aulia Rahman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Heni Rusnayati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Muslim Muslim Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v11n2.p127-137

Keywords:

Higher Order Thinking Skills, Item Response Theory, Momentum Impulse, Techniques of testing, Theory of testing and techniques

Abstract

Currently, 21st-century skills are needed by students, especially Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), to meet the needs of the rapidly growing world of work. It is necessary to provide debriefing during learning activities to meet these needs. Besides that, a quality instrument is needed to measure the skills of each student, the more information that the instrument can provide shows that the instrument is getting better. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of the Higher Order Thinking Skills test on momentum and impulse consisting of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discrimination index based on item response theory analysis. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach and a One-Shot Design research design. The population was second-year senior high school students in Bandung. Meanwhile, the sample of this study consisted of 122 second-year senior high school students who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. The instrument used was the Higher Order Thinking Skills test on momentum and impulse. Based on the result, 16 items were categorized as valid. Besides, the reliability of the test instrument was good. For the level of difficulty, an item was categorized as very difficult, an item was difficult, twelve items were medium, three items were easy, and an item was very easy. Lastly, for the discrimination index, thirteen items were considered good, and five items did not classify as good.

Author Biographies

Aulia Rahman, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Departement of Physics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Heni Rusnayati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Departement of Physics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Muslim Muslim, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Departement of Physics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

References

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Pendidikan Karakter Dorong Tumbuhnya Kompetensi Peserta didik Abad 21; 2017. Available from: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2017/06/pendidikan-karakter-dorong-tumbuhnya-kompetensi-siswa-abad-21#.

Anderson, L.W., & D. Krathwohl, D. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Bahan Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia; 2013. Available from: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/dokumen/Paparan/Paparan%20Wamendik.pdf.

Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PysTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 2014; 18(1): 1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120.

Sanjaya, W. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2008.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia; 2019. Available from: https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/hasil-un/.

OECD. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.

Arifin, Z. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2009.

Malik, A., Rosidin, U., & Ertikanto, C. Pengembagan Instrumen Asesmen HOTS Fisika SMA Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Lentera Pendidikan Pusat Penelitian LPPM UM METRO. 2018; 3(1): 11-25. Available from: http://doi.org/10.24127/jlpp.v3i1.733.

Anwar, S. Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi. Padang: UNP Press; 2009.

Anisa. Perbandingan Penskoran Dikotomi dan Politomi dalam Teori Respon Butir untuk Pengembangan Bank Soal Matakuliah Matematika Dasar. Jurnal Matematika Statistika & Komputasi. 2013; 9(2): 95-113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v9i2.3402.

Lord, F. M. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1980.

Naga, D.S. Pengantar Teori Skor pada Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penerbit Gunadarma; 1992.

Rakkapao, S., Prasitpong, S., & Arayathanitkul, K. Analysis test of understanding of vectors with three-parameter logistic model of item response theory and item response curve technique. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2016; 12(2): 1-10. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1103%2FPhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020135.

Rahmat. Panduan Analisis Butir tes; 2010. Available from: http://gurupembaharu.com/home/download/panduan-analisis-butir-soal.pdf.

Sudjana, N. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo; 2004.

Arikunto, S. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta; 2019.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV; 2017.

Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. Item Response Theory Principles and Application. Boston, MA: Kluwer Inc; 1985.

Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Tim Komunikata Publishing House; 2013.

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D. Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen: Revisi Takssonomi Pendidikan Bloom (Terjemahan: Prihantoro). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2010.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata; 2015.

Asbupel, F., M, D., & Sanova, A. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Kimia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2018; 53: 1–11. Available from: https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/3024.

Arikunto, S. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2015.

Setiyawan, R. A., & Wijayanti, P. S. Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika. 2020; 1(2): 130–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2.26.

Hakim, M.L., Ramalis, T.R., & Muslim. Karakteristik Tes Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Materi Elastisitas Menggunakan Analisis Item Response Theory. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. 2019; 10(1): 22- 32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v10i1.3318.

Saptawulan, W., Ramalis, T. R., & Muslim. Karakterisasi Tes Penalaran Ilmiah Materi Suhu dan Kalor Berdasarkan Teori Respon Butir. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (SINAFI). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 2018; 4(1): 41-48. Available from: http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/sinafi/article/view/370.

Retnawati, H. Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika; 2014.

Etkina, E., Gitomer, D., Iaconangelo, C., Phelps, G., Seeley, L., & Vokos, S. Design of an assessment to probe teacher’s content knowledge for teaching: An example from energy in high school physics. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH. 2018; 14. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010127.

Alnasraween, M, S., Al-mughrabi, A, M., Ammari, R, M., & Alkaramneh, M, S. Validity and reliability of eigh-grade digital culture test in light of item response theory. Cypriot Journal of Education Science. 2021; 16(4) 1816-1835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i4.6034.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Rahman, A., Rusnayati, H. and Muslim, M. (2021) “Analysis of the Characteristics of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test on Momentum and Impulse for Senior High School Student Using Item Response Theory”, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 11(2), pp. 127–137. doi: 10.26740/jpfa.v11n2.p127-137.

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 252 , PDF Downloads: 210