Benz Limit Optimal Design for Double Fed Induction Generator and Kundru’s Multimachine integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/vubeta.v3i2.46268Keywords:
Benz limit, Controllers, Oscillations, Output voltage, Phase angleAbstract
The study explores the integration of an optimal Benz limit Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) with IEEE Kundur's test multi-machine power system, emphasizing the use of meta-heuristic algorithms and controllers.his work is scoped at the DFIG power coefficient, output voltage, and phase angle oscillations during integration. The controllers’ performances were compared with three techniques: the hippopotamus (HO), Sine cosine (SC), and Morth flame (MFO) algorithms to verify the competence of the proposed method in achieving better system stability. To improve the proposed Hybrid Multi-source integration of DFIG, Hydrogen Fuel Cell (HFC) to augment (Wind, Solar cell, Battery energy storage system), the proposed work presents the mathematical formulation of DAE, the designed models, and the implementation of wind aerodynamic/mechanical coupling shaft. ODE as solver in MATLAB 2021a Simulink environment as presented. The results presented an optimal Benz limit for the blade tip speed ratio = 8.1, blade pitch angle =0, rotor power coefficient = =0.48, and turbine output power =5 MW described by equation 7. A symmetrical fault was set up on bus 2 at t = 1 second; the governor load reference increased by 1%, the system loading by 1%; and a nonlinear time-domain simulation was carried out on the integrated network to assess controllers’ robustness Likewise, the result validates the usefulness of the proposed SC, HO, and MFO tuned Tilt, PID for DFIG output voltage and phase angle control that outperforms the traditional MFO tuning techniques in terms of resilience, efficiency, and convergence.
References
[1] S. Rajendran et al., “Wind Turbine Emulators—A Review,” Processes, vol. 11, p. 747, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030747.
[2] B. Dasu, M. Sivakumar, and R. Srinivasarao, “Interconnected multi-machine power system stabilizer design using whale optimization algorithm,” Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-019-0116-6.
[3] J. X. Jin, R. H. Yang, R. T. Zhang, Y. J. Fan, Q. Xie, and X. Y. Chen, “Combined low voltage ride through and power smoothing control for DFIG/PMSG hybrid wind energy conversion system employing a SMES-based AC-DC unified power quality conditioner,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 128, p. 106733, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106733.
[4] A, Sabo, B.Y, Kolapo, T.E, Odoh, M., Dyari, N.I, Abdul Wahab, V. Veerasamy, “Solar, Wind and Their Hybridization Integration for Multi-Machine Power System Oscillation Controllers Optimization: A Review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 24, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010024.
[5] N. K. Kumar et al., “Fuzzy Logic-Based Load Frequency Control in an Island Hybrid Power System Model Using Artificial Bee Colony Optimization,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 2199, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062199.
[6] A. Sabo et al., “A review on techniques used for solving the economic load dispatch problems: categorization, advantages, and limitations,” Vokasi UNESA Bulletin of Engineering, Technology and Applied Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–47, 2025. https://doi.org/10.26740/vubeta.v2i1.35591.
[7] G. Shahgholian and A. Fathollahi, “Analyzing Small-Signal Stability in a Multi-Source Single-Area Power System with a Load-Frequency Controller Coordinated with a Photovoltaic System,” AppliedMath, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 452–467, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath4020024.
[8] M Rawal; D.C Nauityal; M.S Rawat, “Analysis of small signal stability in DFIG integrated power system,” Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), Bhilai, India, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAECT49130.2021.9392505.
[9] A. Sabo et al., “Modified Multimachine Power System Design with DFIG-WECS and Damping Controller,” Energies, vol. 17, p. 1841, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081841.
[10] A. Benmessaoud Gabis, Y. Meraihi, S. Mirjalili, A. Ramdane-Cherif, and The Author(s), “A comprehensive survey of sine cosine algorithm: variants and applications,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10026-y.
[11] A. Sabo; T.E Odoh; H. Shahinzadeh; Z. Azimi; M. Moazzami. “Implementing Optimization Techniques in PSS Design for Multi-Machine Smart Power Systems: A Comparative Study,” Energies, vol. 16, 2465, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052465.
[12] M. H. Amiri et al., “Hippopotamus optimization algorithm: a novel nature‑inspired optimization algorithm,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, p. 5032, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54910-3.
[13] L. Kunjumuhammed; S. Kuenzel; B.C Pal. “Simulation of Power System with Renewables,” AcademicPress: Cambridge, MA, USA,2019; ISBN 0128112549.
[14] L. Kunjumuhammed., S. Kuenzel., and P. C. Bikash, “Simulation of power system with renewables,” United Kingdom, Academic Press. pp. 1-180, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811187-1.00001-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abel E. Airobman, Sabo Aliyu, Isiaka B. Musa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 6
,
PDF Downloads: 0
