PENGARUH BIAYA OPERASIONAL PENDIDIKAN TERHADAP OUTPUT PENDIDIKAN GURU SMK SE-KABUPATEN GRESIK DENGAN PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI
Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 7, 2017
Keywords:
Operational Cost of Education, Output Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to (1) analyze the influence of education operational costs on educational output at Vocational High School/ SMK in Gresik regency, (2) analyze the effect of education operational costs on educational output with teachers work productivity as a moderating variable at SMK in Gresik regency. This research is an explanatory research with a quantitative approach. The population in this research are vocational high schools (SMK) at Gresik regency. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data collection techniques which used are documentation and interview techniques. While the method of analysis that used is descriptive statistical analysis techniques, statistical analysis techniques infrensial regression with SPSS. The results showed that the education operational cost does not affect the output of education at SMK in Gresik and education operational cost does not affect the educational output with teachers work productivity as moderating variable. Teachers work productivity less can be used as a moderator variable or can not be used as independent variables that have an influence on educational output variables
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Rohmawati, R. (2017). PENGARUH BIAYA OPERASIONAL PENDIDIKAN TERHADAP OUTPUT PENDIDIKAN GURU SMK SE-KABUPATEN GRESIK DENGAN PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI. JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, 5(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.26740/jepk.v5n1.p21-37
Issue
Section
Articles
References
Ahlgrim, W Richard. 2010. A Through and Efficient Education: School Funding, Student Achivement and Productuvity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University. Terre Haute, Indiana
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta
Ekasari, Kurmiati, Yuliana. 2013. Pengaruh Pendidikan dan Kinerja Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: Repository.upy.edu. perpustakaan.upy.edu
Elberts, Randall. at. al. Teacher Performance incentives and Student Outcomes. National Academy of Sciences Conference entitled œDevising Incentives to Promote Human Capital, held December 17-18, 1999, in Irvine, California.
Fattah, Nanang. 1999. Analisis Hubungan Pembiayaan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar dengan Mutu Proses dan Hasil Belajar. Mimbar Pendidikan. FIP IKIP Bandung. No. 3/XVIII/1999.
Fare, R S, Grosskopf. F R, Forsund. K, Hayes. A, Hesmati. 2006. Measurement of Productivity and Quality in non-Marketable Services: With application to schools. Quality Assurance in Education. 14.1 (2006): 21-36
Fitzpatrick, Joyce J. 2006. The Cost and Quality Agenda Comes to Higher Education. Nursing Education Perspectives; Nov/Dec 2006; 27, 6; ProQuest Education Journals. Pg 297.
Flower, Ruth. 1998. Cost and quality of higher education The Education Digest; Oct 1998; 64, 2; ProQuest Education Journals pg. 23
Jackson, Kirabo, C,. 2010. Match Quality, Worker Productivity, and Worker Mobility : Direct Evidance From Teacher. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1050 Massachusetts Avenue. Cambridge, MA 02138
Mallet, Susanne; Wren, Steve; Dawes, Mark; Blinco, Amy; Haines, Brett; et al. 2009. Optimising Teacher Input Maximising Output. Mathematics Teaching. (Nov 2009): 38-40.
Miller, Raegen T; Murnane, Richard J; Willett, John B. 2008. Do worker absences affect productivity? The case of teachers. International Labour Review; 2008; 147, 1; ProQuest Education Journals. pg. 71
Sanjiwani, Estri, Ayu, Ida. 2012. Analisis Biaya Pendiidkan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Proses Pembelajaran dan Aspirasi Pendidikan Siswa (Studi Tentang Persepsi Para Siswa SMA Dwijendra Denpasar Tapel 2011/2012) (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja. http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/ jurnal_ap/article/ viewFile/459/251
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Sutikno, Atmadji, Tri. 2009. Indikator Produktivitas Kerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Vol. 32, NO. 1, Februari 2009 : 107-118.
Supriadi, Dedi. 2004. Satuan Biaya Pendidikan (Dasar dan Menengah). Bandung: Rosda.
Syamsudin. 2009. Pengaruh Biaya Pendidikan Terhadap Mutu hasil Belajar Melalui Mutu Proses Belajar Mengajar Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kabupaten Asahan. (Tesis Magister Pendidikan e-library). Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan. Medan
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: CV Ekajaya.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta
Ekasari, Kurmiati, Yuliana. 2013. Pengaruh Pendidikan dan Kinerja Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: Repository.upy.edu. perpustakaan.upy.edu
Elberts, Randall. at. al. Teacher Performance incentives and Student Outcomes. National Academy of Sciences Conference entitled œDevising Incentives to Promote Human Capital, held December 17-18, 1999, in Irvine, California.
Fattah, Nanang. 1999. Analisis Hubungan Pembiayaan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar dengan Mutu Proses dan Hasil Belajar. Mimbar Pendidikan. FIP IKIP Bandung. No. 3/XVIII/1999.
Fare, R S, Grosskopf. F R, Forsund. K, Hayes. A, Hesmati. 2006. Measurement of Productivity and Quality in non-Marketable Services: With application to schools. Quality Assurance in Education. 14.1 (2006): 21-36
Fitzpatrick, Joyce J. 2006. The Cost and Quality Agenda Comes to Higher Education. Nursing Education Perspectives; Nov/Dec 2006; 27, 6; ProQuest Education Journals. Pg 297.
Flower, Ruth. 1998. Cost and quality of higher education The Education Digest; Oct 1998; 64, 2; ProQuest Education Journals pg. 23
Jackson, Kirabo, C,. 2010. Match Quality, Worker Productivity, and Worker Mobility : Direct Evidance From Teacher. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1050 Massachusetts Avenue. Cambridge, MA 02138
Mallet, Susanne; Wren, Steve; Dawes, Mark; Blinco, Amy; Haines, Brett; et al. 2009. Optimising Teacher Input Maximising Output. Mathematics Teaching. (Nov 2009): 38-40.
Miller, Raegen T; Murnane, Richard J; Willett, John B. 2008. Do worker absences affect productivity? The case of teachers. International Labour Review; 2008; 147, 1; ProQuest Education Journals. pg. 71
Sanjiwani, Estri, Ayu, Ida. 2012. Analisis Biaya Pendiidkan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Proses Pembelajaran dan Aspirasi Pendidikan Siswa (Studi Tentang Persepsi Para Siswa SMA Dwijendra Denpasar Tapel 2011/2012) (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja. http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/ jurnal_ap/article/ viewFile/459/251
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Sutikno, Atmadji, Tri. 2009. Indikator Produktivitas Kerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Vol. 32, NO. 1, Februari 2009 : 107-118.
Supriadi, Dedi. 2004. Satuan Biaya Pendidikan (Dasar dan Menengah). Bandung: Rosda.
Syamsudin. 2009. Pengaruh Biaya Pendidikan Terhadap Mutu hasil Belajar Melalui Mutu Proses Belajar Mengajar Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kabupaten Asahan. (Tesis Magister Pendidikan e-library). Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan. Medan
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: CV Ekajaya.