Gender Differences in Mathematical Proficiency: A Review of Mathematics Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p167-181Keywords:
Mathematical Proficiency, Gender, Mathematical PerformanceAbstract
Mathematical proficiency is developed in students to be able to solve problems faced in everyday life appropriately and efficiently. This study focuses on one of the things that influences students' abilities, namely gender. This study aims to describe the process of mathematical proficiency in solving problems based on gender. The instruments of this study were a mathematical ability test, a mathematical proficiency test, and an interview guideline. The mathematical ability test was distributed to 136 students who were members of the natural sciences interest in one of the high schools in Kendari City. Students who meet the specified criteria, namely having mathematical abilities equivalent to different genders, will be selected as research subjects. In this study, differences were found between male and female in solving problems, namely, male subjects can formulate and represent problems, can understand concepts, and apply procedures well so that they can solve problems, while female subjects can understand concepts, can formulate and represent problems, and do not choose procedures correctly so that they cannot solve problems correctly. In addition, they also have similarities, namely that both subjects represent problems with pictures, can explain the relationship between concepts and problems, and get ideas for solving problems based on everyday experiences. The productive disposition ability of male subjects supports in determining the strategies used in solving problems, while female subjects are less supportive in solving problems.
References
Abdo, S., & Elsayed, M. (2022). The effectiveness of learning mathematics according to the STEM approach in developing the mathematical proficiency of second graders of the intermediate school. Education Research International, 2022(1), 5206476. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5206476
Al-Mutawah, M. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Altarawneh, A. F., & Marei, S. T. (2021). Mathematical proficiency and preservice classroom teachers’ instructional performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.354.364
Anwar, I. N., Hidayati, S. A., Fadilah, J. R., & Sukirwan, S. (2023). Studi Investigasi Matematis Siswa: Perbandingan Antara Kepribadian Ekstrovert dan Introvert. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v5i1.6256
Bartlett, K., & Camba, J. D. (2023). Gender Differences in Spatial Ability: a Critical Review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09728-2
Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2019). The Influence of Cognitive Style on Mathematical Communication of Prospective Math Teachers in Solving Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012056
Cerbito, A. F. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Mathematics Proficiency and Attitudes Toward Mathematics of Senior High School Student. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(05), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.05.2020.p10125
Das, U., & Singhal, K. (2023). Solving it correctly: Prevalence and persistence of gender gap in basic mathematics in rural India. International Journal of Educational Development, 96(02), 102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102703
Firdaus, A. M., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2019). Generalization Pattern’s Strategy of Junior High School students based on Gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012045
Hafidz, A. A. (2019). Pengaruh Jenis Kelamin Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2:), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v9i2:.2118
Hamid, H., Angkotasan, N., Jalal, A., Muhtadi, D., & Sukirwan. (2020). Students’ mathematical proficiency in solving calculus problems after Maple implementation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012025
Hanifah, Waluya, S. B., Asikin, M., & Rochmad. (2020). Analisis Self-Efficacy Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Dilihat Dari Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS), 3(1), 262–267. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/612
Juniati, D. (2022). The effect of learning style on problem solving strategies of prospective mathematics teachers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2577(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096017
Khalil, I., & Alnatheer, M. (2020). Developing a Learning Unit in Light of the Integration Between the Mathematical Proficiency and the 21St Century Skills. INTED2020 Proceedings, 1(April), 2501–2506. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.0761
Nugraha, T. H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.5880
Nurcholis, R., Azhar, E., & Miatun, A. (2021). Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Euclid, 8(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v8i1.3205
Oyoo, P. O. (2022). Exploring Students’ Proficiency in Mathematical Symbolization. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.37284/ijar.5.1.774
Rahman, M. & Juniati, D. (2022). Strategic competence in solving-problem and productive disposition of high school students based on cognitive styles. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1(2577(1):020053). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0096029
Rahman, M.S & Juniati, D. (2023). The quality of mathematical proficiency in solving geometry problem: difference cognitive independence and motivation. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.27
Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2022). The circumstances of literacy numeracy skill: Between notion and fact from elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427
Rittle, J. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2021). The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. The Development of Mathematical Skills, January 1998, 75–110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315784755-6
Schulz, A. (2023). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7
Setyawati, D. U., Febrilia, B. R. A., & Nissa, I. C. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i1.15709
Soenarjadi, G. (2020). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin dan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 3(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p78-91
Widyawati, E. P. A. L., Arifin, N., Farhah, A., Nurul, C., & Amalina. (2013). Perspektif Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama Dan Jender, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24014/marwah.v12i1.511
Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). The impact of mathematics teachers’ professional competence on instructional quality and students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101225
Zhang, Z., Chen, J., & Yang, D. (2024). Darg: Dynamic evaluation of large language models via adaptive reasoning graph. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.17271. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.17271
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 63
,
PDF Downloads: 60
