Levels of Students Mathematics Literacy Using Indonesian Culture Context

Authors

  • Ratri Murdy Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rooselyna Ekawati Mathematics Department, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v5n1.p1-19

Abstract

Mathematics literacy becomes an important component to be able to build 21st century skills. Indonesian culture contexts is used because culture is closely related to the environment and daily lives of students. The aim of this research was to describe the achieving level of mathematics literacy of students using Indonesian culture contexts. This was descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Four students in eighth grade with high mathematical ability and average mathematical ability were chosen to be the subjects from this research. The data was collected by test and interview. The instrument in this research was mathematics literacy test used Indonesian culture context with level 1 to 6 and interview guidelines. The analysis result showed that A1 and A2 (students with average mathematical ability) can achieve at level 3 mathematics literacy indicators. While H1 (student with high mathematical ability) achieve at level 3 mathematics literacy indicators, then H2 (student with high mathematical ability) can achieve at level 4 mathematics literacy indicators. In this research all of the students still cannot achieve at level 5 and level 6 mathematics literacy.

References

N. T. Nilasari and D. Anggreini, “Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient,” J. Elem., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 206, 2019, doi: 10.29408/jel.v5i2.1342.

I. Afriyanti, Wardono, and Kartono, “Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Mengacu PISA Melalui Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 Berbasis Teknologi,” Prism. Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 608–617, 2018.

A. Inayah and L. C. Nisa, “Level Literasi Matematika Siswa SMA Unggulan Berdasarkan Tes Pisa yang Disesuaikan,” 2019, [Online]. Available: https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/xmlui/handle/11617/11039.

Permendikbud No. 64, “Permendikbud-Nomor-64-tahun-2013-ttg-SI,” vol. 2011, 2013.

T. R. Hayati and K. Kamid, “Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Processes in High School Students,” Int. J. Trends Math. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, p. 116, 2019, doi: 10.33122/ijtmer.v2i3.70.

B. Ojose, “Mathematics literacy : are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use?,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2011.

OECD, Literacy, Financial Solving, Collaborative Problem. 2017.

F. Juhaevah, “Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Smp Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Standar Pisa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender,” 2017, doi: 10.33477/mp.v5i2.770.

W. S. Know and C. A. N. Do, What Students Know and Can Do, vol. I. 2019.

E. Volume, “Mulptiple Intelligences ),” vol. 4, pp. 136–150, 2016.

Zulkardi and R. Putri, “Mendesain sendiri soal kontekstual matematika,” Pros. KNM13 Semarang, pp. 1–7, 2010.

K. Basuki, “済無No Title No Title,” ISSN 2502-3632 ISSN 2356-0304 J. Online Int. Nas. Vol. 7 No.1, Januari – Juni 2019 Univ. 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id.

Kadir and L. Masi, “Penggunaan Konteks dan Pengetahuan Awal Matematika dalam Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Using Context and Mathematical Prior Knowledge in Learning Students ’ Creativity Thinking Skills,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–66, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/317543-penggunaan-konteks-dan-pengetahuan-awal-abacf100.pdf.

J. A. Dahlan and R. Permatasari, “Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis etnomatematika dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah pertama,” JNPM (Jurnal Nas. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 133–150, 2018.

Muhammad Daud Siagian, “Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” MES (Journal Math. Educ. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 58–67, 2016.

R. P. Mayasari and I. Kurniasari, “Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Ditinjau Dari Disposisi Matematis,” MATHEdunesa J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2019.

F. A. O. Lastuti, R. M. Maharani, and H. S. Pratini, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Kelas VIII Menurut Gender,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Etnomatnesia, pp. 424–427, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/etnomatnesia/article/view/2357.

U. Layyina, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian pada Model 4K dengan Asesmen Proyek Bagi Siswa Kelas VII,” Prisma, vol. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/%0Ahttps://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20216/9592.

Mahdiansyah and Rahmawati, “LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA PENDIDIKAN MENENGAH : Analisis Menggunakan Desain Tes Internasional dengan Konteks Indonesia 1 MATHEMATICAL LITERACY OF STUDENTS AT SECONDARY EDUCATION LEVEL : An Analysis Using International Test Design with Indonesian Context,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 20, pp. 452–469, 2014.

Nurutami, Aulia, R. I. Y. A. D. I. Riyadi, and Sri Subanti. "The Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Based on Mathematical Ability." Adv. in Intelligent Syst. Res.(AISR) 157. 162–166, 2018, doi: 10.2991/miseic-18.2018.40.

S. I. Edo, Y. Hartono, and R. I. I. Putri, “Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA-model level 5 and 6,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–58, 2013, doi: 10.22342/jme.4.1.561.41-58.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-28
Abstract views: 274 , PDF Downloads: 273