Excel Solver Aided Biogas Kinetics Computation for Varied Ratio Co-digestion of Cassava Peels with Chicken Manure

Authors

  • Yusufu Luka Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University
  • Hassan Ahmed Saddiq Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria
  • Abdulhalim Musa ABUBAKAR Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria
  • Nathan Akucha Naandeti Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/vubeta.v2i3.38630

Keywords:

Chicken manure, Biogas kinetics, Cone model, Cassava peels, Co-digestion

Abstract

The co-digestion of cassava peels (CP) and chicken manure (CM) offers a sustainable approach to biogas production, but optimizing process conditions and kinetic modeling remains crucial for efficiency. This study employed Excel Solver to estimate kinetic parameters in the modified Gompertz and Cone models for three different CP:CM ratios (1:1, 1:3, and 3:1) under mesophilic conditions (ambient temperature) and a retention time of 40 days. Anaerobic digestion (AD) was conducted in 4 L batch digesters with a 2 L working volume. Results showed that the 1:3 CP:CM ratio produced the highest cumulative biogas yield (0.25 m³) from experiment, outperforming the other ratios (1:1 = 0.2384 m3 & 3:1 = 0.1576 m3). At the optimal ratio, the modified-Gompertz model exhibited a superior fit (R² = 0.9684) compared to the Cone model (R² = 0.7586), with lower SSE values (2.157 vs. 16.503, respectively), confirming its reliability in capturing microbial adaptation and substrate degradation dynamics. The estimated parameters—biogas production potential (BP = 0.2076 m³), maximum production rate (k = 0.0226 m³/day), and lag phase (λ = 3.4 days)—highlighted the significance of nitrogen balance in optimizing biogas yield. The kinetic study is essential for predicting biogas production trends, optimizing digester performance, and designing efficient biogas systems, while Excel Solver provided is a user-friendly tool for nonlinear regression, eliminating the need for specialized statistical software. This study reinforces the potential of kinetic modeling and computational optimization in enhancing AD processes, paving the way for improved waste-to-energy conversion. 

Author Biographies

Yusufu Luka, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University

mceclip4-ae55cbc44c84bd8bbaf126ca6d9e2ba2.png

Yusufu Luka is a distinguished Nigerian chemical engineer and academic, currently serving as a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Modibbo Adama University (MAU), Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Dr. Luka earned his PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maiduguri, Nigeria, completing his studies between October 17, 2016, and April 27, 2021. His research interests encompass environmental engineering, biotechnology, and process engineering. He has contributed to various studies, including the production of NPK biofertilizers from agricultural waste and the analysis of microbial growth models in chicken manure digesters. Dr. Luka's scholarly work is recognized in academic circles, as evidenced by his profile on the AD Scientific Index. Through his dedication to research and education, Dr. Luka continues to make significant contributions to the field of chemical engineering in Nigeria and beyond

Hassan Ahmed Saddiq, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria

mceclip3-0e67eaaf36be2247be8c43e4805bcb73.png

Hassan Ahmed Saddiq is a Nigerian chemical engineer and academic, currently serving as a Lecturer in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Nigeria. His research interests include chemical reactions, chemical looping technology, catalysis, and energy utilization. According to the AD Scientific Index, his research has been referenced in multiple scholarly works. Through his research and teaching, Dr. Saddiq continues to contribute to advancements in chemical engineering, particularly in areas related to energy y and catalysis.

Abdulhalim Musa ABUBAKAR, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria

mceclip1-60419fccf0a9f4e5b96aeb09d315ead4.png

Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar is a Nigerian chemical engineer and academic, currently serving as a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Modibbo Adama University (MAU), Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. His research interests encompass renewable energy, process engineering, petroleum engineering, and water treatment processes. Engr. Abdulhalim has made significant contributions to these fields, with a particular focus on biogas production, hydrogen recovery, and biodiesel production. Abubakar's scholarly work is well-recognized, with 264 citations to his publications, reflecting the impact of his research within the academic community. He currently holds an h-index of 9 and an i10-index of 8, indicating both the productivity and influence of his work. In addition to his research, Abdulhalim has contributed to the academic community through publications such as "An Elaborate Breakdown of the Essentials of Biogas Production," which provides comprehensive insights into biogas production processes. His dedication to research and education allo him to continue to advance the field of chemical engineering, particularly in areas related to sustainable energy and environmental processes.

Nathan Akucha Naandeti, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria

mceclip2-ea231e6d9bcad3154295ba62d897d94b.png

Nathan Akucha Naandeti, also known as Akuchahyelsu Nathan Naandeti is a Bachelors of Engineering Graduate of Chemical Engineering from Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria. The current work was drafted from his Undergraduate Project Work submitted to the department.

References

REFERENCES

[1] M. S. Jauro, B. Aliyu, A. J. Abubakar, and M. Umar, “Influence of Digestion Temperature on Biogas Production From Discarded Cassava (Manihot Esculenta) Peels,” Nigerian Journal of Tropical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2022. https://doi.org/10.59081/njte.16.1.006.

[2] A. O. Onokwai, U. C. Okonkwo, C. O. Osueke, N. C. Eze, R. S. Diarah, and O. Olawale, “Quantifying cassava waste generation and biogas production in Eha-Alumona Grinding Mills,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2032–2043, 2019.

[3] G. K. Dupont, M. M. Oliveira, N. J. Clerici, C. G. Serafini, D. J. Daroit, and B. M. Wenzel, “Kinetic Modelling And Improvement of Methane Production from the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Swine Manure and Cassava Bagasse,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 176, no. 106900, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106900.

[4] T. Alkhrissat, L. Alqaraleh, G. Kassab, and M. Abdel-Jaber, “Impact of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Chicken Manure and Sewage Sludge Substrates,” Engineered Science, vol. 30, no. 1108, pp. 1–13, 2024. https://doi.org/10.30919/es1108.

[5] A. I. Al-Zoubi, T. M. Alkhamis, and H. A. Alzoubi, “Optimized Biogas Production from Poultry Manure With Respect to Ph, C/N, and Temperature,” Results in Engineering, vol. 22, no. 102040, pp. 1–12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102040.

[6] A. M. Abubakar, Z. Soltanifar, Y. Luka, E. W. Udoh, and M. Hamadou, “Analysis of Microbial Growth Models for Microorganisms in Chicken Manure Digester,” International Journal of Research in Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2021. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.12.1.24.

[7] A. E. B. Etta, E. James, A. Ben, and D. R. Tiku, “Biogas Generation from Co-digestion of Four Substrates; Water Hyacinth, Cassava Peels, Poultry Droppings and Cow Dung,” Annual Research & Review in Biology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2017. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2017/29459.

[8] P. S. Kannan, M. Muthukannan, K. Ganesh, and R. Janani, “Effect of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Waste Chicken Feather with Banana Stem Juice for Production of Biogas,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, vol. 14, pp. 24859–24866, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05824-7.

[9] A. V. Agrawal, P. K. Chaudhari, and P. Ghosh, “Effect of mixing ratio on biomethane potential of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste and food waste,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. vol. 14, pp. 16149–16158, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03737-5.

[10] H. Kayaba et al., “Effect of Organic Nitrogen Supply on The Kinetics and Quality of Anaerobic Digestion of Less Nitrogenous Substrates: Case of Anaerobic Co-Digestion (Acod) of Cassava Effluent and Chicken Droppings as A Nitrogen Source,” Fuels, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6010002.

[11] U. A. Ofon, U. U. Ndubuisi-Nnaji, I. M. Udo, E. S. Udofia, O. K. Fatunla, and S. E. Shaibu, “Biogas Production Potential from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Animal Manure,” J. Chem. Soc. Niger., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2024. https://doi.org/10.46602/jcsn.v49i1.949.

[12] C. H. Achebe, E. Onokpite, and A. O. Onokwai, “Anaerobic Digestion and Co-Digestion of Poultry Droppings (PD) and Cassava Peels (CP): Comparative Study of Optimal Biogas Production,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, pp. 87–93, 2018.

[13] C. C. Opurum, I. N. Nwachukwu, C. E. Nwanyanwu, and C. B. Nwaneri, “Predicting the Rate of Biogas Production from the Anaerobic Digestion of Blends of Cassava (Manihot Esculenta) Peels with Poultry Manure,” Issues Biol. Sci. Pharm. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 38–47, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15739/ibspr.21.005.

[14] P. S. Kannan, M. Muthukannan, K. Ganesh, and R. Janani, “Evaluation of the Effect of Adding Rock Phosphate to Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Chicken Feathers for Biogas Production,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, vol. 15, pp. 3589–3597, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02407-x.

[15] O. Awogbemi, D. V. Von Kallon, and R. C. Ray, “Transformation of Cassava Wastes Into Useful Products,” Transforming Agriculture Residues for Sustainable Development. Waste as a Resource, J. Arora, A. Joshi, and R. C. Ray, Eds., Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61133-9_15.

[16] I. Saif et al., “Magnetic Chicken Bone Biochar Mediated Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Energy Enhancement and Microbial Synergism,” Fuel, vol. 362, no. 130794, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130794.

[17] U. A. Ofon, U. U. Ndubuisi-Nnaji, G. E. Udofia, O. K. Fatunla, and S. E. Shaibu, “Improving Bioenergy Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Paper Waste and Chicken Manure Using Coconut Shell Biochar,” FUDMA J. Sci., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 107–113, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-2869.

[18] S. Rhandouriate, M. Saghir, Y. Naimi, and M. Tahiri, “Assessment of Methane Production Features and Kinetics from Poultry Dropping Waste Under Mesophilic Conditions,” Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 186–195, 2024. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/187102.

[19] S. Basumatary, S. Das, P. Goswami, and P. Kalita, “Investigation of the Effect of Slurry Mixing Ratio and Temperature on Biogas Production From Cattle Dung in A Field-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 45, no. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2023.2267573.

[20] S. Yadav, Chandrahas, R. Thakur, A. Singh, A. Somagond, and S. K. Dubey, “Effect of Substrate Dilution Ratios (Sdrs) on Biogas and Bioslurry Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Pig Faeces Under Field Conditions,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-06278-7.

[21] A. M. Abubakar, K. Silas, M. M. Aji, U. H. Taura, and J. Undiandeye, “Microbial Growth Rate Kinetics in Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure,” iRASD J. Energy Environ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 72–89, 2023. https://doi.org/10.52131/jee.2022.0302.0027.

[22] C. N. Nweke and J. T. Nwabanne, “Anaerobic Digestion of Yam Peel for Biogas Production: A Kinetic Study,” Unizik J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 275--286, 2021.

[23] H. Laiche, H. Erraji, and A. Asehraou, “Optimizing Anaerobic Digestion from Chicken Droppings: Impact of Inoculation With IL And IL-KT01 Inoculums on Specific Biogas Production,” Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, vol. 15, pp. 861–867, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05295-w.

[24] S. Jijai, S. Muleng, L. Noynoo, and C. Siripatana, “Kinetic Model of Anaerobic Digestion from Chicken Manure and Thai Rice Noodle Wastewater in Continuous Reactors,” Glob. NEST J., vol. 25, no. X, pp. 1–7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.005281.

[25] A. M. Abubakar, K. Silas, M. M. Aji, U. H. Taura, and J. Undiandeye, “Biogas Production from Chicken Manure: Characterization And Kinetic Models,” Bayero J. Eng. Technol., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2022. https://doi.org/10.52131/jee.2022.0302.0027.

[26] A. M. Abubakar, L. B. Umdagas, A. Y. Waziri, and E. I. Itamah, “Estimation of Biogas Potential of Liquid Manure from Kinetic Models at Different Temperature,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 46–63, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6835863.

[27] E. Dinneya-Onuoha, K. B. Oyoh, and I. S. Ike, “A model on the Effect of Temperature, Ph and Retention Time on the Co-Digestion of Cassava Peels and Cow-Dung,” SSRN, pp. 1–28, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3935558.

[28] F. A. Aisien and E. T. Aisien, “Biogas from Cassava Peels Waste,” Multidiscip. J. Waste Resour. Residues, vol. 10, pp. 100–108, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13910.

[29] O. T. Ore, O. K. Akeremale, A. O. Adeola, E. Ichipi, and K. O. Olubodun, “Production and Kinetic Studies of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion of Banana and Cassava Wastes,” Chem. Africa, vol. 6, pp. 477–484, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-022-00502-5.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

[1]
Y. Luka, H. A. Saddiq, A. M. ABUBAKAR, and N. A. Naandeti, “Excel Solver Aided Biogas Kinetics Computation for Varied Ratio Co-digestion of Cassava Peels with Chicken Manure”, Vokasi Unesa Bull. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 489–502, Aug. 2025.

Issue

Section

Article
Abstract views: 76 , PDF Downloads: 36