Development of Parabolic Motion Learning Devices Based on Technology-Enhanced Guided Inquiry with a Sport Education Approach to Improve High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Widi Astutik Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Wasis Wasis Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Budi Jatmiko Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Noer Risky Ramadhani Mae Fah Luang University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jdpe.v2i1.52270

Keywords:

Guided Inquiry, Learning Tools, Parabolic Motion, Sport Education

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop a parabolic motion learning tool based on a guided inquiry model with a sports education approach to improve the critical thinking skills of high school students. Method: This research is a research and development (R&D) study using the ADDIE model, which includes analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The subjects consisted of 11th-grade high school students involved in both limited and extensive trials. The research instruments included a tool validation sheet, a learning implementation observation sheet, a student response questionnaire, and a critical thinking skills test. Data analysis was conducted using validity, reliability, N-gain, normality, homogeneity, paired t-test, and ANOVA. Results: The results showed that the developed learning tool met the criteria for highly valid with a percentage between 84% and 98%; practical based on the learning implementation category (very good) and student response (87.88%), and effective based on the increase in the N-gain value in the moderate category (0.59–0.62). The statistical test results also showed a significant increase between pretest and posttest scores, and no significant differences between classes, demonstrating the consistent effectiveness of the learning tools. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in the integration of a guided inquiry model with a sports education approach in physics instruction on parabolic motion to train critical thinking skills through contextual learning based on sports activities, a practice that has not been widely explored in previous research.

References

Adair, R. K. (2021). The physics of sports. HarperCollins. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/the-physics-of-sports-robert-k-adair

Adeoye, M. A. (2024). Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624

Adilla, I. N., & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Keefektifan pembelajaran daring fisika SMA berbasis probing prompting untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.426-435

Aldoobie, N. (2020). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 10(2), 1–7. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2020). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Amijaya, L. S., dkk. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis murid. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(2), 94 – 99. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v2i1.17322

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik (edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi ke-2). Bumi Aksara.

Bao, L. (2020). Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American Journal of Physics, 88(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001599

Branch, R. M. (2020). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Budiarti, I. S. (2023). Indra penglihatan; Mata. Bumi Aksara.

Ciesielska, M., Boström, D., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation methods in qualitative research: A review. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2603–2612. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3340

Cohen, L. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press. https://www.insightassessment.com/article/critical-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-counts

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. (2021). Experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 410–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206

Giancoli, D. C. (2021). Physics: Principles with applications (8th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Hayati, N., & Setiawan D. (2022). dampak rendahnya kemampuan berbahasa dan bernalar terhadap kemampuan berfikir kritis murid sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu 6(1), 8517-8528. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3790

Hidayat, R., Festiyed, F., & Asrizal, A. (2022). Desain LKPD berorientasi pembelajaran terpadu tipe jaring laba-laba untuk pembelajaran ipa kelas viii SMPN 1 Painan. Pillar of Physics Education, 8(1), 12-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/2471171074

Johnson, E. B. (2020). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press. https://us.corwin.com

Khoirunnisa, J. P. N., & Dwikoranto, D. (2021). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis murid dalam penyelesaian masalah materi hukum Newton. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 806–816. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.384

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., & Darmaji, D. (2020). Evaluation of students’ critical thinking skills using performance assessment in science learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20481

Mardiyanti, N. E. A., & Jatmiko, B. (2022). Keefektifan pembelajaran fisika dengan model inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan simulasi PhET untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis murid. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 11(3), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5281

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2022). Guidelines for curriculum implementation. Kemendikbudristek.

Nathan, A. M., & Sawyer, R. K. (2022). Learning through physical activity and sport. Routledge.

OECD. (2021). 21st century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Retnawati, H. (2020). Validity and reliability of assessment instruments for measuring students’ higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13224a

Riduwan, & Akdon. (2013). Rumus dan data dalam analisis statistik (Edisi Kedua). Alfabeta.

Rizki, I. A., Widodo, W.. (2021). Eksperimen dan respon mahasiswa terhadap praktikum fisika non-laboratorium menggunakan aplikasi Tracker video analysis untuk percobaan kinematika gerak. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 6(2), 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i2.12640

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

Handayani, N., Aw, S., Zamroni, M. I., Setiawan, J., & Fadli, M. R. (2024). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in social studies learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(2), 923-933. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26448

Sanjaya, W. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan: Jenis, Metode, dan Prosedur. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sari, D. P., Widodo, A., & Wiyanto. (2021). Development of physics teaching materials based on contextual learning to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012123

Sari, R. P., Supahar, & Kuswanto, H. (2020). Development of student worksheets based on scientific inquiry to improve physics learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012061

Sari, Ratna. (2016). Kemampuan berfikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep fisika murid sma pada materi hukum newton. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2020). Physics for scientists and engineers (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., & Darmaji. (2020). Evaluation of students’ critical thinking skills using performance assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20481

Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Bumi Aksara.

Sutopo, S., Wartono, W., & Diantoro, M. (2021). Guided inquiry learning in physics education: Its impact on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30409

Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38. https://hal.science/Hal-03741847/

Usmadi. (2020). Pengujian hipotesis: analisis data statistik parametrik dan non-parametrik. Prenada Media. https://prenadamedia.com

Wicaksono, A. G., & Madlazim. (2020). Penerapan pembelajaran berbasis aktivitas kontekstual untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis murid. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.28461

World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2021). Moving from structured to open inquiry. Science Education International, 32(1), 1–10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ997103.pdf

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Astutik, W., Wasis, W., Jatmiko, B., & Ramadhani, N. R. (2026). Development of Parabolic Motion Learning Devices Based on Technology-Enhanced Guided Inquiry with a Sport Education Approach to Improve High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Digitalization in Physics Education, 2(1), 52270. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdpe.v2i1.52270

Issue

Section

Research & Development in Physics Education Based Digital Technology
Abstract views: 36 , PDF Downloads: 25 , PDF Downloads: 23