THE RELATIONSHIP OF METACOGNTIVE KNOWLEDGE WITH METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS IN STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v8n2.p92-96Keywords:
metacognitive awareness, metacognitive knowledge, chemistryAbstract
The 2013 curriculum requires students to demonstrate metacognitive proficiency. The alignment of knowledge and metacognitive awareness can assist students in achieving the learning objectives in the national curriculum. This study aimed to ascertain whether there was a correlation between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive awareness among students. This study employed a correlational design research methodology. The instruments used to gather data including a set of 5 questions involved in testing students’ metacognitive knowledge. Meanwhile, The Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI) which comprised of 52 items was employed to assess metacognitive awareness. The correlation between metacognitive knowledge and awareness can be measured using the Product Moment correlation coefficient. The findings of this study indicated that there was a positive correlation between metacognitive knowledge and awareness yet it was relatively low (0.110).
References
[1] Fauzi, M. A. 2015. The Enhancement of Student’s Mathematical Connection Ability and Self-Regulation Learning with Metacognitive Learning Approach in Junior High School. ICREM7 2015 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics: Empowering Mathematical Sciences through Research and Education, 1-6.
[2] Khamidah, L. 2017. Pemahaman Konseptual dan Pengetahuan Prosedural Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Penyelesaian Soal Matematika pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami), 1(1), 611–616.
[3] Hamdani, H. 2016. Meningkatkan Pengetahuan Konseptual dan Pengetahuan Prosedural Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Diskursus Matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 6(1), 13-25.
[4] Peirce, W. (2003). Metacognition: Study Strategies, Monitoring, and Motivation. (Available at http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/~wpeirce/MCCCTR/metacognition.htm; accessed on February, 15 2018).
[5] Kusumaningrum, G. 2018. Metakognitif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berbasis PISA pada Konten Change and Relationship. Skripsi, Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta, 121.
[6] Lukum, A., Laliyo, L. A. R., & Sukamto, K. 2015. Metakognisi Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(1), 9–18.
[7] Milama, B., Nurjanah, A. I., & Fairusi, D. 2017. Students Metacognitive Level on Solving Chemistry Problems. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 4(1), 63-73.
[8] Rinaldi. 2017. Kesadaran Metakognitif. Jurnal RAP UNP, 8(1), 79-83.
[9] Sumaryati, S. 2006. Metakognitive Awareness: Sebuah Optimalisasi Kualitas Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Seminar Pendidikan Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 307–320.
[10] Sunanto, L., & Asyiah, N. 2018. Pengaruh Strategi Metakognitif terhadap Metakognisi Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 3(1), 91-97.
[11] Budi, S. (2018). Modul Pelatihan SPSS. (March). Lampung: Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1739.4328
[12] Rompayom, P., Tambunchong, C., Wongyounoi, S., & Dechsri, P. 2010. The Development of Metacognitive Inventory to Measure Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge Related to Chemical Bonding Conceptions. Paper presented at International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), 1-7.
[13] Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. 1994. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
[14] Toit, S. D., & Toit, G. D. 2013. Learner metacognition and mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroom. The Journal for Transdisiplinary Research in Southern Africa, 9(3), 505–518.
[15] Herlanti, Y. 2013. Senior High School Students ’ Metacognitive Awareness and Metacognitive Knowledge in Achieving the Graduate Standard. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(1), 357–367.
[16] Arifin, A. N., & Saenab, S. 2014. Perbandingan Kesadaran Metakognitif Siswa yang Diajar Menggunakan Problem-Based Instruction dengan Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share. Bionature.
[17] Maonde, F., Bey, A., Anggo, M., Rahim, U., & Tiya, K. 2015. The Discrepancy of Students’ Mathematic Achievement through Cooperative Learning Model, and the ability in mastering Languages and Science. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 141–158.
[18] Lestari, H. N., Suganda, O., & Widiantie, R. 2017. Hubungan antara Pengetahuan Metakognitif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X. Quangga: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 9(2), 28-37.
[19] Paidi. (2010). Model Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
[20] Syaiful. 2011. Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Di Sekolahmenengah Pertama. Edumatica, 1(2), 1–13.
[21] Heriyansyah, R. T., Nunaki, J. H., & Damopolii, I. 2017. Pengaruh Kesadaran Metakognitif terhadap Indeks Prestasi Mahasiswa Pengaruh Kesadaran Metakognitif terhadap Indeks Prestasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Papua. Simposium Nasional MIPA Universitas Negeri Makassar, 212-215.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 53
,
PDF Downloads: 40
