Teachers’ Tpack in Technology-Enhanced Writing Instruction: Evidence From EFL Classroms Using Grammarly

Authors

  • Yulis Setyowati Universitas Wijaya Putra
  • Aisha Bhatti Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, KSA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v13n1.p203-213

Keywords:

EFL Teacher, Grammarly, TPACK, Writing instruction, Digital Tool

Abstract

The integration of digital technology into English as a Foreign Language instruction has become a crucial requirement in the Indonesian educational context. One technological tool that has recently gained prominence is Grammarly, an automated writing evaluation application that provides real-time feedback. However, the effectiveness of Grammarly in writing instruction largely depends on teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). This study aims to investigate how Indonesian EFL teachers demonstrate their TPACK of Grammarly in the writing course. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis involving Indonesian EFL teachers. The findings demonstrate that teachers’ TPACK is enacted through three interrelated instructional practices in technology-enhanced writing instruction. Teachers shift traditional writing pedagogy toward technology-mediated learning by critically integrating Grammarly as a formative feedback tool rather than a corrective substitute. They further employ multimodal representations to scaffold students’ grammatical understanding within written discourse, while modeling effective writing practices through guided interpretation and selective uptake of Grammarly-generated feedback. The study critically concludes that strong TPACK is essential for preventing overreliance on automated feedback, enabling teachers to appropriate Grammarly as a pedagogically mediated resource that fosters students’ grammatical awareness, metalinguistic reflection, and autonomous writing development.

References

Aisyah, R. N. (2021). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge ( TPACK ) in Action : Unraveling Indonesian English as a Foreign Language Teachers ’ TPACK by Implementing Telegram Research question. 22(3), 17–32.

Aisyah, R. N., Istiqomah, D. M., & Muchlisin, M. (2021). Rising English Students ’ Motivation in Online Learning Platform : Telegram Apps Support. 3(2), 90–96.

Aldebarant, N., Setyowati, Y., Bagaskara, H. S., Priyambudi, S., Negeri, U., & Wijaya, U. (2023). Scrutinizing Discord as an Advanced Platform to Support Students ’ Listening Proficiency ( A Theoretical Perspective ). 2(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.38156/el2j.v1i2

Heriyawati, D. F., & Romadhon, M. G. E. (2025). “Can AI Be Trusted for My Thesis?” The Voices of Indonesian Higher Education Levels About ChatGPT in Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE). Call-Ej, 26(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.252614

Koehler, M. J., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators.

Kutsyuruba, B. (2017). Using Document Analysis Methodology to Explore Educational Reforms and Policy Changes in Post-Soviet Ukraine. In Reimagining Utopias (pp. 199–214). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-011-0_12

Liando, N. V. F., Tatipang, D. P., Rorimpandey, R., Kumayas, T., Saudah, K., & Iskandar, I. (2025). AI-Powered Language Learning: A Blessing or a Curse for English Language Education? Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.34842

Magadan, C. T., & Tulud, D. M. (2025). Grammarly as a Computer-Mediated Tool for Enhancing Writing Instruction. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v6i2.1477

Manurung, S., Setyarini, S., & Rakhmawati, S. S. (2025). Perception vs . Performance : Unpacking Pre-Service EFL Teachers ’ TPACK Gaps in AI-Enhanced Learning Design. 4, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.46843/jpm.v4i3.505

Miranty, D., Widiati, U., Cahyono, B. Y., Intan, T., & Tengku, S. (2025). The effectiveness of Grammarly application and teacher feedback for undergraduate EFL students ’ writing skills. 11(1), 108–133.

Mujayanah, S., Rosaria Indah, D., Fajar Prihantini, A., & Setyowati, Y. (2022). “HOTS” in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Secondary School (Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy study). BIRCI-Journal, 5(3), 23767–23778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6390 23767

Nazari, N., Salman, M., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Heliyon Application of Arti fi cial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education : randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Rejeki, S. (2023). Students’ perceived knowledge of using Grammarly application in academic writing (Issue 21210140000002) [SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY JAKARTA]. repository.uinjkt.ac.id

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education L, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Sahnan, B., Daulay, S. H., & Purnomo, M. D. (2025). Exploring EFL teachers ’ technological pedagogical content knowledge ( TPACK ) in digital classrooms. 10, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.23916/086078011

Samosir, S. A., & Daulay, S. H. (2023). EFL students’ perception of the use “Grammarly application” as Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE). Conference on English Language Teaching, 928–940. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=1GzKScoAAAAJ&pagesize=100&citation_for_view=1GzKScoAAAAJ:tYavs44e6CUC

Selim, A. S. M. (2024). The Transformative Impact of AI-Powered Tools on Academic Writing: Perspectives of EFL University Students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n1p14

Setyowati, Y. et al. (2019a). Skills through Implementation of the Revised A Theoretical Perspective. 380(SoSHEC), 181–184.

Setyowati, Y. (2019b). Let’s Listen Through WhatsApp: An energizing listening exercise in EFL Class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012052

Setyowati, Y., Education, L., Surabaya, U. N., Putra, U. W., Susanto, S., Education, L., Surabaya, U. N., Munir, A., Education, L., Surabaya, U. N., & Nicosia, N. (2022). World Journal on Educational Technology : Current Issues A revised bloom ’ s taxonomy evaluation of formal written language test items. 14(5), 1317–1331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7296

Setyowati, Y., Priyambudi, S., & Wijayanti, G. C. (2024). Students ’ Reflections on Grammarly as a Tool for Academic Writing Support : Perceived Knowledge and Challenges in Higher Education. SCOPE : JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING -, 09(01), 577–587. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24854

Setyowati, Y., Susanto, S., & Munir, A. (2022). Critical Thinking within the Context of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in Written Language Tests. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2), 14706–14715. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/5348

Ulfa, S. M., Nur, R., Setyowati, Y., Inggris, P. B., Inggris, P. B., Inggris, B., Wijaya, U., & Ulfa, S. M. (2022). PELATIHAN PENULISAN ARTIKEL ILMIAH HASIL PENELITIAN BAGI GURU. Reswara Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2, 3(1), 64–70.

Zainuddin, M., Waluyo, B., Kharis, M., & Nahdiyah, U. (2021). Integrating TPACK based HOTS-Textbooks: A case study to attest teaching style in primary school. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), 3662–3670. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.253

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Setyowati, Y., & Bhatti, A. (2026). Teachers’ Tpack in Technology-Enhanced Writing Instruction: Evidence From EFL Classroms Using Grammarly . Paramasastra : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v13n1.p203-213
Abstract views: 2 , PDF Downloads: 0

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.