STUDENT’s PERCEPTION OF ONLINE BASED CHEMISTRY LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v6n2.p110-118Keywords:
Chemistry Learning, Online Learning, Perception, StudentsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the learning system in Indonesia to online-based learning. Students' perceptions need to be known to understand how students perceive online chemistry learning, especially during the pandemic. A quantitative method is conducted using a Likert-scale questionnaire of 25 items. The questionnaire is trying to explore students’ perceptions on three dimensions, namely, material and teaching method, learning atmosphere and environment, and social interactions. Respondents are 385 students of the science program at two public schools in Ciamis regency. The results showed that in general, the majority of students (>50%) perceive online chemistry learning positively, especially with regard to material and teaching method and learning atmosphere and environment. However, the dimension of social interaction is found to have more negative responses (>80%) than positive ones. This is apparent in the communication and interaction between students and their teachers and peers. From this study, it is concluded that while online learning seems to be relatively accepted and prepared by students, the social interactions of students need to be seriously considered as they may affect students’ mental health and well-being. Further research is therefore recommended to explore more the extent to which mental health and well-being influence students’ performance in online learning.
References
Meinck, S., Fraillon, J., & Strietholt, R. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education International evidence from the Responses to Educational Disruption Survey (REDS).file:///C:/Users/salag/OneDrive – Office 365/Documents/JCER/sources/2nd/10.1201_9781003261346-20_chapterpdf.pdf
Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H., Krygsman, A., Farrell, A. H., Pepler, D., Landon, S., Saint-Georges, Z., & Vitoroulis, I. 2022. In-Person Versus Online Learning in Relation to Students’ Perceptions of Mattering During COVID-19: A Brief Report. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211053668
Dasna, I. W., & Putri, P. A. W. 2022. Improving the quality of online chemistry learning – A systematic literature review. Improving Assessment and Evaluation Strategies on Online Learning, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003261346-20
Daniel, S. J. 2020. Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1–2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
Surat Edaran Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (COVID- 19), 300 (2020).
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., NgatIjo, & Sulistiyo, U. 2019. Inquiry-based learning in Indonesia: Portraying supports, situational beliefs, and chemistry teachers’ adoptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.6
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Kabupaten Ciamis dalam Angka. In Badan Pusat Statistik. https://ciamiskab.bps.go.id/publikasi.html
Newhouse, D., & Beegle, K. 2006. The effect of school type on academic achievement: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Human Resources, 41(3), 529–557. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.xli.3.529
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. 2019. What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
Fortune, M. F., Shifflett, B., & Sibley, R. E. 2006. A Comparison of Online (High Tech) and Traditional (High Touch) Learning in Business Communication Courses in Silicon Valley. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 210–214. https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.81.4.210-214
Fortune, M. F., Spielman, M., & Pangelinan, D. T. 2011. Students’ Perceptions of Online or Face-to-Face Learning and Social Media in Hospitality, Recreation and Tourism. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1–16.
Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. 2017. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 11(5), S80–S89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
Agastya, W. N., & Triana, D. D. 2022. Assessing the Content Validity and Construct Validity of Non-Cognitive Skills Assessment Instruments for Science Subjects at Junior High School in Indonesia Keywords. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 22(June), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2022.2.0009
Ruliyanti, T., Sumarni, W., & Ulum, M. 2021. The Development of Questionnaire Instruments Assisted by Google Form Application to Measure Students’ Cep Characters on The Stem Integrated Chemistry Module. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 574(Iset 2020), 5–10.
Walanda, D. K., Napitupulu, M., & Poba, D. 2022. Students’ Perceptions Of The Inorganic Chemistry Classroom Management Through A Web-Based Instructional System. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.41404
Van Wart, M., Ni, A., Medina, P., Canelon, J., Kordrostami, M., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. 2020. Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: a hierarchy of factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
Vaillancourt, T., Beauchamp, M., Brown, C., Buffone, P., Comeau, J., Davies, S., Figueiredo, M., Finn, C., Hargreaves, A., McDougall, P., McNamara, L., Szatmari, P., Waddell, C., Westheimer, J., & Whitley, J. 2021. Children and schools during COVID-19 and beyond: Engagement and connection through opportunity. August, 198.
Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H., Krygsman, A., Farrell, A. H., Pepler, D., Landon, S., Saint-Georges, Z., & Vitoroulis, I. 2022. In-Person Versus Online Learning in Relation to Students’ Perceptions of Mattering During COVID-19: A Brief Report. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211053668
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Abstract views: 91
,
PDF Downloads: 225
