Pengaruh CAMELS terhadap Return on Asset pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Periode 2017-2020

Authors

  • Vivi Alingga Dewi Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jim.v10n1.p185-198

Keywords:

CAMELS, finance, foreign exchange national private commercial bank, ROA

Abstract

This research aims to determine the outcome of capital, asset, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk on Return on Assets in the foreign exchange national private commercial bank from 2017 to 2020. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data types obtained from the bank's annual report. This study uses purposes sampling techniques to get samples. The samples are 23 foreign exchange national private commercial banks. This research uses multiple linear regression analysis with SPSS 24 software. The results show only earnings proxied by BOPO influence Return on assets with adverse decisions because of low-interest income while operating costs are high. Capital does not affect ROA because some of the banking capital is used to overcome the failure of banking operations. The banking sector is not optimal in utilizing capital in services. The asset has no effect because of the high capital value to cover the risk of a non-performing loan. Management does not affect ROA because there is an adjustment process due to the increased interest rates in the previous year. Liquidity does not affect ROA because the lending value doesn't match the loan's quality. Sensitivity to market risk has no influence on Return on Asset because the difference in foreign exchange rates doesn't work correctly. Managers should use the annual report as an evaluation material and a basis for policymaking in the next period and multiply information to form the right strategy in maximizing company value in the eyes of stakeholders through profitability.

References

Ali, M. (2004). Asset Liability Management : Menyiasati Risiko Pasar dan Risiko Operasional dalam Perbankan. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Anh, L. H., Dong, L. S., Kreinovich, V., & Thach, N. N. (2018). Econometrics for Financial Applications. International Econometric Conference of Vietnam.

BPK RI. (2004). Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. (https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/137709/peraturan-bi-no-610pbi2004, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

BPK RI. (2008). Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum Bank Umum. (https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/137598/peraturan-bi-no-1015pbi2008, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

BPK RI. (2011). Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. (https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/137463/peraturan-bi-no-131pbi2011, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

BPK RI. (2013). Penetapan Status dan Tindak Lanjut Pengawasan Bank Umum Konvensional. (https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/137010/peraturan-bi-no-152pbi2013-tahun-2013, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

BPS. (2021). Biaya Operasional dan Pendapatan Operasional. (https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/index.php/indikator/459, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

BPS. (2021). Net Interest Margin (NIM). (https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/index.php/indikator/468, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan 2 (14th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Dendawijaya, L. (2005). Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kasmir. (2012). Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: PT Rajawali.

Kontan.co.id. (2020). Peran perbankan Sangat Besar dalam Menggerakkan Ekonomi Nasional. (https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/peran-perbankan-sangat-besar-dalam-menggerakkan-ekonomi-nasional, diakses pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2021).

Kontan.Co.Id. (2018). Pelemahan Rupiah Menggerus Cadangan Devisa. (https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pelemahan-rupiah-menggerus-cadangan-devisa, diakses pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2021).

Kuncoro, M., & Suhardjono. (2001). Manajemen Perbankan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Loen, B., & Ericson, S. (2008). Manajemen Aktiva Pasiva Bank Devisa: Pengetahuan Dasar Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Perbankan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

OJK. (2017). Bank Umum. (https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/Pages/Bank-Umum.aspx, diakses pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2021).

Pudjo, M. T. (2006). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Untuk Perbankan. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Putri, R. A., & Christiawan, Y. J. (2014). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, dan Leverage terhadap pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Accounting Review, 2(1), 61-70.

Riyadi, S. (2014). CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio). (https://dosen.perbanas.id/car-capital-adequacy-ratio/, diakses pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2021).

Romadloni, R. R., & Herizon, H. (2015). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Kualitas Aset, Sensitivitas Pasar, dan Efisiensi terhadap Return On Asset (ROA) pada Bank Devisa yang Go Public. Journal of Business & Banking, 5(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v5i1.477.

SahamU. (2015). Daftar Bank Umum Swasta Devisa. (https://www.sahamu.com/bank/bank-umum-swasta-nasional-busn-devisa/, diakses pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2021).

Widyaningrum, Setiawan, A., Sumartoyo, S. B., & Saifullah, A. (2019). Statistik Lembaga Keuangan. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Yildirim, H. H., & Ildokuz, B. (2020). Determining The Relationship Between CAMLS Variables and Profitability: An Application on Banks in the BIST Bank Index. In Contemporary Issues in Business, Economics and Finance Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, 104, 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1569-375920200000104017.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-28

How to Cite

Dewi, V. A. (2022). Pengaruh CAMELS terhadap Return on Asset pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Periode 2017-2020. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 10(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.26740/jim.v10n1.p185-198

Issue

Section

Artikel
Abstract views: 400 , PDF Downloads: 459

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.