Elementary school teacher’s perceptions of stem-based performance assessment across urban and rural contexts

Authors

  • Tiani Nabillah Primary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
  • Ghullam Hamdu Primary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Agnestasia Ramadhani Putri Primary School Teacher Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v9n2.p189-201

Keywords:

Teacher Perception, STEM Education, Performance Assessment.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze elementary school teacher’s perceptions of the use of This study investigates elementary teacher’s perceptions of STEM based performance assessment and examines how these perceptions vary between urban and rural school settings. The study adopts a descriptive mixed methods design in which quantitative survey findings serve as the main source of analysis and qualitative input is used to clarify contextual differences across geographical locations. A total of 52 teachers completed a 12 item questionnaire measuring awareness, familiarity, and fluency, followed by short interviews with a purposive sample to explore the reasons behind emerging patterns. The results show that all three aspects fall within the high category, indicating that teachers view STEM based performance assessment as valuable for supporting critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and problem solving. Fluency receives the highest mean score, suggesting that many teachers feel reasonably confident implementing STEM assessment, although the qualitative data reveal gaps in rubric design and project based assessment skills. The comparison across locations shows that rural teachers consistently report higher perceptions than urban teachers. Rural teachers describe more contextual and community oriented experiences, while urban teachers highlight administrative barriers and limited access to technical training. The findings underscore the need for professional development that is sensitive to geographical conditions and supports teachers in designing authentic, integrated STEM performance assessments.

References

Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and Assessment Methods: STEM Teachers’ Perceptions and Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6).

Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100839.

Arlinwibowo, J., Retnawati, H., Pradani, R. G., & Fatima, G. N. (2023). STEM implementation issues in Indonesia: Identifying the problems source and its implications. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2213–2229.

Arnab, S., Masters, A., Purnomo, R. A., Mahon, D., & Minoi, J.-L. (2025). Playful and frugal learning design: A value-based approach to inclusive and sustainable STEM education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101923

Berry, A., Carpendale, J., & Mulhall, P. (2025). Understanding Secondary Inservice Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Implementing Integrated STEM Education. Education Sciences, 15(2), 255.

Chafouleas, S. M., Iovino, E. A., & Stokes, H. E. (2021). Engaging a Whole Child , School , and Community Lens in Positive Education to Advance Equity in Schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(December), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758788

Chang, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chang, S.-C., & Wang, S.-Y. (2021). Promoting students’ cross-disciplinary performance and higher order thinking: A peer assessment-facilitated STEM approach in a mathematics course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3281–3306.

Chaya, H. (2023). Investigating Teachers ’ Perceptions of STEM Education in Private Elementary Schools in Abu Dhabi. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n2p60

Chen, M., Guo, C., Tseng, L., Chiu, M., & Weng, H. (2025). Understanding Teachers’ Interdisciplinary Role Perceptions: Scale Development and Importance–Performance Analysis. Psychology in the Schools.

Cheng, C., & Weatherly, K. I. C. H. (2025). Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Digital Games on 21st Century Skills. Educational Research Review, 100710.

DeCoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018). Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs in STEM education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 485–503.

Drolet, M.-J., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J.-C., Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2023). Ethical issues in research: Perceptions of researchers, research ethics board members and research ethics experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269–292.

Gardner, K., Glassmeyer, D., & Worthy, R. (2019). Impacts of STEM professional development on teachers’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice. Frontiers in Education, 4, 26.

Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72–77.

Guerra-Macías, Y., & Tobón, S. (2025). Development of transversal skills in higher education programs in conjunction with online learning: relationship between learning strategies, project-based pedagogical practices, e-learning platforms, and academic performance. Heliyon, 11(2).

Han, Z., So, W. W. M., & Wan, Z. H. (2024). Challenges in assessing students’ STEM-based problem solving. Ways of Thinking in STEM-Based Problem Solving, 250–262.

Herliani, E., Karyana, S., & Nulhakim, L. (2021). Implementation of STEM Local Context in Indonesia Dr. Elly Herliani 1 , Septian Karyana, M.Si 2 , Lukman Nulhakim, M.Pd 3. SEAQIS Journal of Science Education (SciEd), 1(1), 6–17.

Holmes, K., Mackenzie, E., Berger, N., & Walker, M. (2021). Linking K-12 STEM Pedagogy to Local Contexts : A Scoping Review of Bene fi ts and Limitations. Frontiers in Education, 6(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693808

Hong, S., Eom, T., & Moon, J. (2025). Virtual reality simulation to foster authentic learning in pre-service teacher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 100743.

Jingbo, H., & Ying, L. (2023). Holistic language learning: implementing authentic assessment to cultivate 4c skills in Chinese university English course. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 7, 126–130.

Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: based on a platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 10.

Kusin, S. M. (2022). Teachers’ Teaching Capability in Urban and Rural Areas: A Comparative Study. International Journal Of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business And Education Research, 3(11), 2432–2439. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.11.26

Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2025). Teachers’ psychological ownership as a lens for understanding the adoption of pedagogical innovations: A situated perspective. Learning in Context, 2(1), 100011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lecon.2025.100011

Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford publications.

Lin, P.-Y., Chai, C. S., Di, W., & Wang, X. (2022). Modeling Chinese teachers’ efficacies for the teaching of integrated STEM with interdisciplinary communication and epistemic fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 908421.

Liu, W., & Lian, Z. (2026). Navigating open-ended STEM challenges under uncertainty: A mixed-method experimental study on grit, delay of gratification, and emotion regulation in problem-based learning. Learning and Motivation, 93, 102223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102223

Mayantao, R., & Tantiado, R. C. (2024). Teachers ’ Utilization of Digital Tools and Confidence in Technology. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 07(05), 1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i05-16

Mesny, A., Roberge-Maltais, I., & Galy, A. (2026). Innovative assessment and grading practices in higher education: a critical exploration for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 101307.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

Myyrya, L., Karaharju-Suvantob, T., Virtalac, A.-M. K., Raekalliod, M. R., Salminene, O., Vesalainenf, M., & Nevg, A. (2022). How self-efficacy beliefs are related to assessment practices : A study of experienced university teachers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887812

Osiesi, M. P., & Blignaut, S. (2025). Impact of the teacher education curriculum on the development of 21st-Century skills: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101317.

Papagiannopoulou, T. (2024). Teachers ’ Attitudes Towards STEM Education : Exploring the Role of Their Readiness via a Structural Equation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Helath, Psychology, and Education, 2850–2864.

Peddle, M., Jackson, M., Searby, A., & Alexander, L. (2025). Influence of simulation on the knowledge, skills, and confidence of entry-to-practice nursing students to recognise and respond to occupational violence and aggression: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 106939.

Persada, Y. I. P., Oktarianto, M. L., Wibowo, S., & Ai, K. (2025). The influence of technological skills and geographical conditions on elementary school teachers’ readiness for implementing DL. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 178–185.

Pullu, E. K., & Gömleksiz, M. N. (2021). Authentic teaching tasks for academic success, attitude, problem solving, and creative thinking skills. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(2), 108–123.

Roebianto, A., Savitri, S. I., Aulia, I., Suciyana, A., & Mubarokah, L. (2023). Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology (TPM), 30(1), 5–18.

Saili, J., & Taat, M. S. (2023). Enhancing the Creativity of Islamic Education Teaching through the TPACK Approach : A Conceptual Review. 12(4), 1503–1517. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i4/20311

Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of using STEM in the classroom attitudes, obstacles, and suggestions: A literature review. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23018.

Saubern, R., Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Redmond, P. (2020). TPACK–time to reboot? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1–9.

Sihombing, R. A., Muslim, M., Rahman, T., & Winarno, N. (2024). Enhancing Quality Education in Indonesia: A Literature Review of STEM-ESD Landscape Contributions. Journal of Science Learning, 7(3), 213–226.

Squires, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In Varieties of qualitative research methods: Selected contextual perspectives (pp. 463–468). Springer.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. In Sutopo (Ed.), Sustainability (Switzerland) (5th ed., Vol. 11, Issue 1). ALFABETA. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Thi To Khuyen, N., Van Bien, N., Lin, P.-L., Lin, J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1531.

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Wajnah, W., Kusmawan, U., Arifin, S., Muhammadiyah, M. ud, & Arsyad, M. (2025). Technology-Based Learning Innovation in Community Service: Impact on Improving Education Access in Remote Areas. Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 5(2), 137–144.

Yang, W., Liang, L., Xiang, S., & Yeter, I. H. (2025). Making a Makerspace in early childhood education: Effects on children’s STEM thinking skills and emotional development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101754.

Yar, F. G. M., & Shaheedzooy, M. I. (2023). The role of environmental and geographical factors in the education process. Journal of World Science, 2(12), 2017–2099.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Nabillah, T., Hamdu, G., & Ramadhani Putri, A. (2025). Elementary school teacher’s perceptions of stem-based performance assessment across urban and rural contexts. EduStream: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v9n2.p189-201
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0