Additional Menu
Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, DOIs or URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point Times New Roman font; rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- Minimum reference > 25 comes from 80% of scientific journals, the rest may be sourced from proceedings, patents, research books, research reports.
- In case of violation of this statement, I am willing to get any penalties from JRPIPM and be included in the JRPIPM’s list of banned authors.
-
Article Submission and Editorial Workflow
The Journal of Research and Practice in Innovative Mathematics Education (JRPIPM) follows a structured manuscript submission and editorial process to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are properly evaluated in accordance with the journal's publication standards.
The submission process consists of the following stages:
1. Online Registration and Login. Authors register for an account on the journal's online submission system or log in using their existing credentials.
2. New Submission. Authors initiate a new submission, read and agree to the journal's submission requirements, and provide the requested manuscript information.
3. Manuscript Upload. Authors upload the manuscript file and any required supplementary documents, ensuring that the manuscript follows the journal's author guidelines and formatting requirements.
4. Metadata Entry. Authors enter the manuscript title, abstract, keywords, author names, affiliations, and other required metadata.
5. Submission Confirmation. Authors review the uploaded files and submission information before completing the submission process.
6. Initial Editorial Screening. The editor checks the manuscript's relevance to the journal's scope, compliance with submission guidelines, completeness, originality, and suitability for peer review.
7. Peer Review. Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to reviewers for an independent evaluation of their quality, originality, methodological rigor, and contribution to the field.
8. Editorial Decision. Based on the reviewers' comments and the editor's assessment, the manuscript may be accepted, returned for revision, or rejected.
9. Revision and Re-evaluation. If revisions are requested, authors revise the manuscript and submit the revised version. The editor may request further review before making a final decision.
10. Copyediting, Proofreading, and Publication. Accepted manuscripts proceed to the journal's production stages, including copyediting, proofreading, and online publication.
-
Article Submission and Editorial Workflow
The Journal of Research and Practice in Innovative Mathematics Education (JRPIPM) follows a structured manuscript submission and editorial process to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are properly evaluated in accordance with the journal's publication standards.
The submission process consists of the following stages:
1. Online Registration and Login. Authors register for an account on the journal's online submission system or log in using their existing credentials.
2. New Submission. Authors initiate a new submission, read and agree to the journal's submission requirements, and provide the requested manuscript information.
3. Manuscript Upload. Authors upload the manuscript file and any required supplementary documents, ensuring that the manuscript follows the journal's author guidelines and formatting requirements.
4. Metadata Entry. Authors enter the manuscript title, abstract, keywords, author names, affiliations, and other required metadata.
5. Submission Confirmation. Authors review the uploaded files and submission information before completing the submission process.
6. Initial Editorial Screening. The editor checks the manuscript's relevance to the journal's scope, compliance with submission guidelines, completeness, originality, and suitability for peer review.
7. Peer Review. Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to reviewers for an independent evaluation of their quality, originality, methodological rigor, and contribution to the field.
8. Editorial Decision. Based on the reviewers' comments and the editor's assessment, the manuscript may be accepted, returned for revision, or rejected.
9. Revision and Re-evaluation. If revisions are requested, authors revise the manuscript and submit the revised version. The editor may request further review before making a final decision.
10. Copyediting, Proofreading, and Publication. Accepted manuscripts proceed to the journal's production stages, including copyediting, proofreading, and online publication.



