Mathematical Literacy Levels of Students in Solving AKM-Type Numeracy Problems Based on Rational and Artisan Personality Types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v10n1.p1-21Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy Level, AKM Numeracy, Personality TypeAbstract
Mathematical literacy is one of the important skills that students must have in order to deal with problems in daily life. Students' achievement of mathematical literacy can be affected by various factors, especially internal factors such as personality type. This study aims to analyze students' achievement of mathematical literacy in solving AKM numeracy problems based on rational and artisan personality types. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. The research subjects were 9 eighth-grade junior high school students with rational personality type and 8 students with artisan personality type. The instruments used were AKM numeracy test questions, Keirsey personality type questionnaire, interview guidelines, indicator rubrics, recording devices, and researcher notes. The data used were the subjects' written test results in solving AKM numeracy questions, researcher notes, and the results of interviews between the researcher and the subjects. The data analysis techniques used were data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of the study showed that subjects with the rational personality type were able to achieve mathematical literacy levels of one subject at level 4, one subject at level 5, and seven subjects at level 6. Meanwhile, students with artisan personality types achieved mathematical literacy levels of two subjects at level 3, two subjects at level 5, and four subjects at level 6. The main factor behind these differences in achievement is the thinking characteristics of each personality type. Another factor that also contributes to these differences in mathematical literacy levels is the learning experiences of each student.
References
Agustin, M. D. A. (2018). Proses Berfikir Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Madrosatuna: Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 2(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.21070/madrosatuna.v2i2.1967
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Writing Center Talk over Time (Fifth Edit). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3
Darmawan, P., & Yusuf, F. I. (2022). Teori Kognitivisme dan Penerapannya dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Tulungagung: Insan Cendekia Nusantara.
Fitriyaningsih, I., & Ni’mah, K. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Rationals dan Artisans. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 258–266. https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/JIPMat/article/view/15000
Hardiyanti, A. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Kelas IX SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Barisan Dan Deret. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) I Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, (KNPMP I), 78–88. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/knpmp/article/view/2436/2391
Jumrah. (2023). Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Rational Personality Students. Proceeding Konferensi Nasional Matematika (KNM) XXI, 4(1), 46–53. https://scispace.com/pdf/mathematical-problem-solving-ability-of-rational-personality-6pc4t2zd.pdf
Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II : Temperament, Character, Intelligence. In Web Page (First Edit). United States of America: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company. https://dn721902.ca.archive.org/0/items/DavidKeirseyPleaseUnderstandMeII/David-Keirsey-Please-Understand-Me-II.pdf
Kemendikbud. (2021). Framework Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–108. https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/33375/1/FRAMEWORK%20ASESMEN%20KOMPETENSI%20MINIMUM.pdf
Khamidah, K., & Suherman. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di tinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.38
Nada, L. K., Sridana, N., Wulandari, N. P., & Hayati, L. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa. Mandalika Mathematics and Education Journal, 6, 501–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jm.v6i2.7855
Ningsih, R. M., & Awalludin, S. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Extrovert dan Introvert. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2756-2767. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.763
Nismaya. (2018). Analisis Tipe Kepribadian Siswa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 3(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v3i1.1318
Novitasari, Y. F., Purwanto, P., & Permadi, H. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA-Like Problems Based on Personality Types. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112314
Nurfajriah, S., & Sugiman. (2024). Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Ability in Terms of Keirsey’s Personality Types. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 11(8), 659–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i8.6112
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
Prasasti, G. P., Nugraheni, P., & Darmono, P. B. (2023). Analisis Numerasi Siswa SMP pada Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey: Rational dan Guardian. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 1(2), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v1i2.1145
Rahmah, Z., Darmawan, P., & Abdullah, M. N. S. (2024). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Ketercapaian Level Kognitif Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Teorema Pythagoras Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 8(2), 144–172. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.19166/johme.v8i2.8317
Relawati, D. W. M., & Lukito, A. (2020). Metaphorical Thinking of Students with Different Sensing Personality Types in Solving Algebra Problems. MATHEdunesa, 9(2), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p267-275
Septiahani, A., Melisari, & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMK dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Barisan dan Deret. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.613
Sunarto, M. J. D., Budayasa, I. K., & Dwi, J. (2017). Profil Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Tipe Kepribadian Sensing dalam Memecahkan Masalah Logika Matematika. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13119
Wulansari, I., & Walid, W. (2021). Analysis of students mathematics communication ability based on Keirsey personality type through accelerated learning model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 99–106. https:/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.32178
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 1
,
PDF Downloads: 0
