Elementary students’ writing difficulties in Makassar: Patterns, challenges, and learning implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v10n1.p194-211Keywords:
Elementary writing difficulties , Writing performance, Writing instruction , Primary school studentsAbstract
This study investigates elementary students’ writing difficulties in Makassar, Indonesia, using a convergent mixed-methods design. It responds to the need for contextually grounded evidence that not only maps students’ writing performance across analytic dimensions but also explains the classroom conditions shaping those patterns. Quantitative data were collected from 170 upper-elementary students through a classroom-based writing test assessed with an analytic rubric covering content development, organization, vocabulary use, sentence construction, and mechanics. Qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with 15 teachers. The findings revealed that students’ overall writing performance was moderate, with a total mean score of 66.00 (SD = 9.84). Most students were in the moderate category (60.0%), followed by the low category (22.9%) and the high category (17.1%). Dimensionally, students performed better in mechanics/spelling (M = 14.63, SD = 2.87) and vocabulary use (M = 14.11, SD = 2.94), while content development (M = 12.48, SD = 3.21) and sentence construction (M = 11.76, SD = 3.35) remained the most fragile areas. Writing performance also showed gradual improvement across grade levels. Qualitative findings identified four interrelated challenges: limited idea development, weak sentence construction and grammatical control, restricted opportunities for meaningful writing practice, and product-oriented assessment with limited feedback scaffolding. These findings indicate that students’ writing difficulties are shaped by both learner-level limitations and classroom instructional conditions. The study suggests the need for process-based writing pedagogy that strengthens idea elaboration, sentence-level support, sustained writing practice, and revision-oriented feedback.
References
Alfia, F., Lekson, M. A., Manalu, L. A. C., Parinduri, A. F., & Zein, T. T. (2025). Exploring narrative writing skills of Indonesian 6th graders: A critical genre analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v4i2.350
Algorri-Diez, L., Rodríguez, C., & Robledo, P. (2025). Family involvement in primary school children’s writing: A qualitative study with parent focus groups. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121711
Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., McTigue, E., & Uppstad, P. H. (2023). Assessing writing motivation: A systematic review of K–5 students’ self-reports. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09732-6
Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., McTigue, E., & Uppstad, P. H. (2024). The ABCs of writing motivation: A systematic review of factors emerging from K–5 students’ self-reports as influencing their motivation to write. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1396484. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1396484
Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Foldnes, N. (2024). Assessing writing and spelling interest and self-beliefs: Does the type of pictorial support affect first and third graders’ responses? Assessing Writing, 60, 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100833
Andersen, M. R., Kabel, K., Bremholm, J., Bundsgaard, J., & Hansen, L. K. (2023). Automatic proficiency scoring for early-stage writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100168
Arias-Gundín, O., Rodríguez, C., Núñez, J. C., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., & López, P. (2025). Writing quality from different latent profiles of revision subprocesses in upper-primary students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 80, 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102353
Arsyad, S. N., Putri, F. M., & Malik, A. R. (2024). Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes in Social Studies: An Investigation Into The Lazarus Educational Game. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v12i1.67414
Bouwer, R., & van der Veen, C. (2024). Write, talk and rewrite: The effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education. Reading and Writing, 37, 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10474-8
Bouwer, R., van Braak, M., & van der Veen, C. (2024). Dialogic writing in the upper grades of primary school: How to support peer feedback conversations that promote meaningful revisions. Learning and Instruction, 93, 101965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101965
Broc, L., Goudeau, S., & Colliot, T. (2025). Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school. Scientific Reports, 15, 17985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x
Fiskerstrand, P., & Gamlem, S. M. (2023). Instructional feedback to support self-regulated writing in primary school. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1232529. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1232529
Fiskerstrand, P., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024). Mapping oral feedback interactions in young pupils’ writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 31(3–4), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2386515
Goldman, S. R., Carreon, A., Smith, S., & Tuck, K. (2024). Educational technology to support written expression: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231210987
González-Diaz, V., Parr, E., & Nourie, K. (2025). Conceptualisations of ‘good’ writing in the English primary school context. Language and Education, 39(3), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2369268
González-Diaz, V., Parr, E., & Nourie, K. (2025). Using constructs of ‘good’ writing to develop ‘a voice of one’s own’ in the primary school classroom. Literacy, 59(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12397
Graham, S., Skar, G. B., & Falk, D. Y. (2021). Teaching writing in the primary grades in Norway: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 34(2), 529–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10080-y
Guo, Y., Puranik, C., Xie, Y., Dinnesen, M. S., & Breit, A. (2023). An observational study of writing instruction and practice in kindergarten classrooms. Literacy Research and Instruction, 62(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2153765
Guo, Y., Puranik, C., Xie, Y., & Zhao, A. (2025). Typical writing instruction and practice: Contributions to writing skills in kindergarten. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10654-8
Hamsiah, A., Bakri, M., Muhammadiah, M. U., Rizal, A., Darwis, A., & Malik, A. R. (2026). Exploring Academic Writing Competence through Four Emerging Constructs: Digital Self-efficacy, Genre Awareness, Collaborative Writing, and Reflective Revision in Indonesian Contexts. Sage Open, 16(1), 21582440261423575. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261423575
Hebert, M., High, A. E., & Flanigan, J. R. (2025). How elementary school teachers use writing to support reading in the science of reading era: A national survey. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10723-y
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025). Enhancing the peer-feedback process through instructional support: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3
Ibaibarriaga, G., Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2025). The impact of handwriting and typing practice in children’s letter and word learning: Implications for literacy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 253, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106195
Izah, Z. Z., & Cahyaningtyas, A. P. (2025). Analyzing fourth grade students’ narrative writing skills through serial image media. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 10(1), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v10i1.26705
Kim, Y.-S. G., Yang, D., Reyes, M., & Connor, C. (2021). Writing instruction improves students’ writing skills differentially depending on focal instruction and children: A meta-analysis for primary grade students. Educational Research Review, 34, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408
Kokkali, V., & Antoniou, F. (2024). A meta-analysis of almost 40 years of research: Unreleasing the power of written expression in students with learning disabilities. Educational Research Review, 42, 100592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100592
Levlin, M., Nääs, J., & Waldmann, C. (2025). Writing development from Grade 3 to 6 in students with a history of reading difficulties. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111558
Lillich, L., Utesch, T., Graham, S., & Busse, V. (2025). Individual differences in literacy: Effects of gender and language background on primary school writing. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10689-x
Malik, A. R. (2025). ChatGPT as a Cognitive Tool in Sociology: Students’ Perceptions and Its Impact on Academic Writing Practices. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(4), 5240-5248.
Malpique, A., Pino-Pasternak, D., Valcan, D., & Asil, M. (2024). Primary school teachers’ adaptations for struggling writers: Survey study of Grade 1 to 6 teachers in Australia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 57(6), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231211946
Malpique, A., Asil, M., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Valcan, D. (2025). The contributions of student-level and classroom-level factors for Australian Grade 2 students’ writing performance. Written Communication, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251346405
Malpique, A., Valcan, D., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Ledger, S. (2025). Teaching computer-based writing: Primary teachers’ preparation, self-efficacy, and instructional practices. The Australian Educational Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00910-9
Martin, C., & Dockrell, J. E. (2024). Writing productivity development in elementary school: A systematic review. Assessing Writing, 60, 100834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100834
Nuroh, E. Z., & Adiyawati, F. F. (2023). The influence of digital storytelling on story writing skills of class II elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 8(2), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v8i2.18582
Oakley, G. (2026). Digital technologies and the teaching of writing in primary schools. Education Sciences, 16(3), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030499
Rocha, R. S., Magalhães, S., Castro, S. L., & Limpo, T. (2024). Writing performance in primary grade: Exploring the links between cognitive and motivational variables. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1323345. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323345
Skar, G. B., Lei, P.-W., Graham, S., Aasen, A. J., Johansen, M. B., & Kvistad, A. H. (2022). Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 35, 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10185-y
Skar, G. B., Graham, S., Aasen, A. J., Olinghouse, N. G., Aas, H. K., & Fasting, R. B. (2023). Efficacy for writing self-regulation, attitude toward writing, and quality of second grade students’ writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1265785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265785
Skar, G. B., Graham, S., Huebner, A., Kvistad, A. H., Johansen, M. B., & Aasen, A. J. (2024). A longitudinal intervention study of the effects of increasing amount of meaningful writing across grades 1 and 2. Reading and Writing, 37, 1345–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10460-0
Stavans, A., & Zadunaisky Ehrlich, S. (2024). Text structure as an indicator of the writing development of descriptive text quality. Journal of Writing Research, 15(3), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.15.03.02
Sumner, E., Llauradó, A., Cordiner, J., Vettori, G., & Dockrell, J. E. (2026). Oral language and writing skills in the first years of formal education. Scientific Studies of Reading, 30(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2026.2614775
Tavsanli, O. F., Graham, S., Kaldirim, A., & Collins, A. (2023). The effect of sentence combining instruction with second- to fourth-grade children: A replication study in Turkey. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09806-5
Trüb, R., Lohmann, J. F., Möller, J., Jansen, T., & Keller, S. D. (2025). Judgment accuracy in primary school EFL writing assessment: Do text characteristics matter? Assessing Writing, 66, 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100957
Trüb, R., Lohmann, J. F., Möller, J., & Keller, S. D. (2026). Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six. Assessing Writing, 68, 101036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2026.101036
Truxius, L., Sägesser Wyss, J., & Maurer, M. N. (2025). Early handwriting development: A longitudinal perspective on handwriting time, legibility, and spelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1466061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466061
Yamaç, A., Öztürk, E., & Mutlu, N. (2020). Effect of digital writing instruction with tablets on primary school students’ writing performance and writing knowledge. Computers & Education, 157, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103981
Yarmi, G. (2025). Developing a writing instruction model for primary schools based on ISM-DEMATEL to enhance students’ literacy competence: An empirical evidence in Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101963
Zhang, X. Y., Bingham, G. E., Branum-Martin, L., Gerde, H. K., & Bowles, R. P. (2025). Assessing early writing in preschool: Attention to early writing tasks and component skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(4), e70051. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70051
Zhou, X., Wong, H. L., Wei, X., & Siebert, W. S. (2025). Improving the teacher feedback process in primary education: Evidence from randomized controlled trials in schools in rural China. Education Economics, 33(5), 660–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2024.2412680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EduStream: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms :
The articles published in this journal are protected by copyright. The copyright remains with the authors of the articles, but the publishing license is held by Universitas Negeri Surabaya as the journal manager. This license, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA), allows readers to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided that proper attribution is given to the original author and any modified work is published under the same license. This license grants the freedom to use the work both commercially and non-commercially, as long as it adheres to the terms outlined in the license.
Abstract views: 1
,
PDF Downloads: 2














