PRACTICALITY OF STUDENTS WORKSHEET OF PLANE FIGURE USING CARTOONS DESIGN
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the practicality of Student Worksheets of Plane Figure topics with cartoons design. Practicality is indicated by how be convinience to using the worksheet, a time required in the implementation and students' attractiveness of Student Worksheets on students' learning interests. Students' Worksheets are wished have to influence student learning outcomes and are expected to increase the learning interest of Grade 3 students at SDN 20 Muaro Sijunjung in plane figure topics. The research procedure used the Instructional Development Institute (IDI) model that applied principles of the system approach, discovery (define) or needs analysis, development (develop) and evaluation (evaluate). Practicality is investigated through observation of implementation of teaching and learning process, giving questionnaires of learning interest to students, and interviews students and teachers. Analysis data was carried out descriptively. The results of the learning interest questionnaire can be concluded practically with an average of 78.96%. The results of interviews with students and teachers that LKS with cartoon images are practical from the ease of use, time used, and attractive to students.References
Ahmadi dan Supriyono. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ahmad, Syafwan. (1998). Ilustrasi, Komik, Kartun, dan Karikatur. Padang: Makalah tidak diterbitkan
Anas, Sudijono. (2005). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Arrends, Richard I. (2008). Learning To Teach. Buku satu. Edisi Ke-tujuh. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar
Depdiknas. (2008). Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono.(2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Djamarah dan Aswan. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fauzan, Ahmad. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in Teaching Geometry in Indonesian Primary Schools. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Enschede: University of Twente.
Masdiono, Toni. (2005). 14 Jurus Membuat Komik. Jakarta: Creative Media.
Mc. Cloud, Scoot. (2002). Understanding Comics. Terjemahkan oleh S. Kinanti. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Miswanto. (1998). Studi tentang Minat Murid terhadap Cerita Bergambar di SD Negeri 1 Padang. Padang: FBBS IKIP Padang.
Mudhoffir. (1990). Teknologi instruksional sebagai Landasan Perencanaan dan Penyusunan Program Pengajaran. Bandung Rosda Karya.
Muliyardi. (2002). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Padang: Jurusan Matematika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang.
_____________. (2006). Pengembangan Model pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Komik di kelas I Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi Tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya : Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNESA).
Riduwan. (2005). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rusman, (2010). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesional Guru. Jakarta. Rajawali. Press.
Sabri, A (2007). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Ciputat: Penerbit Quantum TeachingDownloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

