Students' informal strategy on calculating the volume of three-dimensional shapes in STEM learning project

Design bakpia carton

Authors

  • Irkham Ulil Albab Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Farida Nursyahidah Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Eko Retno Mulyaningrum Universitas PGRI Semarang

Keywords:

Design Research, RME, STEM, Three Dimensional Shapes, Informal mathematics

Abstract

The best mathematics learning is through an activity, as the philosophy of mathematics arises because of human activities. Even so, in practice, mathematics learning is almost always carried out in a mechanistic deductive manner, meaning that students are taught definitions, formulas, practice questions, and then applied questions from formulas. The mathematics given can be in the form of "ready-to-use" as if it is standard knowledge that must be in school. The bad impact is that many students understand mathematical concepts as rigid tools, cannot be used in different situations, and are even easy to forget. This article aims to describe how the learning design of flat-sided shapes in STEM learning projects, Bakpia container design, raises various student strategies in calculating the volume of flat-sided shapes with an understanding that is informal, flexible, and does not only focus on formulas, but also gains an understanding of volume. and a more complete surface area. A research technique, called design research, was used to create the design. The Gravemeijer model's design research was assessed in terms of a hypothetical learning trajectory on the volume 3D object in the preliminary design, Design experiment, and retrospective analysis. The study produced the theoretical design and useful tools based on the approach that promotes student learning and adds to instructional theory on the volume of flat side space. The results of this study indicate that students grow their understanding of calculating the volume and surface area of ​​geometric shapes through informal strategies such as filling in times layers

References

Albab, I. U., Hartono, Y., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2014). Kemajuan belajar siswa pada geometri transformasi menggunakan aktivitas refleksi geometri. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33(3).

Fitriani, N., D. Suryadi, and D. Darhim. (2018). “Analysis of Mathematical Abstraction on Concept of a Three Dimensional Figure with Curved Surfaces of Junior High School Students.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1132(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012037.

Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pembelajaran matematika yang bermakna. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 181-190.

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In Educational design research (pp. 29-63). Routledge.

Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal: a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of curriculum studies, 32(6), 777-796.

Hedayani, Eka. (2018). “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Learning Trajectory Berorientasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kreatif Untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 13(2):158–67. doi: 10.21831/pg.v13i2.21242.

Kamsurya, Rizal. (2019). “Desain Research: Penerapan Pendekatan PMRI Konsep Luas Permukaan Dan Volum Kerucut Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis.” GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 2(1):56. doi: 10.30656/gauss.v2i1.1386.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Mytra, P., & Christi, S. R. N. (2024). Pemahaman Relasional Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Keguruan, 9(02), 16-21.

Nursyahidah, Farida, Bagus Ardi Saputro, Irkham Ulil Albab, and Fifin Aisyah. (2020). “Pengembangan Learning Trajectory Based Instruction Materi Kerucut Menggunakan Konteks Megono Gunungan.” Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 9(1):47–58. doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.560.

Nursyahidah, F., & Albab, I. U. (2021). Learning Design on Surface Area and Volume of Cylinder Using Indonesian Ethno-Mathematics of Traditional Cookie Maker Assisted by GeoGebra. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 79-98.Pramono, D. A. (2021). Pengembangan Modul Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar dengan Pendekatan STEM. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/14826//

Rahmawati, P., Adamura, F., & Apriandi, D. (2022, August). Pengembangan liveworksheet terintegrasi pendekatan STEM pada materi bangun ruang kubus dan balok. In SEMINAR NASIONAL SOSIAL, SAINS, PENDIDIKAN, HUMANIORA (SENASSDRA) (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1111-1117).

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753

Suryaningsih, W., Sukriadi, S., Arafah, A. A., Muhlis, M., Septika, H. D., & Rahmi, R. P. (2024). Pengembangan LKPD dengan Heyzine Berbasis Pendekatan STEM pada Materi Jaring-jaring Kubus dan Balok Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 14(2), 430-438.

van Galen, F., & van Eerde, D. (2013). Solving problems with the percentage bar. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1-8.

Wijaya, R., Zakiah, N. E., & Sunaryo, Y. (2018) Studi literatur: peran etnomatematika terhadap Pendidikan matematika berbasis budaya lokal di nusantara.

Yousuf, A., Mustafa, M. A., Hayder, M. M., Alberto, G., & Cunningham, K. R. (2018, June). STEM education internship program. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Ulil Albab, I., Nursyahidah, F., & Mulyaningrum, E. R. (2025). Students’ informal strategy on calculating the volume of three-dimensional shapes in STEM learning project: Design bakpia carton. Metaverse: Journal of Mathematics Teacher Professional Development Research, 1(1), 12–21. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/metaverse/article/view/42961
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0