THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHING MATERIAL BASED ON CONCEPT MAPS TO TRAIN OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS CHEMICAL EDUCATION OF SUDENTS IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF ISOMER

Authors

  • Ismono Ismono Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University
  • Suyatno Suyatno Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University
  • Tukiran Tukiran Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v1n1.p12-21

Keywords:

high-order thinking skills, concept map, inquiry strategy

Abstract

This study is a research and development of teaching materials of concept map-based on inquiry strategy with the aim of testing the feasibility of the device through three indicators, namely: (a) the validity, (b) the effectiveness, and (c) the practicality. The subjects used in this study are three experts namely 2 professors and 1 doctor, and 24 students of chemical education class who take college organic chemistry 1.  Research carried out for four weeks. The results showed that the teaching material to developed: (1) to have the validity of the theory with good category; (2) has practicality in learning; (3) has the effectiveness, because  capable of improving learning achievement and higher level thinking skills shown by the increasing score gain in the category of medium  or high.

Author Biographies

Ismono Ismono, Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

 

Suyatno Suyatno, Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

 

Tukiran Tukiran, Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

Department of Chemistry of Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science of Surabaya State University

 

References

[1] Abrams, R. (2007). Meaningful Learning: A Collaborative Literature Review of Concept Mapping [online] (cited 25/05/2007) Available from http://www2.ucsc.edu/mlrg/clrconceptmapping.html. akses Agustus 2014

[2] Ahuja Amit. (2007). Effectiveness of concept mapping in learning of science, (Unpublished dissertation pu.ac.in/use/amitahuja.htm, akses Mart 2014.

[3] Anderson and Krathwohl. (2001). Blooms Taxonomy Revised, Understanding the New Version of Blooms Taxonomy, A succinct discussion of the revisions of Blooms classic cognitive taxonomy and how to use them effectively. http://www4.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm (2001, 2005), revised 2013.

[4] Aitken, R. & Deaker. L. (2008). Creating the conditions for constructivist learning, 33rd International Conference on Improving University Teaching Transforming Higher Education Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century, July 29- August 1, Glasgow, Scotland.

[5] Ananta Kumar Jena. (2012). Does constructivist approach applicable through concept maps to achieve meaningful learning in Science. Copyright (C) 2012 HKIEd APFSLT. Volume 13, Issue 1, Article 7 (Jun., 2012). All Rights Reserved

[6] Annette deCharon. (2013). http://www.flaguide. org/cat/minute papers/conmap7.php, di akses oktober 2014.

[7] Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

[8] Ausubel. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View, Springer, SBN 978-0-7923-6505-1 .

[9] Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist,: 56, 851864.

[10] Barrow, L. (2006). A brief history of inquiry-From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17 , 265-78.

[11] Borg, W and Gall,M.R. (1989). Educational Research . London: Longman.

[12] Bransford J. D. et al,. (2002). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (HPL), National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2001, expanded edition. Available online at http://www.rose-hulman.edu/ ~richards/sec/ presentations/Share the Future III/Share_III_Handout.pdt, akses 2013.

[13] Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction, New York: Horton.

[14] Bybee, R. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning and the science curriculum. In R.Bybee (Ed.). Learning science and the science of learning, (pp.25-36). Arlington: NSTA.

[15] Bybee R W., Mark V. Bloom, Jerry Phillips, Nicole Knapp. (2005). Doing Science: The Process of Scientific Inquiry, Copyright © 2005 by BSCS. All rights reserved. NIH Publication No. 05-5564. ISBN: 1-929614-

[16] Heinz-Fry, J. & Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-72.

[17] Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science and Education, 1, 115144.

[18] Hyerle, D., Suddreth, S., Suddreth, G. (2008). Thinking Maps. February 26, 2008, from http://www.thinkingmaps.com.

[19] Hyerle, D. (1995). Thinking Maps: Tools for Learning. Cary, NC: Innovative Learning Group.

[20] Ismono. (2014). Kemampuan penyusunan peta konsep guru IPA SMP dan MTs di Jawa Timur, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia, ISBN : 978-602-0951-00-3, 20 September 2014.

[21] Ismono. (2015). Penggunaan Pembelajaran Berbasis Peta Konsep dalam Meningkatkan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA Unesa pada Materi Pokok Isomer, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia, ISBN : 978-602-0951-00-8, 3 Oktober 2015.

[22] Jack, Gladys U. (2013). Concept Mapping and Guided Inquiry as Effective Techniques for Teaching Difficult Concepts in Chemistry: Effect on Students Academic Achievement Journal of Education and Practice, www.iiste.org, ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online Vol.4, No.5, 2013.

[23] Johnson, Andrew P. (2010). Constructivism: Knowing, Learning, Remembering, and Believing Minnesota State University, Mankato www.OPDT-Johnson.com, chapter 15, p 1- 15.

[24] Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching (8 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN-13: 978-0133749304.

[25] Julie Low B and Gary M. Booth. (2013). The Effect of Concept Mapping On Student Achievement in An Introductory Non-Majors Biology Class, European International Journal of Science and Technology , Vol. 2 No. 8 October 2013.

[26] Kardi, Soeparman. (1997). Miskonsepsi Terhadap Konsep-konsep Biologi Kemungkingan Penyebab Miskonsepsi dan Cara Penanggulangannya, Pidato Pengkukuhan Guru Besar (tidak dipublikasikan).

[27] Kazakoff, Annette. (2009). Using concept mapping to scaffold learning for students who experience learning difficulties in science classes. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ 31810/. Akses Feb 2015.

[28] Kinchin, I., Hay, D. & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. J.Educational Research, 42, 43-57.

[29] Krathwohl, David R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, Volume 41, Number 4, Autumn 2002 Copyright (C) 2002 College of Education, The Ohio State University. http://www.unco.edu/cetl/sir/stating_outcome/documents/Krathwohl.pdf. akses 2013.

[30] Leslie Owen Wilson. (2013). Blooms Taxonomy Revised, Understanding the New Version of Blooms Taxonomy, A succinct discussion of the revisions of Blooms classic cognitive taxonomy by Anderson and Krathwohl and how to use them effectively. http://www4.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm (2001, 2005), revised 2013.

[31] Markam, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.

[32] Mintzes J. (2006). Concept Mapping in College Science. Mintzes J and Leonard W, eds. Handbook of College Science Teaching. NSTA Press.

[33] NRC, (2000). Inquiry and National Science Education Standards, A Guide for Teaching and Learning, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.

[34] NRC. (2001), Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. A Guide for Teaching and Learning, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/html/inquiry_addendum/ (2 of 2) [9/10/2001 3:37:45 PM] akses juli 2015.

[35] National Science Teachers Association, (NSTA). (2003), Standards for Science Teacher Preparation, USA.

[36] Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

[37] Novak, J.D. (1990), Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.

[38] Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (liphs) leading to empowerment of learners. J. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571.

[39] Novak,J.D.&Cañas,A.J.(2006) The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them, http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlying ConceptMaps.pdf ..

[40] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 103 Tahun 2014. Tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah, Jakarta.

[41] Piaget J. (1994). Cognitive Development in children: Piaget Development and Learning, J.Res. in Sci. Teaching, 1964, 2:176-186

[42] Roth, W.M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30,pp. 503 534.

[43] Roth, W. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16 437-55.

[44] Rothenberger. Mary C. (2004). Concept Mapping as an Instructional Strategy for Adults www.ahea.org/files/pro2004rothenberger.pdf. akses mei 2014.

[45] Ruseffendi, HET. (2006). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA.: Tarsito, Bandung.

[46] Ruiz-primo, M.A. & Shavelson,R.J. (1996). Problems and issues in use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of research in science teaching, 33, 569-600.

[47] Rye, J. A. & Rubba, P. A. (2002). Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships. School Science & Mathematics, 102(1), 33-45.

[48] Safdar, M. (2010). A comparative study of Ausubelian and Traditional methods of teaching physics at secondary school level in Pakistan. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Islamabad. National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, 66-70.

[49] Safdar Muhammad, Azhar Hussain, Iqbal Shah, Qudsia Rifat. (2012). Concept Maps: An Instructional Tool to Facilitate Meaningful Learning European Journal of Educational Vol. 1, No. 1, 55-64 Vol. 3, No. 3, July 2008, xx-xx ISSN 2165-8714, Copyright © 2012 EUJER. http://www.akademikplus.com/eujer/index.html.

[50] Sket Barbara, Sasa Aleksij Glazar and Janez Vogrinc. (2015). Concepr Maps as Tool for Teaching Organic Chemical Reaction. Acta Chim, Slov, 2015, 62, 462 472 DOI: 10.17344/acsi.2014.1148

[51] Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform in education. In É ducation et didactique, vol 2/2008, 149-157.

[52] Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: what makes groupwork work? In H. Dumont, Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (pp. 161178). Paris: OECD.

[53] Solso Robert L, Otto H. Maclin, M. Kimberly Maclin. (2008). Psiokologi Kognitif, Edisi ke delapan, Erlangga, Jakarta.

[54] Sornnate. Areesophonpichet. (2013). A Development of Analytical Thinking Skills of Graduate Students by using Concept Mapping. the Asian Conference on Education 2013 Official Conference Proceedings Osaka, Japan, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

[55] Stanley D. Ivie. (1998). Ausubel's Learning Theory: An Approach To Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills. (educational psychologist David Paul Ausubel). High School Journal 82.1 (Oct 1998): p35(1).

[56] Steffe, L. P, & Gale, J. 1995. Constructivism in education . Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates // g1.

[57] Sudrajad Ahmad. (2013). Tantangan Guru Dalam Dunia Pendidikan dan Gambaran Pendidikan dalam Abad 21, http://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/ paradigma-pendidikan-indonesia-abad-ke-2. Akses Mei 2014.

[58] Suyanti, Retno Dwi. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia, Penerbit Program Pascasarjana Unimed, Medan

[59] Tony Wagner, (2008). From The Global Achievement Gap: Why Even Our Best Schools Dont Teach The New Survival Skills Our Children Nee ” And What We Can Do About It, New York: Basic Books.

[60] Wheeler, L. A. & Collins, S.K.R. (2003). The influence of concept mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of professional nursing, 19(6), 339-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00134-0. Akses Juni 2014

[61] Wolfolk Anita. (2009). Education Psychology (terjemahan), edisi ke 10, Jakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

[62] Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E & Erkens, G. (2002). 'Collaborative concept mapping: provoking and supporting meaningful discourse', Theory into Practice, Winter

[63] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society (ed. by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-26
Abstract views: 1145 , PDF Downloads: 840