Impact of a STEAM-SDGs-Based Virtual Reality Mathematics Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking and Creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/sjese.2.01.2026.4Keywords:
critical thinking, creativity, mathematics education, STEAM-SDGs integration, virtual realityAbstract
The integration of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in higher education has gained increasing attention as a strategy to foster essential 21st-century competencies. In mathematics learning, the use of Virtual Reality (VR) offers immersive and interactive experiences that may enhance higher-order thinking skills. However, empirical evidence examining the impact of a STEAM-SDGs-based VR learning model on students’ critical thinking and creativity remains limited. This study aims to investigate the effect of a STEAM-SDGs-based VR mathematics learning model on students’ critical thinking and creativity. A quantitative research design was employed. The study collected data through structured questionnaires administered to 100 students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. The proposed research model was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS version 3 to evaluate both measurement and structural models. The findings indicate that the STEAM-SDGs-based VR learning model has a significant positive effect on students' critical thinking and creativity. The immersive VR environment, combined with interdisciplinary STEAM integration and SDGs-oriented problem contexts, contributes to improved analytical reasoning, idea generation, and innovative problem-solving skills. This research provides empirical support for integrating STEAM, the SDGs, and Virtual Reality into mathematics education at the higher education level. The study contributes to the development of innovative, technology-enhanced learning models that promote critical thinking and creativity, offering practical implications for educators and policymakers seeking to strengthen 21st-century competencies in university settings.
References
Ansari, M. S. A. (2025). Sustainability through innovation and creativity in the educational landscape: A systematic literature review analysis. Sustainable Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101433
Balalle, H. (2025). Learning beyond realities: Exploring virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in higher education—A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4, 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00559-7
Bertrand, M. G., Sezer, H. B., & Namukasa, I. K. (2024). Exploring AR and VR tools in mathematics education through culturally responsive pedagogies. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00152-x
Boice, K. L., Alemdar, M., Jackson, J. R., Kessler, T. C., Choi, J., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2024). Exploring teachers’ understanding and implementation of STEAM: One size does not fit all. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1401191. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401191
Bulut, N., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2025). Bridging mathematical modelling and education for sustainable development in pre-service primary teacher education. Education Sciences, 15(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020248
Choirunnisa, N. L., Suryanti, S., & Suprapto, N. (2025). Mapping research on STEAM and the Sustainable Development Goals: A bibliometric review of the literature in the last decade. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(11), 2025363. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025363
Chonchaiya, R., & Srithammee, N. (2025). Augmented reality as a tool for enhancing geometry learning and improving mathematical understanding. ECTI Transactions on Computer and Information Technology (ECTI-CIT), 19(2), 350–363.
Coban, M., Bolat, Y. I., & Goksu, I. (2022). The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: A meta-analysis. Educational research Review, 36, 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100452
Fang, Z. (2026). Integrating generative AI in higher art education: A systematic review of tools, pedagogies, and practices. SN Computer Science, 7(2), 215.
García-González, E., López-Pérez, I., & Martínez-Domínguez, M. (2024). The contributions of creativity to the learning process within educational approaches for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 14(8), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080824
Gilligan, K. A., Hodgkiss, A., Thomas, M. S. C., & Farran, E. K. (2022). The role of spatial reasoning in mathematics learning: A review of recent research. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09605-9
Gurmuu, F., Tugea, C., & Hunde, A. B. (2024). Effects of GeoGebra-assisted instructional methods on students’ conceptual understanding of geometry. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2379745. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 34(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2021-0209
He, M., Zhang, F., Ismail, Z., & He, X. (2025). Integrating sustainable development goals through problem-based learning in enhancing motivation in learning mathematics in Ningbo, China. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251385217
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-6
Hidajat, F. A. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual reality application technology for mathematical creativity. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100528
Hlongwana, P., Mudaly, V., & Zulu, M. W. (2025). Enhancing geometry problem-solving through visualization for multilingual learners. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2662. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16564
Ilham, M. R., Prahani, B. K., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2025). Analysis of the role of STEAM education in improving critical thinking skills for sustainable development. Journal of Computational Science and Intelligent Systems, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.1.1.9
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2021). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Khairullina, I., Podmetina, D., & Albats, E. (2022). Art-based innovation teaching and learning: How do students, teachers, and administrators experience STEAM education online?. In Digital Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Developing and Disseminating Skills for Blended Learning (pp. 247-295). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Lavicza, Z., Abar, C. A. P., & Tejera, M. (2023). Spatial geometric thinking and its articulation with the visualization and manipulation of objects in 3D. Educação Matemática Pesquisa Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Educação Matemática, 25(2), 258-277.
Lehrman, A. L. (2025). Embodied learning through immersive virtual reality: Theoretical perspectives for art and design education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 917.
Liao, Y., Chen, Y., & Hsu, C. (2025). Effects of design thinking STEAM instruction on AI learning and creativity—innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-09977-y
Liu, X., Gu, J., & Xu, J. (2024). The impact of the design thinking model on pre-service teachers’ creativity self-efficacy, inventive problem-solving skills, and technology-related motivation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 167-190.
Lyu, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Enhancing college students’ creativity through virtual reality-supported learning environments. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41599-025-05044-y
Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Diezmann, C. (2023). Spatial reasoning in mathematics education: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09743-5
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2133765
Rodríguez, J. L., Romero, I., & Codina, A. (2021). The influence of NeoTrie VR’s immersive virtual reality on the teaching and learning of geometry. Mathematics, 9(19), 2411. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192411
Sánchez-Milara, I., & Cortés-Orduña, M. (2024). Possibilities and challenges of STEAM pedagogies. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.15282
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2022). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 28(5), 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166211052928
Segarra-Morales, A. K., & Juca-Aulestia, M. (2024). Strategies and skills in STEAM education: A systematic literature review. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54235-0_36
Smith, R. (2022). The integration of art: A multiple case study of science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) schools in three schools in Southern California (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Global).
Su, Y.-S., Cheng, H.-W., & Lai, C.-F. (2022). Study of virtual reality-immersive technology-enhanced mathematics and geometry learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 760418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760418
Sudirman, S., Runisah, R., Kusumah, Y. S., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2023). Epistemological obstacles in 3D geometry thinking: Representation, spatial structuring, and measurement. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.04.28
Tyas, A. E. (2025). The impact of the STEAM approach on the level of students’ creativity and critical thinking: A systematic literature review. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.834
Wang, L., Zhang, Q., & Sun, D. (2025). Exploring the impact of an augmented reality-integrated mathematics curriculum on students’ spatial skills in elementary school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 387–414.
Yang, Y., Du, W., Mavrikis, M., & Geraniou, E. (2025). Spatial skill development through augmented reality in mathematics education: A scoping review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00187-8
Zhang, H., Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2024). The impact of virtual technology-based teaching on student creativity: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104858
Zhao, G., Gu, X., Tong, D., Shi, P., Zou, Y., Yuan, H., & Chen, C. (2023). Incorporating STEAM activities into creativity training in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101395
Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Creativity for sustainability: An integrative literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135685
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 STEAM Journal For Elementary School Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 12
,
PDF Downloads: 17
