President Xi Jinping's Use of Persuasion Techniques in His BRI Program Speech Text

Penulis

  • Rosita Nugraheni Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Subandi Subandi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Xinyue Lin Central China Normal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v13n1.p1-19

Kata Kunci:

speech, persuasive techniques, Xi Jinping, Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), political discourse

Abstrak

This study ivestigates the use of persuasive techniques in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s speeches delivered to promote the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).  This study aims to identify the forms of persuasion employed and to understand how Xi Jinping constructs his image and influences his audience to accept the BRI concept consciously and without resistance. The study is based on the view that a speech is a persuasive discourse requiring careful selection of language, techniques, and communication strategies to ensure that the message is received in line with the audience’s values and moral beliefs. The analysis of the speech data reveals 119 instances of persuasion, classified into six types of techniques: rationalization, identification, suggestion, conformity, compensation, and projection. Rationalization is used to build logical justification for the BRI concept; identification emphasizes shared viewpoints between the speaker and the audience;  suggestion functions to persuade through the emotional use of imperative diction ; conformity creates a sense of equality and togetherness; compensation highlights transformation toward a better condition; while projection is employed to position China as a positive and open actor, subtly shifting negative impressions toward others. The findings indicate that Xi Jinping strategically employs language and persuasive techniques to deliver political and economic messages within a framework of humanistic, harmonious, and low-conflict communication. These techniques strengthen China’s image as an inclusive global leader that promotes shared benefits through the BRI program.

Referensi

Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.60

Applbaum, R. L., & Anatol, K. W. E. (1974). Strategies for persuasive communication. Merrill Publishing Company.

Blankenship, K. L., & Craig, T. Y. (2011). Language Use and Persuasion: Multiple Roles for Linguistic Styles. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00344.x

Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., & Konijn, E. A. (2021). When Figurative Frames Decrease Political Persuasion: The Case of Right-Wing Anti-Immigration Rhetoric. Discourse Processes, 58(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1851121

Braca, A., & Dondio, P. (2023). Persuasive communication systems: a machine learning approach to predict the effect of linguistic styles and persuasion techniques. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 25(2), 160–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-07-2022-0166

Brent, F. E. D. M. (2008). Latihan Singkat Tangkas Memengaruhi dan Berkomunikasi Efektif. Penerbit Serambi. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jFXJ7dNMgNkC

Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1988). Reported interaction in narrative: A study of speech representation in written discourse [Thesis]. University of Cambridge.

Carfora, V., Di Massimo, F., Rastelli, R., Catellani, P., & Piastra, M. (2020). Dialogue management in conversational agents through psychology of persuasion and machine learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(47–48), 35949–35971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09178-w

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer From “Feeling Right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388

Chatterjee, S. (2009). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology. ACM.

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins e-books. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5dfv0HJ1TEoC

Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Miene, P. K., & Haugen, J. A. (1994). Matching messages to motives in persuasion: a functional approach to promoting volunteerism 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(13), 1129–1146.

Cortazzi, M. (1989). Teachers’ anecdotes: Access to cultural perspectives through narrative analysis [Thesis]. University of Leicester.

Demir, M. Ö., Simonetti, B., Başaran, M. A., & Irmak, S. (2021). Voter Classification Based on Susceptibility to Persuasive Strategies: A Machine Learning Approach. Social Indicators Research, 155(1), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02605-3

Ditto, P. H., & Koleva, S. P. (2011). Moral Empathy Gaps and the American Culture War. Emotion Review, 3(3), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402393

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2015). From Gulf to Bridge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1665–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215607842

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2019). Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12501

Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140

Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized Persuasion. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349

Holtgraves, T., & Lasky, B. (1999). Linguistic power and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(2), 196–205.

Ilardo, J. A. (1981). Speaking Persuasively. Macmillan. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IstXAAAAYAAJ

Kaur, K., Arumugam, N., & Yunus, N. M. (2013). Beauty Product Advertisements: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Asian Social Science, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n3p61

Keraf, G. (1985). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Gramedia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UYKCPwAACAAJ

Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Psychology Press.

Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006

Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the Frame Into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205

Maulana, H., & Gumelar, G. (2013). Psikologi komunikasi dan persuasi. Jakarta: Akademia Permata, 113.

Maureen, I., Imah, E., Savira, S., Anam, S., Mael, M., & Hartanti, L. (2022). Innovation on Education and Social Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003265061

Ottah, G. A. (2020). A Practical Guide on Speech Communication. Journalism Practice, Teaching and Research in Nigeria, 177.

Pangbourne, K., Bennett, S., & Baker, A. (2020). Persuasion profiles to promote pedestrianism: Effective targeting of active travel messages. Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.004

Petty, R. E. (2018). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Routledge.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Elsevier. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 368–392.

Renaldo, Z. A. (2017). ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF BEAUTY PRODUCT ADVERTISEMENTS IN COSMOPOLITAN MAGAZINE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. TELL-US JOURNAL, 3(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2017.v3i2.2628

Rosenfeld, A., & Kraus, S. (2016). Strategical argumentative agent for human persuasion. In ECAI 2016 (pp. 320–328). IOS Press.

Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408–433.

Shaikh, O., Chen, J., Saad-Falcon, J., Chau, P., & Yang, D. (2020). Examining the ordering of rhetorical strategies in persuasive requests. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, 1299–1306.

Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123–137.

Strader, M. K., & Katz, B. M. (1990). Effects of a Persuasive Communication on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Career Choice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924564

Subandi, S., Masrur, M. F., Adimas, Y. B., Arista, C., Dasion, H. Y. T., & Mael, M. R. (2022). Symbolic Domination of the Belt and Road Initiative Program on the Speech Text by Chinese President Xi Jinping. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(12), 846–854.

Subandi, S., & Mustofa, A. (2019). Ideological and Hegemonic Implicatures of Japanese Male Registers Used by Japanese Young Women Speakers: Gender Based Analysis and Its Implication in Pedagogical Domain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity - “Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era” (STEACH 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.21

Subandi, S., Raynox Mael, M., Nurhadi, D., & Prihandari, I. (2024). Representation of Symbolic Domination in Kike Wadatsumi No Koe. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(1), 1327–1334.

Taillard, M.-O. (2000). Persuasive communication: the case of marketing. Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 145–174.

Watt, S. E., Maio, G. R., Haddock, G., & Johnson, B. T. (2008). Attitude functions in persuasion: Matching, involvement, self-affirmation, and hierarchy. Attitudes and Attitude Change, 189–211.

Xinhua, X. (2023, October 18). (BRF2023) Full text of Xi Jinping’s keynote speech at 3rd Belt and Road Forum for Int’l Cooperation. English.News. https://english.news.cn/20231018/7bfc16ac51d443c6a7a00ce25c972104/c.html

Xu, H., & Tan, Y. (2020). Can Beauty Advertisements Empower Women? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the SK-II’s “Change Destiny” Campaign. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1002.05

Yang, D., Chen, J., Yang, Z., Jurafsky, D., & Hovy, E. (2019). Let’s make your request more persuasive: Modeling persuasive strategies via semi-supervised neural nets on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 3620–3630.

Zarouali, B., Dobber, T., De Pauw, G., & de Vreese, C. (2022). Using a Personality-Profiling Algorithm to Investigate Political Microtargeting: Assessing the Persuasion Effects of Personality-Tailored Ads on Social Media. Communication Research, 49(8), 1066–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220961965

Diterbitkan

2026-03-31

Cara Mengutip

Nugraheni, R., Subandi, S., & Lin, X. (2026). President Xi Jinping’s Use of Persuasion Techniques in His BRI Program Speech Text. Paramasastra : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v13n1.p1-19
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0

Artikel Serupa

1 2 > >> 

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.