Research Trends of Critical Thinking in Mathematics Problem Posing: A Bibliometric Study and Descriptive Content Analysis  

Authors

  • Indri Rohmatul Fakhri Febriani Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Pradnyo Wijayanti Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Manuharawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Endah Budi Rahaju Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v10n1.p103-119

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Problem Posing, Mathematic Education, Bibliometric

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the development of research on critical thinking in problem posing through bibliometric analysis and descriptive content analysis of Scopus-indexed publications from 2015 to 2025. The results indicate that China, Indonesia, and the United States are the most influential countries in this field, with China occupying the leading position in both publications and citations. The most productive affiliation is the National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, and Hwang, G. emerges as the author with the greatest contribution. Publication trends show a sharp increase after 2020, reaching a peak in 2024 with seven published articles. Although critical thinking is strongly connected to problem posing, its relationship with creativity, problem solving, and critical pedagogy remains weak. Content analysis reveals a dominance of quantitative approaches, particularly quasi-experimental designs, with university students as the most frequently studied subjects, purposive sampling as the primary sampling method, and tests as the main measurement instruments. The most commonly used data analysis techniques include descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and n-Gain. These findings highlight clear opportunities for further research, particularly in integrating critical pedagogy, creativity, and learning technologies, as well as in more deeply exploring the cognitive processes underlying critical thinking in problem posing.

 

 

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Aryani, E., Huda, N., & Anwar, K. (2024). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah. Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(4), 1554–1565. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i4.2195

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2

Birgin, O., & Öztürk, F. N. (2021). Research Trends on Mathematical Modelling in Mathematics Education in Turkey (2010-2020): A Thematic Content Analysis. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 12(5), 118-140. http://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.937654

Bonotto, C., & Passarella, S. (2019). Modelling and Problem-Posing In The Teaching Of Mathematics : Teachers’ Perception And Practice. Conference: Eapril Conference 2018. https://www.research.unipd.it/handle/11577/3294697

Boyacı, Ş. D. B., & Atalay, N. (2016). A Scale Development for 21st Century Skills of Primary School Students: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9111a

Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2023). Making mathematics challenging through problem posing in the classroom. In Mathematical challenges for all (pp. 115-145). Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18868-8_7

Cai, J., & Leikin, R. (2020). Affect in mathematical problem posing : conceptualization , advances , and future directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10008-x

Cankoy, O., & Özder, H. (2017). Generalizability Theory Research on Developing a Scoring Rubric to Assess Primary School Students’ Problem Posing Skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(6), 2423–2439. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01233a

Darhim, Prabawanto, S., & Susilo, B. E. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and mathematical problem posing in improving student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1347a

Dinçer, S. (2018). Content Analysis in Scientific Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.363159

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Fajrianthi, F., Hendriani, W., & Septarini, B. G. (2016). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.6304

Frydenberg, M. E., Andone, D. (2011). Learning for 21st Century Skills. IEEE’s International Conference on Information Society, London, 314–318. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34066

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Grundmeier, T. A. (2015). Developing the Problem-Posing Abilities of Prospective Elementary and Middle School Teachers. Research in Mathematics Education, 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_20

Hujjatusnaini, N., Corebima, A. D., Prawiro, S. R., & Gofur, A. (2022). The Effect of Blended Project-Based Learning Integrated With 21st-Century Skills on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.27148

Imayanti, I., Syarifuddin, S., & Mikrayanti, M. (2021). Analisis Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Relasi dan Fungsi pada Siswa SMP. DIKSI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.53299/diksi.v2i1.81

Kocak, O., Coban, M., Aydin, A., & Cakmak, N. (2021). The mediating role of critical thinking and cooperativity in the 21st century skills of higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100967

Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2024). Attending to task variables when engaging in group problem posing for elementary level mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101128

Machmud, W. S., Nurbayani, E., & Ramadhan, S. (2023). Analisis Bibliometrik Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Menggunakan R Packagemetode Penelitian. JUDIKA (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), 11, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.35706/judika.v11i1.8582

Mayr, P., Scharnhorst, A., Larsen, B., Schaer, P., Mutschke, P. (2014). Bibliometric-Enhanced Information Retrieval. In: de Rijke, M., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_99

Moseley, D., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., & Higgins, S. (2005). Thinking Skills Frameworks for Use in Education and Training. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500082219

Nor, H. M., & Sihes, A. J. (2021). Critical Thinking Skills in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 198–201. http://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11529

Ramidha, N. F., Shodikin, A., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software-Based Interactive Media with the RME Approach in Improving Critical Thinking on the Rotation Topic. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(3), 1640-1652. http://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i3.pp1640-1652

Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). Using Manipulatives in Solving and Posing Mathematical Problems. Creative Education, 6(16), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_16

Rosyidi, A. H., Shodikin, A., Purnomo, H., & Wijayanti, P. (2025). Student problem posing based on gender in geometry: Cases in school mathematics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3316(1), 140004. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0290370

Setiana, D. S., & Purwoko, R. Y. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari gaya belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.34290

Setiyowati, Y., & Shodikin, A. (2022). Analysis of Student's Critical Thinking Ability in Solving HOTS (Higher-Order Thinking Skills) Problems with Creative Problem-Solving Model. Inspiramatika, 8(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.52166/inspiramatika.v8i1.2793

Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248099

Silver, E. A. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education : looking back , looking around, and looking ahead. Educ Stud Mat, 83, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3

Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518-525). Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://www2.merga.net.au/documents/RP_Stoyanova_Ellerton_1996.pdf

Susilawati, E., Agustinasari, A., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1453

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

Febriani, I. R. F., Wijayanti, P., Manuharawati, & Rahaju, E. B. (2026). Research Trends of Critical Thinking in Mathematics Problem Posing: A Bibliometric Study and Descriptive Content Analysis  . Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v10n1.p103-119
Abstract views: 13 , PDF Downloads: 11